Jersey vs TypeORM

Overview

Jersey

Stacks217

Followers125

Votes6

TypeORM

Stacks757

Followers813

Votes81

GitHub Stars36.0K

Forks6.5K

Jersey vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

1. **Language Compatibility**: Jersey is a Java-based framework that is specifically designed for building RESTful web services in Java, while TypeORM is a TypeScript-based Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) library that works with various SQL databases. 2. **Database Support**: Jersey does not provide built-in support for database operations, whereas TypeORM is specifically designed to handle database operations like querying, inserting, updating, and deleting records. 3. **Type Safety**: TypeORM is type-safe and leverages TypeScript's static typing system to ensure type safety during development, whereas Jersey relies on Java's type system which is not as robust as TypeScript. 4. **Schema Creation**: TypeORM uses decorators to define entity schemas, which are then automatically converted into database tables; however, Jersey does not have a built-in mechanism for creating database schemas. 5. **Structural Differences**: Jersey follows the JAX-RS standard for implementing RESTful services, while TypeORM focuses on providing an ORM solution that simplifies database interactions in TypeScript applications.

In Summary, Jersey and TypeORM differ in language compatibility, database support, type safety, schema creation, and structural implementation.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Jersey	TypeORM
It is open source, production quality, framework for developing RESTful Web Services in Java that provides support for JAX-RS APIs and serves as a JAX-RS (JSR 311 & JSR 339) Reference Implementation. It provides it’s own API that extend the JAX-RS toolkit with additional features and utilities to further simplify RESTful service and client development.	It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.
Track the JAX-RS API and provide regular releases of production quality Reference Implementations that ships with GlassFish; Provide APIs to extend Jersey & Build a community of users and developers; Make it easy to build RESTful Web services utilizing Java and the Java Virtual Machine.	automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.
Statistics
GitHub Stars -	GitHub Stars 36.0K
GitHub Forks -	GitHub Forks 6.5K
Stacks 217	Stacks 757
Followers 125	Followers 813
Votes 6	Votes 81
Pros & Cons
Pros 4 Lightweight 1 Java standard 1 Fast Performance With Microservices	Pros 30 Typescript 12 Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser 9 Cons of TypeORM 9 Easy setup 7 Promise Based Cons 5 Completely abandoned by its creator 3 Too complex for what it does 2 Doesn't really support native javascript 1 Not proper/real type safety 1 Cannot use query on any relation
Integrations
Oracle Java Apache Maven Java EE Eclipse	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Jersey, TypeORM?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.