StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Ionic vs MEAN

Ionic vs MEAN

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Ionic
Ionic
Stacks9.5K
Followers8.6K
Votes1.8K
MEAN
MEAN
Stacks337
Followers617
Votes594
GitHub Stars12.1K
Forks3.4K

Ionic vs MEAN: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Ionic and MEAN. Both Ionic and MEAN are popular frameworks used for web and mobile app development. Here, we will discuss the key differences between these two frameworks in detail.

  1. Development Language and Framework: Ionic is a framework that allows developers to build hybrid mobile applications using web technologies such as HTML, CSS, and JavaScript. On the other hand, MEAN is a full-stack JavaScript framework used for developing web applications. It stands for MongoDB, Express.js, Angular, and Node.js, where each component represents a different layer of the application stack.

  2. Architecture and Purpose: Ionic primarily focuses on providing a user interface (UI) framework for building mobile apps. It utilizes a combination of HTML, CSS, and JavaScript to provide a native-like experience across multiple platforms. MEAN, however, is a full-stack framework that provides a complete solution for developing web applications, including the backend, frontend, and database components.

  3. Platform Support: Ionic is designed to build mobile applications that can run on various platforms such as iOS, Android, and Windows. It achieves this by using a single codebase and leveraging native device features through plugins. MEAN, on the other hand, is primarily used for building web applications and does not have the same level of native mobile support as Ionic.

  4. Database Integration: Ionic supports various databases and can integrate with different server-side technologies to handle database operations. In contrast, MEAN has a specific database stack, which includes MongoDB as the database management system. The MEAN stack utilizes MongoDB's document-oriented approach, while Ionic offers more flexibility in terms of the database used.

  5. Backend Integration: MEAN includes Node.js as its backend technology, allowing developers to write server-side code using JavaScript. This provides a seamless integration between the frontend and backend, as they both use the same language. Ionic, on the other hand, allows developers to integrate with any backend technology, providing more freedom in choosing the server-side stack.

  6. Learning Curve and Community Support: Ionic is built on top of Angular, one of the most popular frontend frameworks. This means that developers with experience in Angular can easily adapt to Ionic. MEAN, on the other hand, requires proficiency in multiple technologies (MongoDB, Express.js, Angular, and Node.js), which may have a steeper learning curve. However, both frameworks have active communities and extensive documentation available for support.

In summary, Ionic is a UI framework for building hybrid mobile applications using web technologies, while MEAN is a full-stack JavaScript framework specifically designed for web development. Ionic focuses on mobile app development, supports various platforms, and can integrate with different databases and backend technologies. MEAN, on the other hand, covers all aspects of web development and includes the specific MEAN stack components.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Ionic, MEAN

Anonymous
Anonymous

CEO at ME!

Jun 7, 2020

Decided

While with Ionic it is possible to make mobile applications with only web technologies, Flutter is more performant and is easy to use if you are willing to learn Dart, which is a fun language. Plus, it has awesome documentation and, while its ecosystem isn't near as big as JavaScript's is, it has a good package manager called Pub and its packages are generally high quality.

403k views403k
Comments
Thuan
Thuan

FE Lead at SOLID ENGINEER

Jun 16, 2020

Decided
  • Javascripts is the most populated language in the world.
  • Easy to learn & deployed production
  • Fast development
  • Strong community
  • Completed Documents
  • Native performance with lower RAM used.
  • Easy to handle native issues by using native code like Java / Objective C
  • Powered by Facebook.
666k views666k
Comments
Melly
Melly

Dec 19, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, we are an early startup (with an iPOC prototype) but need to get started on our MVP, and our tech developers in India recommended a hybrid, and they use Ionic, then we spoke with a software company in the US and he recommended Flutter or React Native. Any advice or input for us on the differences between these? Our app will need Bluetooth GPS for "near me" and social media sharing reviews capability, and also link on the backend with businesses. Thanks in advance for any help you can give!

540k views540k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Ionic
Ionic
MEAN
MEAN

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

MEAN (Mongo, Express, Angular, Node) is a boilerplate that provides a nice starting point for MongoDB, Node.js, Express, and AngularJS based applications. It is designed to give you a quick and organized way to start developing MEAN based web apps with useful modules like Mongoose and Passport pre-bundled and configured.

Performance obsessed;Utilizes Angular and React;Native focused;Beautifully designed;Based on Web Components;
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
12.1K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
9.5K
Stacks
337
Followers
8.6K
Followers
617
Votes
1.8K
Votes
594
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 248
    Allows for rapid prototyping
  • 228
    Hybrid mobile
  • 208
    It's angularjs
  • 186
    Free
  • 179
    It's javascript, html, and css
Cons
  • 20
    Not suitable for high performance or UI intensive apps
  • 15
    Not meant for game development
  • 2
    Not a native app
Pros
  • 86
    Javascript
  • 62
    Easy
  • 58
    Nosql
  • 52
    Great community
  • 50
    Modularity
Integrations
No integrations available
MongoDB
MongoDB
Node.js
Node.js
ExpressJS
ExpressJS
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Ionic, MEAN?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase