StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. JHipster vs RichFaces

JHipster vs RichFaces

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JHipster
JHipster
Stacks200
Followers327
Votes0
GitHub Stars22.2K
Forks4.1K
RichFaces
RichFaces
Stacks8
Followers7
Votes0
GitHub Stars68
Forks98

JHipster vs RichFaces: What are the differences?

# Key Differences between JHipster and RichFaces

JHipster is a development platform to generate, develop and deploy Spring Boot + Angular/React/Vue web applications whereas RichFaces is a JavaServer Faces (JSF) component library that simplifies the development of web applications. 
1. **Architecture**: JHipster utilizes the microservices architecture pattern for scalability and flexibility while RichFaces is more focused on providing ready-to-use UI components for JavaServer Faces development projects. 
2. **Development Stack**: JHipster provides a full-stack development environment with support for backend (Spring Boot) and frontend (Angular/React/Vue) technologies, whereas RichFaces primarily focuses on frontend UI components for JavaServer Faces applications.
3. **Community Support**: JHipster has a large and active community with regular updates and contributions, while RichFaces has a smaller community due to its niche focus on JavaServer Faces development.
4. **Integration**: JHipster seamlessly integrates with various popular technologies and tools such as Docker, Kubernetes, and AWS for modern web application development, while RichFaces is more tightly integrated with JavaServer Faces technology stack.
5. **Customization**: JHipster allows extensive customization through its generator options and plugins for tailoring the application to specific requirements, whereas RichFaces offers a set of predefined UI components with limited customization options.
6. **Project Maturity**: JHipster is a relatively newer project that rapidly evolves with the latest trends and features in web development, while RichFaces has been around for a longer period and may have a more stable codebase.

In Summary, JHipster and RichFaces differ in architecture, development stack, community support, integration capabilities, customization options, and project maturity.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JHipster
JHipster
RichFaces
RichFaces

It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.

It is an advanced UI component framework for easily integrating Ajax capabilities into business applications using JSF.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.2K
GitHub Stars
68
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
98
Stacks
200
Stacks
8
Followers
327
Followers
7
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
.NET Core
.NET Core
.NET
.NET
ASP.NET
ASP.NET
C#
C#

What are some alternatives to JHipster, RichFaces?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase