Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
jQuery vs momentjs: What are the differences?
Introduction
jQuery and momentjs are both popular JavaScript libraries used for manipulating and interacting with dates and time. While they have some similarities, there are key differences between the two.
Syntax and Ease of Use: jQuery focuses on simplifying and optimizing the process of selecting and manipulating HTML elements in webpages, while momentjs is solely dedicated to handling and formatting dates and time. jQuery provides an easy-to-use syntax for traversing and manipulating the DOM, while momentjs offers a comprehensive set of methods for handling date and time-related operations.
Size and Performance: jQuery is a larger library compared to momentjs, which means it requires more bandwidth to load on a webpage. On the other hand, momentjs is a lightweight library specifically designed for efficient date and time manipulation. This can result in faster page loading times when using momentjs compared to jQuery.
Functionality: jQuery provides a wide range of features beyond date and time manipulation, such as AJAX requests, animations, and event handling. In contrast, momentjs focuses solely on date and time manipulation, offering a rich set of methods for parsing, formatting, manipulating, and comparing dates and times without the additional functionalities provided by jQuery.
Localization and Internationalization: momentjs has built-in support for localization and internationalization, allowing developers to easily format dates and times in different languages and regions. It provides customizable locale settings, including date and time formats, week start day, and month names. jQuery does not provide built-in localization support for dates and times.
Accessibility: jQuery is widely used and has a vast community of developers, which means it has extensive accessibility features and resources available. In contrast, momentjs is a specialized library focused on date and time operations, so it may not have the same level of accessibility support as jQuery.
Browser Compatibility: jQuery is designed to be compatible with a wide range of browsers, including older versions. It provides a consistent API across different browsers, ensuring consistent behavior. On the other hand, momentjs has fewer browser compatibility concerns since it focuses solely on date and time manipulation. However, it may still have some browser compatibility issues, especially in older or less commonly used browsers.
In summary, jQuery and momentjs are both powerful JavaScript libraries, but they have distinct focuses and functionalities. jQuery is primarily used for general DOM manipulation and includes features beyond date and time manipulation, while momentjs is dedicated solely to handling and formatting dates and times. The choice between the two depends on the specific requirements of the project and the need for additional functionalities beyond date and time operations.
The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!
What do you think?
I've an eCommerce platform building using Laravel, MySQL and jQuery. It's working good and if anyone become interested, I just deploy the entire source cod e in environment / Hosting. This is not a good model of course. Because everyone ask for small or large amount of change and I had to do this. Imagine when there will be 100 separate deploy and I had to manage 100 separate source. So How do I make my system architecture so that I'll have a core / base source code. To make any any change / update on specific deployment, it will be theme / plugin / extension based . Also if I introduce an API layer then I could handle the Web, Mobile App and POS as well ? Is the API should be part of source code or a individual single API and all the deployment will use that API ?
When I started TipMe, I thought about using React frontend. At the end, plain, simple jQuery won.
I had to build this iteration of the site fast and by using jQuery I could keep using Django as a full stack development tool. One important point is Django form (combined with Django Bootstrap3) means that I don't have to reinvent form rendering again, which will be the case with React.
Over time, more interactivity seeped into the site and React components start making its way into the codebase.
I now wish the site is built using React so that I could add more user friendly interfaces easier (no more fuddling with server states) but I would still say jQuery helped me get past those early days.
Pros of jQuery
- Cross-browser1.3K
- Dom manipulation957
- Power809
- Open source660
- Plugins610
- Easy459
- Popular395
- Feature-rich350
- Html5281
- Light weight227
- Simple93
- Great community84
- CSS3 Compliant79
- Mobile friendly69
- Fast67
- Intuitive43
- Swiss Army knife for webdev42
- Huge Community35
- Easy to learn11
- Clean code4
- Because of Ajax request :)3
- Powerful2
- Nice2
- Just awesome2
- Used everywhere2
- Improves productivity1
- Javascript1
- Easy Setup1
- Open Source, Simple, Easy Setup1
- It Just Works1
- Industry acceptance1
- Allows great manipulation of HTML and CSS1
- Widely Used1
- I love jQuery1
Pros of Moment.js
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of jQuery
- Large size6
- Sometimes inconsistent API5
- Encourages DOM as primary data source5
- Live events is overly complex feature2