StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. HBase vs QuestDB

HBase vs QuestDB

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

HBase
HBase
Stacks511
Followers498
Votes15
GitHub Stars5.5K
Forks3.4K
QuestDB
QuestDB
Stacks19
Followers50
Votes17
GitHub Stars16.3K
Forks1.5K

HBase vs QuestDB: What are the differences?

Introduction
In the world of databases, HBase and QuestDB are two popular choices that offer unique features and functionalities. Understanding the key differences between these two databases is crucial for making an informed decision on which one suits your specific needs best.

  1. Data Model: HBase utilizes a column-family-based data model where columns are grouped together, allowing for efficient read and write operations on related data. On the other hand, QuestDB follows a time-series database model, which is optimized for handling time-series data, making it ideal for applications such as IoT and financial analytics.

  2. Query Language: HBase primarily uses Hadoop's native query language HQL (Hive Query Language) for querying data. In contrast, QuestDB comes with its proprietary, high-performance relational query language called SQL to access and manipulate data easily, making it more accessible to developers and users familiar with SQL syntax.

  3. Performance and Scalability: HBase is known for its horizontal scalability, allowing clusters to expand seamlessly to accommodate growing amounts of data. However, QuestDB stands out in terms of performance, offering blazingly fast query execution speed due to its optimized architecture and data storage format, making it a high-performance database for real-time analytics.

  4. Consistency Model: HBase follows the eventual consistency model, where data consistency is achieved after a short period. In contrast, QuestDB uses a strong consistency model, ensuring that all data reads and writes are consistent and up-to-date across the database, making it suitable for applications that require immediate data consistency.

  5. Indexes: While HBase supports secondary indexes, they can impact performance due to write amplification. On the other hand, QuestDB utilizes the concept of index tables, which are precomputed and stored separately, providing fast access to data without affecting the performance of write operations, leading to improved query performance.

  6. Deployment and Maintenance: Setting up and maintaining HBase clusters can be complex and resource-intensive, requiring expertise in managing distributed systems. In contrast, QuestDB offers a lightweight and easy-to-set-up solution that can run on minimal hardware, reducing the operational overhead and making it a cost-effective choice for small to medium-sized projects.

In Summary, understanding the key differences between HBase and QuestDB in aspects such as data model, query language, performance, consistency, indexes, and deployment can help you choose the right database solution for your specific use case based on factors like data requirements, performance needs, and operational complexity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

HBase
HBase
QuestDB
QuestDB

Apache HBase is an open-source, distributed, versioned, column-oriented store modeled after Google' Bigtable: A Distributed Storage System for Structured Data by Chang et al. Just as Bigtable leverages the distributed data storage provided by the Google File System, HBase provides Bigtable-like capabilities on top of Apache Hadoop.

QuestDB is an open source database for time series, events, and analytical workloads with a primary focus on performance. It enhances ANSI SQL with time series extensions.

-
Relational model for time series; SIMD accelerated queries; Time partitioned; Heavy parallelization; Scalable ingestion; Immediate consistency; Time series and relational joins; Native InfluxDB line protocol; Grafana through Postgres wire support; Schema or schema-free; Aggregations and down sampling
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.5K
GitHub Stars
16.3K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
GitHub Forks
1.5K
Stacks
511
Stacks
19
Followers
498
Followers
50
Votes
15
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 9
    Performance
  • 5
    OLTP
  • 1
    Fast Point Queries
Pros
  • 2
    Open source
  • 2
    SQL
  • 2
    Postgres wire protocol
  • 2
    Real-time analytics
  • 2
    Time-series data analysis
Integrations
No integrations available
InfluxDB
InfluxDB
Java
Java
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL

What are some alternatives to HBase, QuestDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase