Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Hugo
Hugo

581
371
+ 1
113
Metalsmith
Metalsmith

36
36
+ 1
19
Add tool

Hugo vs Metalsmith: What are the differences?

Developers describe Hugo as "A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator built with love by spf13 in GoLang". Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data. On the other hand, Metalsmith is detailed as "An extremely simple, pluggable static site generator". In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.

Hugo and Metalsmith can be categorized as "Static Site Generators" tools.

Some of the features offered by Hugo are:

  • Run Anywhere - Hugo is quite possibly the easiest to install software you've ever used, simply download and run. Hugo doesn't depend on administrative privileges, databases, runtimes, interpreters or external libraries. Sites built with Hugo can be deployed on S3, Github Pages, Dropbox or any web host.
  • Fast & Powerful - Hugo is written for speed and performance. Great care has been taken to ensure that Hugo build time is as short as possible. We're talking milliseconds to build your entire site for most setups.
  • Flexible - Hugo is designed to work how you do. Organize your content however you want with any URL structure. Declare your own content types. Define your own meta data in YAML, TOML or JSON.

On the other hand, Metalsmith provides the following key features:

  • Read template files from a directory
  • Parse files for template placeholders
  • Prompt user to fill in each placeholder

"Lightning fast" is the primary reason why developers consider Hugo over the competitors, whereas "Plugability" was stated as the key factor in picking Metalsmith.

Hugo and Metalsmith are both open source tools. It seems that Hugo with 36.4K GitHub stars and 4.09K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Metalsmith with 7.27K GitHub stars and 640 GitHub forks.

What is Hugo?

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

What is Metalsmith?

In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Hugo?
Why do developers choose Metalsmith?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Hugo?
    What companies use Metalsmith?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Hugo?
    What tools integrate with Metalsmith?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Hugo and Metalsmith?
    Jekyll
    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
    Hexo
    Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.
    WordPress
    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
    Gatsby
    Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.
    VuePress
    A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Hugo and Metalsmith
    Josh Dzielak
    Josh Dzielak
    Developer Advocate at DeveloperMode · | 4 upvotes · 29.7K views
    Jekyll
    Jekyll
    Hugo
    Hugo

    Earlier this year, I migrated my personal website (dzello.com) from Jekyll to Hugo. My goal with the migration was to make the development environment as pleasant as possible and to make it really easy to add new types of content. For example, I knew I wanted to add a consulting page and some portfolio-style pages to show off talks I had given and projects I had worked on.

    I had heard about how fast Hugo was, so I tried it out with my content after using a simple migration tool. The results were impressive - the startup and rebuild times were in milliseconds, making the process of iterating on content or design less cumbersome. Then I started to see how I could use Hugo to create new page types and was very impressed by the flexibility of the content model. It took me a few days to really understand where content should go with Hugo, but then I felt very confident that I could create many different types of pages - even multiple blogs if I wanted - using a consistent syntax and with full control of the layouts and the URLs.

    After about 6 months, I've been very happy with the results of the migration. The dev environment is light and fast and I feel at ease adding new pages and sections to the site.

    See more
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Hugo and Metalsmith
    No reviews found
    How developers use Hugo and Metalsmith
    Avatar of Wing Tang Wong
    Wing Tang Wong uses HugoHugo

    The Static Content Generator engine, Hugo, is what I use to convert the Markdown content of my site into HTML for serving to the public.

    Using Hugo as a backend to generate content for a statically hosted frontend reduces the security risk of hosting a dynamically interactive site.

    Avatar of Secumail
    Secumail uses MetalsmithMetalsmith

    Liked the approach the best of all SSR's out there, integrated it with Gulp for one single build pipeline

    Avatar of Giant Swarm
    Giant Swarm uses HugoHugo

    We use Hugo to build our documentation website based on Markdown content.

    Avatar of Loog
    Loog uses HugoHugo

    We use Hugo to generate all of our secondary sites including documentation, blog and help center.

    Avatar of Yoandy Rodriguez
    Yoandy Rodriguez uses HugoHugo

    Hugo is my favorite static site generator. It's the engine behind my personal blog.

    Avatar of Zetaops
    Zetaops uses HugoHugo

    REST Backend developed for location data access.

    Avatar of DroneDeploy
    DroneDeploy uses MetalsmithMetalsmith

    Static site generation from various sources.

    How much does Hugo cost?
    How much does Metalsmith cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    Pricing unavailable
    News about Metalsmith
    More news