StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. JHipster vs Tower Web

JHipster vs Tower Web

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

JHipster
JHipster
Stacks200
Followers327
Votes0
GitHub Stars22.2K
Forks4.1K
Tower Web
Tower Web
Stacks1
Followers5
Votes0
GitHub Stars981
Forks53

JHipster vs Tower Web: What are the differences?

# Introduction

JHipster and Tower Web are two different frameworks used for web development with unique features and functionalities.

1. **Language Support**: JHipster is primarily based on Java, whereas Tower Web is based on Rust, offering developers the flexibility to choose a language best suited for their project requirements.
2. **Technology Stack**: JHipster integrates popular technologies like Spring Boot, Angular, and React, providing a full-stack solution out of the box, whereas Tower Web focuses on a leaner stack, emphasizing performance with Rust and minimal dependencies.
3. **Community Ecosystem**: JHipster has a large and active community support with extensive documentation, plugins, and a wide range of available generators, whereas Tower Web, being a newer framework, has a smaller community but growing steadily with a focus on performance optimization and code quality.
4. **Code Generation**: JHipster is known for its robust code generation capabilities, enabling rapid application development with pre-configured setups and boilerplate code, while Tower Web follows a more manual approach with a focus on developer control and customization.
5. **Ease of Use**: JHipster streamlines the development process by providing a set of predefined tools, configurations, and best practices, making it easier for developers to get started with project setup compared to Tower Web, which requires a deeper understanding of Rust and manual configuration setup.
6. **Scalability**: JHipster supports scalability through microservices architecture and seamless integration with cloud services like Kubernetes, whereas Tower Web, being lightweight and performance-focused, may require additional considerations for scaling larger applications efficiently.

In Summary, JHipster and Tower Web differ in terms of language support, technology stack, community ecosystem, code generation approach, ease of use, and scalability, catering to diverse developer needs and project requirements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

JHipster
JHipster
Tower Web
Tower Web

It is a free and open-source application generator used to quickly develop modern web applications and Microservices using Spring Boot + Angular / React / Vue.

Tower Web aims to decouple all HTTP concepts from the application logic. You define a "plain old Rust method" (PORM?). This method takes only the data it needs to complete and returns a struct representing the response. Tower Web does the rest.

-
Fast: Fully asynchronous, built on Tokio and Hyper.;Ergonomic: Tower-web decouples HTTP from your application logic, removing all boilerplate.;Works on Rust stable: You can use it today.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
22.2K
GitHub Stars
981
GitHub Forks
4.1K
GitHub Forks
53
Stacks
200
Stacks
1
Followers
327
Followers
5
Votes
0
Votes
0
Integrations
No integrations available
Rust
Rust

What are some alternatives to JHipster, Tower Web?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase