StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. JAWS vs Mono

JAWS vs Mono

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mono
Mono
Stacks94
Followers59
Votes1
GitHub Stars11.4K
Forks3.8K
JAWS
JAWS
Stacks6
Followers50
Votes2

JAWS vs Mono: What are the differences?

Developers describe JAWS as "Javascript + AWS Stack – A server-free, webapp boilerplate using bleeding-edge AWS services". The Javascript + AWS Stack – A server-free, webapp boilerplate using bleeding-edge AWS services that redefine how to build massively scalable web applications. On the other hand, Mono is detailed as "*Open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework *". It is a software platform designed to allow developers to easily create cross platform applications part of the .NET Foundation. It is an open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Runtime.

JAWS and Mono belong to "Frameworks (Full Stack)" category of the tech stack.

Some of the features offered by JAWS are:

  • Use No Servers: Never deal with scaling/deploying/maintaing/monitoring servers again.
  • Isolated Components: The JAWS back-end is comprised entirely of AWS Lambda Functions.
  • Scale Infinitely: A back-end comprised of Lambda functions comes with a ton of concurrency and you can easily enable multi-region redundancy.

On the other hand, Mono provides the following key features:

  • Cross platform
  • Open source
  • Implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework

JAWS and Mono are both open source tools. JAWS with 32K GitHub stars and 3.63K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Mono with 8.19K GitHub stars and 3.28K GitHub forks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mono
Mono
JAWS
JAWS

It is a software platform designed to allow developers to easily create cross platform applications part of the .NET Foundation. It is an open source implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework based on the ECMA standards for C# and the Common Language Runtime.

The Javascript + AWS Stack – A server-free, webapp boilerplate using bleeding-edge AWS services that redefine how to build massively scalable web applications

Cross platform ;Open source; Implementation of Microsoft's .NET Framework
Use No Servers: Never deal with scaling/deploying/maintaing/monitoring servers again.;Isolated Components: The JAWS back-end is comprised entirely of AWS Lambda Functions. ;Scale Infinitely: A back-end comprised of Lambda functions comes with a ton of concurrency and you can easily enable multi-region redundancy.;Be Cheap As Possible: Lambda functions run only when they are called, and you only pay for when they are run.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
3.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
94
Stacks
6
Followers
59
Followers
50
Votes
1
Votes
2
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1
    It was great, pre-dotnetcore
Pros
  • 2
    Heroku
Integrations
Entity Framework
Entity Framework
Mac OS X
Mac OS X
C#
C#
Windows
Windows
Debian
Debian
AWS Lambda
AWS Lambda
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon DynamoDB
Amazon API Gateway
Amazon API Gateway
Amazon S3
Amazon S3
JavaScript
JavaScript

What are some alternatives to Mono, JAWS?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase