High Voltage vs Hugo: What are the differences?
What is High Voltage? Easily include static pages in your Rails app. Write your static pages and put them in the RAILS_ROOT/app/views/pages directory.
What is Hugo? A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator built with love by spf13 in GoLang. Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.
High Voltage and Hugo belong to "Static Site Generators" category of the tech stack.
High Voltage and Hugo are both open source tools. Hugo with 36.4K GitHub stars and 4.09K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than High Voltage with 2.93K GitHub stars and 157 GitHub forks.
What is High Voltage?
What is Hugo?
Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Why do developers choose High Voltage?
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using High Voltage?
What companies use High Voltage?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
What tools integrate with High Voltage?
Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions
Earlier this year, I migrated my personal website (dzello.com) from Jekyll to Hugo. My goal with the migration was to make the development environment as pleasant as possible and to make it really easy to add new types of content. For example, I knew I wanted to add a consulting page and some portfolio-style pages to show off talks I had given and projects I had worked on.
I had heard about how fast Hugo was, so I tried it out with my content after using a simple migration tool. The results were impressive - the startup and rebuild times were in milliseconds, making the process of iterating on content or design less cumbersome. Then I started to see how I could use Hugo to create new page types and was very impressed by the flexibility of the content model. It took me a few days to really understand where content should go with Hugo, but then I felt very confident that I could create many different types of pages - even multiple blogs if I wanted - using a consistent syntax and with full control of the layouts and the URLs.
After about 6 months, I've been very happy with the results of the migration. The dev environment is light and fast and I feel at ease adding new pages and sections to the site.
The Static Content Generator engine, Hugo, is what I use to convert the Markdown content of my site into HTML for serving to the public.
Using Hugo as a backend to generate content for a statically hosted frontend reduces the security risk of hosting a dynamically interactive site.
We use Hugo to build our documentation website based on Markdown content.
We use Hugo to generate all of our secondary sites including documentation, blog and help center.
Hugo is my favorite static site generator. It's the engine behind my personal blog.