Hogo vs Hugo

Overview

Hugo

Stacks1.3K

Followers1.2K

Votes206

Hogo

Stacks3

Followers2

Votes0

Hogo vs Hugo: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between Hogo and Hugo are outlined below:

1. **File Structure**: Hogo follows a hierarchal file structure with separate directories for content, data, static files, and configuration, while Hugo utilizes a flat file structure with all content and resources in one directory. This difference can affect organization and ease of navigation within the project.
  
2. **Template Language**: Hogo uses the Handlebars templating language, which is known for its simplicity and ease of use, whereas Hugo utilizes Go's templating system, which can be more powerful but also requires a deeper understanding of Go programming concepts to fully utilize.

3. **Dependency Management**: Hogo relies on NPM (Node Package Manager) for managing dependencies and building processes, while Hugo has its own standalone binary that includes all necessary dependencies, making it more self-contained and easier to set up and use.

4. **Themes**: Hogo has a limited selection of official themes and relies more on customized designs, whereas Hugo has a larger repository of official themes that can be easily integrated into projects. This difference can impact the speed and ease of theme implementation for developers.

5. **i18n Support**: Hogo lacks robust internationalization (i18n) support out of the box, requiring additional configurations and plugins for multilingual websites, whereas Hugo provides built-in i18n features, making it easier for developers to create and maintain multilingual sites.

6. **Community Support**: Hugo has a larger and more active community compared to Hogo, leading to more frequent updates, better documentation, and a broader range of resources and support for users. This difference can affect the availability of help and resources when working on projects with either platform.

In Summary, Hogo and Hugo differ in their file structure, template language, dependency management, theme availability, i18n support, and community size and support, impacting ease of use and customization for developers.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Hugo, Hogo

Manuel

Frontend Engineer at BI X

Jul 22, 2020

Decided

As a Frontend Developer I wanted something simple to generate static websites with technology I am familiar with. GatsbyJS was in the stack I am familiar with, does not need any other languages / package managers and allows quick content deployment in pure HTML or Markdown (what you prefer for a project). It also does not require you to understand a theming engine if you need a custom design.

178k views178k

Comments

Kazim

Founder & Developer at Devkind

May 13, 2020

Needs advice

Fastest and quickest way to do static HTML site which is extremely fast? Do you consider above tools or is there anything more quicker or better? This is just a one time one pager site for now, no backend required. I might have such projects in future, having something to get familiar with which can immediately come into action to develop would be great advise!

53.6k views53.6k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Hugo	Hogo
Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.	It makes it easy to protect and share your PDF, Word, Excel, and PowerPoint documents with just a few clicks. It protects your documents by uploading and encoding them on its secure cloud server.
Run Anywhere - Hugo is quite possibly the easiest to install software you've ever used, simply download and run. Hugo doesn't depend on administrative privileges, databases, runtimes, interpreters or external libraries. Sites built with Hugo can be deployed on S3, Github Pages, Dropbox or any web host.;Fast & Powerful - Hugo is written for speed and performance. Great care has been taken to ensure that Hugo build time is as short as possible. We're talking milliseconds to build your entire site for most setups.; Flexible - Hugo is designed to work how you do. Organize your content however you want with any URL structure. Declare your own content types. Define your own meta data in YAML, TOML or JSON.	Settable Permissions; Tracking; Supported File Formats are PDF, Microsoft Word (docx), Microsoft Excel (xlsx), PowerPoint (pptx)
Statistics
Stacks 1.3K	Stacks 3
Followers 1.2K	Followers 2
Votes 206	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 47 Lightning fast 29 Single Executable 26 Easy setup 24 Great development community 23 Open source Cons 4 No Plugins/Extensions 2 Template syntax not friendly 1 Quick builds	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Markdown Golang	Windows Microsoft Excel Windows 10

What are some alternatives to Hugo, Hogo?

Jekyll

Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.

Gatsby

Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.

Let's Encrypt

It is a free, automated, and open certificate authority brought to you by the non-profit Internet Security Research Group (ISRG).

Hexo

Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.

Middleman

Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.

Gridsome

Build websites using latest web tech tools that developers love - Vue.js, GraphQL and Webpack. Get hot-reloading and all the power of Node.js. Gridsome makes building websites fun again.

Sqreen

Sqreen is a security platform that helps engineering team protect their web applications, API and micro-services in real-time. The solution installs with a simple application library and doesn't require engineering resources to operate. Security anomalies triggered are reported with technical context to help engineers fix the code. Ops team can assess the impact of attacks and monitor suspicious user accounts involved.

Instant 2FA

Add a powerful, simple and flexible 2FA verification view to your login flow, without making any DB changes and just 3 API calls.

Pelican

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

DocPad

Empower your website frontends with layouts, meta-data, pre-processors (markdown, jade, coffeescript, etc.), partials, skeletons, file watching, querying, and an amazing plugin system. DocPad will streamline your web development process allowing you to craft full-featured websites quicker than ever before.

Related Comparisons

Hogo vs Hugo: What are the differences?

## Introduction

Key differences between Hogo and Hugo are outlined below:

1. **File Structure**: Hogo follows a hierarchal file structure with separate directories for content, data, static files, and configuration, while Hugo utilizes a flat file structure with all content and resources in one directory. This difference can affect organization and ease of navigation within the project.
  
2. **Template Language**: Hogo uses the Handlebars templating language, which is known for its simplicity and ease of use, whereas Hugo utilizes Go's templating system, which can be more powerful but also requires a deeper understanding of Go programming concepts to fully utilize.

3. **Dependency Management**: Hogo relies on NPM (Node Package Manager) for managing dependencies and building processes, while Hugo has its own standalone binary that includes all necessary dependencies, making it more self-contained and easier to set up and use.

4. **Themes**: Hogo has a limited selection of official themes and relies more on customized designs, whereas Hugo has a larger repository of official themes that can be easily integrated into projects. This difference can impact the speed and ease of theme implementation for developers.

5. **i18n Support**: Hogo lacks robust internationalization (i18n) support out of the box, requiring additional configurations and plugins for multilingual websites, whereas Hugo provides built-in i18n features, making it easier for developers to create and maintain multilingual sites.

6. **Community Support**: Hugo has a larger and more active community compared to Hogo, leading to more frequent updates, better documentation, and a broader range of resources and support for users. This difference can affect the availability of help and resources when working on projects with either platform.

Hogo vs Hugo

Overview