StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Jersey vs Spark Framework

Jersey vs Spark Framework

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Jersey
Jersey
Stacks217
Followers125
Votes6
Spark Framework
Spark Framework
Stacks39
Followers91
Votes7
GitHub Stars9.7K
Forks1.6K

Jersey vs Spark Framework: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will compare Jersey and Spark Framework, two popular Java frameworks commonly used for building web applications.

  1. Programming Language Compatibility: Jersey is primarily used with Java, as it is a Java-based framework, while Spark Framework supports multiple programming languages including Java, Kotlin, and Scala. This allows developers with different language preferences to choose Spark Framework for their projects.

  2. Learning Curve: Jersey is known for its extensive and comprehensive documentation, making it easier for developers to learn. On the other hand, Spark Framework has a simpler and more lightweight architecture, which reduces the learning curve and makes it a popular choice among developers who prefer simplicity and minimalism.

  3. Ease of Configuration: Jersey follows a more traditional and XML-based approach for configuration. Developers need to create XML configuration files to define the application's resources and settings. In contrast, Spark Framework provides a more intuitive and code-based configuration, allowing developers to define routes and settings directly in their Java code, which can be more convenient and easier to manage for some.

  4. Scalability and Performance: Both Jersey and Spark Framework are considered to be scalable and performant. However, Spark Framework is known for its lightweight nature and fast startup time, making it a preferred choice for smaller projects or applications that require quick bootstrapping. Jersey, on the other hand, provides a more feature-rich environment and is suitable for larger and more complex projects.

  5. Community Support and Ecosystem: Jersey has been around for a longer time and has a larger user community, resulting in a wider range of community-driven resources, plugins, and examples available. This makes it easier for developers to find solutions and get support when using Jersey. While Spark Framework has a smaller community, it still has an active and growing ecosystem with dedicated contributors and community support.

  6. Integration and Compatibility: Spark Framework is known for its simplicity and easy integration with other libraries and frameworks, making it a good choice for microservice architectures or applications that require seamless integration with other components. Jersey, on the other hand, has excellent integration with Java EE standards and APIs, making it suitable for enterprise applications that rely heavily on Java EE technologies.

In Summary, Jersey and Spark Framework differ in terms of programming language compatibility, learning curve, configuration approach, scalability, community support, and integration capabilities. Developers can choose between the two based on their specific project requirements and preferences.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Jersey, Spark Framework

Juan José
Juan José

May 1, 2020

Decided

I developed Hexagon heavily inspired in these great tools because of the following reasons:

  • Take full advantage of the Kotlin programming language without any strings attached to Java (as a language).
  • I wanted to be able to replace the HTTP server library used with different adapters (Jetty, Netty, etc.) and though right now there is only one, more are coming.
  • Have a complete tool to do full applications, though you can use other libraries, Hexagon comes with a dependency injection helper, settings loading from different sources and HTTP Client, so it comes with (batteries included).

Right now I'm using it for my pet projects, and I'm happy with it.

35.9k views35.9k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Jersey
Jersey
Spark Framework
Spark Framework

It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.

It is a simple and expressive Java/Kotlin web framework DSL built for rapid development. Its intention is to provide an alternative for Kotlin/Java developers that want to develop their web applications as expressive as possible and with minimal boilerplate.

Track the JAX-RS API and provide regular releases of production quality Reference Implementations that ships with GlassFish; Provide APIs to extend Jersey & Build a community of users and developers; Make it easy to build RESTful Web services utilizing Java and the Java Virtual Machine.
Built for productivity; Lets you take full advantage of the JVM
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
9.7K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
1.6K
Stacks
217
Stacks
39
Followers
125
Followers
91
Votes
6
Votes
7
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 4
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Java standard
  • 1
    Fast Performance With Microservices
Pros
  • 2
    Very easy to get up and running. Lovely API
  • 1
    Easy
  • 1
    Ideal for microservices
  • 1
    Native paralelization
  • 1
    Java
Integrations
Oracle
Oracle
Java
Java
Apache Maven
Apache Maven
Java EE
Java EE
Eclipse
Eclipse
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java

What are some alternatives to Jersey, Spark Framework?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase