Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Hugo
Hugo

581
371
+ 1
113
Pelican
Pelican

39
40
+ 1
27
Add tool

Hugo vs Pelican: What are the differences?

What is Hugo? A Fast and Flexible Static Site Generator built with love by spf13 in GoLang. Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

What is Pelican? A static site generator, written in Python, that requires no database or server-side logic. Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.

Hugo and Pelican belong to "Static Site Generators" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by Hugo are:

  • Run Anywhere - Hugo is quite possibly the easiest to install software you've ever used, simply download and run. Hugo doesn't depend on administrative privileges, databases, runtimes, interpreters or external libraries. Sites built with Hugo can be deployed on S3, Github Pages, Dropbox or any web host.
  • Fast & Powerful - Hugo is written for speed and performance. Great care has been taken to ensure that Hugo build time is as short as possible. We're talking milliseconds to build your entire site for most setups.
  • Flexible - Hugo is designed to work how you do. Organize your content however you want with any URL structure. Declare your own content types. Define your own meta data in YAML, TOML or JSON.

On the other hand, Pelican provides the following key features:

  • Blog articles and pages
  • Comments, via an external service (Disqus). (Please note that while useful, Disqus is an external service, and thus the comment data will be somewhat outside of your control and potentially subject to data loss.)
  • Theming support (themes are created using Jinja2 templates)

"Lightning fast" is the top reason why over 35 developers like Hugo, while over 6 developers mention "Open source" as the leading cause for choosing Pelican.

Hugo and Pelican are both open source tools. Hugo with 36.4K GitHub stars and 4.09K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Pelican with 8.89K GitHub stars and 1.58K GitHub forks.

What is Hugo?

Hugo is a static site generator written in Go. It is optimized for speed, easy use and configurability. Hugo takes a directory with content and templates and renders them into a full html website. Hugo makes use of markdown files with front matter for meta data.

What is Pelican?

Pelican is a static site generator that supports Markdown and reST syntax. Write your weblog entries directly with your editor of choice (vim!) in reStructuredText or Markdown.
Get Advice Icon

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Why do developers choose Hugo?
Why do developers choose Pelican?

Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions

    Be the first to leave a con
    What companies use Hugo?
    What companies use Pelican?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Hugo?
    What tools integrate with Pelican?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    What are some alternatives to Hugo and Pelican?
    Jekyll
    Think of Jekyll as a file-based CMS, without all the complexity. Jekyll takes your content, renders Markdown and Liquid templates, and spits out a complete, static website ready to be served by Apache, Nginx or another web server. Jekyll is the engine behind GitHub Pages, which you can use to host sites right from your GitHub repositories.
    Hexo
    Hexo is a fast, simple and powerful blog framework. It parses your posts with Markdown or other render engine and generates static files with the beautiful theme. All of these just take seconds.
    WordPress
    The core software is built by hundreds of community volunteers, and when you’re ready for more there are thousands of plugins and themes available to transform your site into almost anything you can imagine. Over 60 million people have chosen WordPress to power the place on the web they call “home” — we’d love you to join the family.
    Gatsby
    Gatsby lets you build blazing fast sites with your data, whatever the source. Liberate your sites from legacy CMSs and fly into the future.
    VuePress
    A minimalistic static site generator with a Vue-powered theming system, and a default theme optimized for writing technical documentation. It was created to support the documentation needs of Vue's own sub projects.
    See all alternatives
    Decisions about Hugo and Pelican
    Josh Dzielak
    Josh Dzielak
    Developer Advocate at DeveloperMode · | 4 upvotes · 30.1K views
    Jekyll
    Jekyll
    Hugo
    Hugo

    Earlier this year, I migrated my personal website (dzello.com) from Jekyll to Hugo. My goal with the migration was to make the development environment as pleasant as possible and to make it really easy to add new types of content. For example, I knew I wanted to add a consulting page and some portfolio-style pages to show off talks I had given and projects I had worked on.

    I had heard about how fast Hugo was, so I tried it out with my content after using a simple migration tool. The results were impressive - the startup and rebuild times were in milliseconds, making the process of iterating on content or design less cumbersome. Then I started to see how I could use Hugo to create new page types and was very impressed by the flexibility of the content model. It took me a few days to really understand where content should go with Hugo, but then I felt very confident that I could create many different types of pages - even multiple blogs if I wanted - using a consistent syntax and with full control of the layouts and the URLs.

    After about 6 months, I've been very happy with the results of the migration. The dev environment is light and fast and I feel at ease adding new pages and sections to the site.

    See more
    Interest over time
    Reviews of Hugo and Pelican
    No reviews found
    How developers use Hugo and Pelican
    Avatar of Wing Tang Wong
    Wing Tang Wong uses HugoHugo

    The Static Content Generator engine, Hugo, is what I use to convert the Markdown content of my site into HTML for serving to the public.

    Using Hugo as a backend to generate content for a statically hosted frontend reduces the security risk of hosting a dynamically interactive site.

    Avatar of Giant Swarm
    Giant Swarm uses HugoHugo

    We use Hugo to build our documentation website based on Markdown content.

    Avatar of Loog
    Loog uses HugoHugo

    We use Hugo to generate all of our secondary sites including documentation, blog and help center.

    Avatar of Yoandy Rodriguez
    Yoandy Rodriguez uses HugoHugo

    Hugo is my favorite static site generator. It's the engine behind my personal blog.

    Avatar of Zetaops
    Zetaops uses HugoHugo

    REST Backend developed for location data access.

    How much does Hugo cost?
    How much does Pelican cost?
    Pricing unavailable
    Pricing unavailable
    News about Pelican
    More news