StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. JHipster vs Martini

JHipster vs Martini

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Martini
Martini
Stacks16
Followers37
Votes15
GitHub Stars11.6K
Forks1.1K
JHipster
JHipster
Stacks200
Followers327
Votes0
GitHub Stars22.2K
Forks4.1K

JHipster vs Martini: What are the differences?

  1. Code Generation: JHipster focuses on generating a full-stack application with Java, Spring Boot, and Angular/React, while Martini is a lightweight and flexible framework for building microservices in Go.

  2. Technology Stack: JHipster provides a predefined technology stack with options for customization, whereas Martini allows developers to choose the technologies they prefer for building microservices.

  3. Community Support: JHipster has a large and active community that offers extensive documentation, tutorials, and support, whereas Martini has a smaller community with limited resources available.

  4. Scalability: JHipster is designed for scalable and complex applications with its integrated support for caching, database sharding, and load balancing, while Martini is more suitable for smaller, less complex microservices.

  5. Language: JHipster primarily uses Java for backend development and Angular/React for frontend, while Martini is built on the Go programming language for both backend development and frontend if using WebAssembly.

  6. Configuration: JHipster simplifies configuration with its built-in tools and generators, making it easier for developers to set up and start a project, whereas Martini requires more manual configuration and setup due to its lightweight nature.

In Summary, the key differences between JHipster and Martini lie in their code generation approach, technology stack, community support, scalability, programming language, and configuration options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Martini
Martini
JHipster
JHipster

Martini is a powerful package for quickly writing modular web applications/services in Golang.

It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
11.6K
GitHub Stars
22.2K
GitHub Forks
1.1K
GitHub Forks
4.1K
Stacks
16
Stacks
200
Followers
37
Followers
327
Votes
15
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 6
    Go
  • 4
    Simple
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Express/Sinatra style framework
  • 1
    Flexible Routing
No community feedback yet
Integrations
Golang
Golang
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Martini, JHipster?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase