JavaFX vs ReactNativeEverywhere

Overview

JavaFX

Stacks280

Followers418

Votes11

ReactNativeEverywhere

Stacks2

Followers22

Votes0

JavaFX vs ReactNativeEverywhere: What are the differences?

**Introduction:**
JavaFX and React Native are two popular technologies used for building user interfaces. While JavaFX is a framework for building desktop and mobile applications using Java, React Native is a framework for building cross-platform mobile applications using JavaScript.

**1. Architecture:** JavaFX follows a single-threaded architecture, where all UI updates are done on the JavaFX Application thread. On the other hand, React Native employs a multi-threaded architecture, utilizing separate threads for UI rendering and JavaScript execution, which can enhance performance and responsiveness.

**2. Language:** JavaFX requires knowledge of Java programming language for development, making it suitable for Java developers. React Native, on the other hand, uses JavaScript for development, which is a simpler language and allows for easier adoption by web developers.

**3. Platform Support:** JavaFX is primarily aimed at desktop applications but can also be used for mobile development. React Native, however, is specifically designed for cross-platform mobile development, supporting both Android and iOS platforms.

**4. User Interface Components:** JavaFX provides a comprehensive set of built-in UI components, making it easier to design user interfaces. React Native, on the other hand, relies on third-party libraries and components for UI design, offering more flexibility but requiring additional effort for implementation.

**5. Tooling and Debugging:** JavaFX has robust tooling support with IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA and NetBeans, offering features like code completion and debugging. React Native also has strong tooling support with tools like Expo and Metro Bundler, providing a smooth development experience for JavaScript developers.

**6. Community and Ecosystem:** JavaFX has a mature community and ecosystem with a wide range of libraries and resources available for developers. React Native, being backed by Facebook, has a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources for developers.

In Summary, JavaFX and React Native differ in terms of architecture, language, platform support, user interface components, tooling, debugging, and community ecosystem.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

JavaFX	ReactNativeEverywhere
It is a set of graphics and media packages that enables developers to design, create, test, debug, and deploy rich client applications that operate consistently across diverse platforms.	Starter kit to target multiple platforms 🌐 📱 💻 with react-native' APIs. Cut out the time and effort it takes to setup the project(based on create-react-app). Achieve 'Write once use everywhere' with react-native (though react strictly says 'Learn once use anywhere').
Statistics
Stacks 280	Stacks 2
Followers 418	Followers 22
Votes 11	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 11 Light Cons 1 Community support less than qt 1 Complicated	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	React Native

What are some alternatives to JavaFX, ReactNativeEverywhere?

Electron

With Electron, creating a desktop application for your company or idea is easy. Initially developed for GitHub's Atom editor, Electron has since been used to create applications by companies like Microsoft, Facebook, Slack, and Docker. The Electron framework lets you write cross-platform desktop applications using JavaScript, HTML and CSS. It is based on io.js and Chromium and is used in the Atom editor.

Sciter

It brings a stack of web technologies to desktop UI development. Web designers, and developers, can reuse their experience and expertise in creating modern looking desktop applications.

wxWidgets

It is a C++ library that lets developers create applications for Windows, macOS, Linux and other platforms with a single code base. It has popular language bindings for Python, Perl, Ruby and many other languages, and unlike other cross-platform toolkits, it gives applications a truly native look and feel because it uses the platform's native API rather than emulating the GUI. It's also extensive, free, open-source and mature.

Qt5

It is a full development framework with tools designed to streamline the creation of applications and user interfaces for desktop, embedded, and mobile platforms.

React Native Desktop

Build OS X desktop apps using React Native.

JUCE

It is a C++ framework for low-latency applications, with cross-platform GUI libraries to get your apps running on Mac OS X, Windows, Linux, iOS and Android.

Proton Native

Create native desktop applications through a React syntax, on all platforms.

NodeGUI

It is an open source library for building cross-platform native desktop applications with JavaScript and CSS like styling. It is based on Qt5 and NOT chromium, hence it is memory and cpu efficient.

pygame

It is a cross-platform set of Python modules designed for writing video games. It includes computer graphics and sound libraries designed to be used with the Python programming language.

SDL

It is a cross-platform development library designed to provide low level access to audio, keyboard, mouse, joystick, and graphics hardware via OpenGL and Direct3D.

Related Comparisons

JavaFX vs ReactNativeEverywhere: What are the differences?

**Introduction:**
JavaFX and React Native are two popular technologies used for building user interfaces. While JavaFX is a framework for building desktop and mobile applications using Java, React Native is a framework for building cross-platform mobile applications using JavaScript.

**1. Architecture:** JavaFX follows a single-threaded architecture, where all UI updates are done on the JavaFX Application thread. On the other hand, React Native employs a multi-threaded architecture, utilizing separate threads for UI rendering and JavaScript execution, which can enhance performance and responsiveness.

**2. Language:** JavaFX requires knowledge of Java programming language for development, making it suitable for Java developers. React Native, on the other hand, uses JavaScript for development, which is a simpler language and allows for easier adoption by web developers.

**3. Platform Support:** JavaFX is primarily aimed at desktop applications but can also be used for mobile development. React Native, however, is specifically designed for cross-platform mobile development, supporting both Android and iOS platforms.

**4. User Interface Components:** JavaFX provides a comprehensive set of built-in UI components, making it easier to design user interfaces. React Native, on the other hand, relies on third-party libraries and components for UI design, offering more flexibility but requiring additional effort for implementation.

**5. Tooling and Debugging:** JavaFX has robust tooling support with IDEs like IntelliJ IDEA and NetBeans, offering features like code completion and debugging. React Native also has strong tooling support with tools like Expo and Metro Bundler, providing a smooth development experience for JavaScript developers.

**6. Community and Ecosystem:** JavaFX has a mature community and ecosystem with a wide range of libraries and resources available for developers. React Native, being backed by Facebook, has a large and active community, offering extensive documentation, tutorials, and support resources for developers.

In Summary, JavaFX and React Native differ in terms of architecture, language, platform support, user interface components, tooling, debugging, and community ecosystem.

JavaFX vs ReactNativeEverywhere

Overview