StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. AI
  3. Development & Training Tools
  4. Machine Learning Tools
  5. H2O vs PyTorch

H2O vs PyTorch

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

H2O
H2O
Stacks122
Followers211
Votes8
GitHub Stars7.3K
Forks2.0K
PyTorch
PyTorch
Stacks1.6K
Followers1.5K
Votes43
GitHub Stars94.7K
Forks25.8K

H2O vs PyTorch: What are the differences?

Introduction

H2O and PyTorch are both powerful frameworks commonly used in the field of machine learning and data science. While they share some similarities, there are distinct differences between the two. This article aims to highlight the key differences between H2O and PyTorch in a concise manner.

  1. Ease of Use: H2O provides a user-friendly interface, allowing users to perform various machine learning tasks with ease, including data preprocessing, model training, and deployment. On the other hand, PyTorch is more suitable for experienced programmers, as it offers a highly customizable and flexible framework that requires a deeper understanding of coding.

  2. Framework Focus: H2O focuses primarily on automated machine learning (AutoML) tasks and offers a wide range of built-in algorithms and hyperparameter optimization methods. In contrast, PyTorch is primarily designed for deep learning, providing extensive support for building and training neural networks.

  3. Community and Ecosystem: PyTorch has a larger and more active community compared to H2O, making it easier to find documentation, tutorials, and community support. It also has a vast ecosystem with numerous third-party libraries and tools available for various deep learning tasks. H2O, while having a growing community, may have more limited resources and options in terms of the overall ecosystem.

  4. Language Support: H2O supports multiple programming languages, including Python, R, and Scala, making it suitable for a wider range of users with different language preferences. PyTorch, on the other hand, is primarily focused on Python and has a more extensive set of libraries and frameworks specifically tailored to the Python ecosystem.

  5. Deployment Options: H2O provides convenient options for model deployment, including exporting models to production-ready formats and integrating with various deployment frameworks and tools. PyTorch, being more flexible in nature, requires manual deployment workflows and may require additional development efforts to integrate the trained models into production systems.

  6. Performance and Scalability: H2O is built to handle big data efficiently, providing scalable and distributed computing capabilities. It utilizes parallel processing and distributed computing frameworks, such as Apache Hadoop and Apache Spark, to process large datasets effectively. PyTorch, while being highly efficient for deep learning tasks on a single machine, may require additional frameworks like PySpark or distributed training techniques to handle large-scale datasets efficiently.

In summary, H2O is a user-friendly AutoML-focused framework with excellent scalability for big data, while PyTorch shines in the field of deep learning with its flexibility, extensive customization options, and a larger community.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on H2O, PyTorch

Xi
Xi

Developer at DCSIL

Oct 11, 2020

Decided

For data analysis, we choose a Python-based framework because of Python's simplicity as well as its large community and available supporting tools. We choose PyTorch over TensorFlow for our machine learning library because it has a flatter learning curve and it is easy to debug, in addition to the fact that our team has some existing experience with PyTorch. Numpy is used for data processing because of its user-friendliness, efficiency, and integration with other tools we have chosen. Finally, we decide to include Anaconda in our dev process because of its simple setup process to provide sufficient data science environment for our purposes. The trained model then gets deployed to the back end as a pickle.

99.4k views99.4k
Comments
Adithya
Adithya

Student at PES UNIVERSITY

May 11, 2020

Needs advice

I have just started learning some basic machine learning concepts. So which of the following frameworks is better to use: Keras / TensorFlow/PyTorch. I have prior knowledge in python(and even pandas), java, js and C. It would be nice if something could point out the advantages of one over the other especially in terms of resources, documentation and flexibility. Also, could someone tell me where to find the right resources or tutorials for the above frameworks? Thanks in advance, hope you are doing well!!

107k views107k
Comments
cfvedova
cfvedova

Oct 10, 2020

Decided

A large part of our product is training and using a machine learning model. As such, we chose one of the best coding languages, Python, for machine learning. This coding language has many packages which help build and integrate ML models. For the main portion of the machine learning, we chose PyTorch as it is one of the highest quality ML packages for Python. PyTorch allows for extreme creativity with your models while not being too complex. Also, we chose to include scikit-learn as it contains many useful functions and models which can be quickly deployed. Scikit-learn is perfect for testing models, but it does not have as much flexibility as PyTorch. We also include NumPy and Pandas as these are wonderful Python packages for data manipulation. Also for testing models and depicting data, we have chosen to use Matplotlib and seaborn, a package which creates very good looking plots. Matplotlib is the standard for displaying data in Python and ML. Whereas, seaborn is a package built on top of Matplotlib which creates very visually pleasing plots.

72.8k views72.8k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

H2O
H2O
PyTorch
PyTorch

H2O.ai is the maker behind H2O, the leading open source machine learning platform for smarter applications and data products. H2O operationalizes data science by developing and deploying algorithms and models for R, Python and the Sparkling Water API for Spark.

PyTorch is not a Python binding into a monolothic C++ framework. It is built to be deeply integrated into Python. You can use it naturally like you would use numpy / scipy / scikit-learn etc.

-
Tensor computation (like numpy) with strong GPU acceleration;Deep Neural Networks built on a tape-based autograd system
Statistics
GitHub Stars
7.3K
GitHub Stars
94.7K
GitHub Forks
2.0K
GitHub Forks
25.8K
Stacks
122
Stacks
1.6K
Followers
211
Followers
1.5K
Votes
8
Votes
43
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Very fast and powerful
  • 2
    Auto ML is amazing
  • 2
    Highly customizable
  • 2
    Super easy to use
Cons
  • 1
    Not very popular
Pros
  • 15
    Easy to use
  • 11
    Developer Friendly
  • 10
    Easy to debug
  • 7
    Sometimes faster than TensorFlow
Cons
  • 3
    Lots of code
  • 1
    It eats poop
Integrations
No integrations available
Python
Python

What are some alternatives to H2O, PyTorch?

TensorFlow

TensorFlow

TensorFlow is an open source software library for numerical computation using data flow graphs. Nodes in the graph represent mathematical operations, while the graph edges represent the multidimensional data arrays (tensors) communicated between them. The flexible architecture allows you to deploy computation to one or more CPUs or GPUs in a desktop, server, or mobile device with a single API.

scikit-learn

scikit-learn

scikit-learn is a Python module for machine learning built on top of SciPy and distributed under the 3-Clause BSD license.

Keras

Keras

Deep Learning library for Python. Convnets, recurrent neural networks, and more. Runs on TensorFlow or Theano. https://keras.io/

Kubeflow

Kubeflow

The Kubeflow project is dedicated to making Machine Learning on Kubernetes easy, portable and scalable by providing a straightforward way for spinning up best of breed OSS solutions.

TensorFlow.js

TensorFlow.js

Use flexible and intuitive APIs to build and train models from scratch using the low-level JavaScript linear algebra library or the high-level layers API

Polyaxon

Polyaxon

An enterprise-grade open source platform for building, training, and monitoring large scale deep learning applications.

Streamlit

Streamlit

It is the app framework specifically for Machine Learning and Data Science teams. You can rapidly build the tools you need. Build apps in a dozen lines of Python with a simple API.

MLflow

MLflow

MLflow is an open source platform for managing the end-to-end machine learning lifecycle.

PredictionIO

PredictionIO

PredictionIO is an open source machine learning server for software developers to create predictive features, such as personalization, recommendation and content discovery.

Gluon

Gluon

A new open source deep learning interface which allows developers to more easily and quickly build machine learning models, without compromising performance. Gluon provides a clear, concise API for defining machine learning models using a collection of pre-built, optimized neural network components.

Related Comparisons

Postman
Swagger UI

Postman vs Swagger UI

Mapbox
Google Maps

Google Maps vs Mapbox

Mapbox
Leaflet

Leaflet vs Mapbox vs OpenLayers

Twilio SendGrid
Mailgun

Mailgun vs Mandrill vs SendGrid

Runscope
Postman

Paw vs Postman vs Runscope