Iris vs Martini vs Rapidoid: What are the differences?

1. Architecture: Iris follows the MVC (Model-View-Controller) architectural pattern, making it suitable for larger, more complex applications, while Martini and Rapidoid have a more lightweight, minimalistic architecture, focusing on simplicity and smaller projects.

2. Performance: Iris boasts impressive performance benchmarks due to its use of the Fasthttp as a server, while Martini and Rapidoid may have slightly lower performance metrics compared to Iris.

3. Middleware Support: Iris offers a wide range of built-in middleware features, making it easier to integrate functionalities like CORS, GZIP compression, and authentication, whereas Martini and Rapidoid may require additional third-party libraries for similar middleware support.

4. Community & Support: Iris has a strong and active community with regular updates and support, making it easy to find documentation and assistance, while Martini and Rapidoid may have a smaller community and less frequent updates.

5. Learning Curve: Iris has a steeper learning curve compared to Martini and Rapidoid, as it offers more advanced features and functionality that may require more time to understand and implement effectively.

6. Extensibility & Flexibility: Iris provides more flexibility and extensibility options, allowing developers to customize and extend the framework according to their specific needs, whereas Martini and Rapidoid may have limitations in terms of customization and extension capabilities.

In Summary, Iris differs from Martini and Rapidoid in terms of architecture, performance, middleware support, community & support, learning curve, and extensibility & flexibility, making it a suitable choice for larger, complex applications with specific customization needs.