JSF vs ZK

Overview

Stacks35

Followers48

Votes6

JSF

Stacks138

Followers223

Votes4

JSF vs ZK: What are the differences?

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs. ZK Comparison

JavaServer Faces (JSF) and ZK are both popular Java web frameworks that are used for building web applications. While they both aim to simplify the development process, there are key differences between the two that developers should consider when choosing the right framework for their project.

Component Model: One of the main differences between JSF and ZK is their component model. JSF uses a component-based architecture, where UI components are first-class citizens and are defined in the application's Facelets files. In contrast, ZK follows a more event-driven approach, where components are instantiated in a hierarchical structure and events are used to trigger actions.
Server-side Processing: JSF relies heavily on server-side processing, as each interaction with a JSF application requires a round trip to the server. This can lead to slower response times, especially for applications with complex interactions. On the other hand, ZK provides client-side processing capabilities, enabling more dynamic and responsive user interfaces.
Ease of Use: JSF follows the convention over configuration principle, making it easy to get started with minimal configuration. ZK, on the other hand, requires explicit configuration for components and their behaviors, which can be more time-consuming for developers. This difference in ease of use can impact the learning curve for new developers.
Integration with JavaScript: While both frameworks support integrating JavaScript code into web applications, ZK provides better support for seamlessly integrating client-side JavaScript with server-side Java code. This can be beneficial for developers who need to leverage JavaScript for complex client-side interactions in their applications.
Component Flexibility: ZK offers a wider range of out-of-the-box components and themes compared to JSF, making it easier for developers to customize the look and feel of their applications. Additionally, ZK provides a rich set of built-in AJAX capabilities, allowing developers to create more interactive and responsive user interfaces without writing extensive JavaScript code.
Performance: When it comes to performance, ZK is known for its efficient handling of client-server communication and rendering, resulting in faster response times and better overall performance compared to JSF. This can be a crucial factor for applications requiring high levels of interactivity and real-time updates.

In Summary, JavaServer Faces (JSF) and ZK have distinct differences in their component models, server-side processing, ease of use, JavaScript integration, component flexibility, and performance, which developers should consider when selecting a framework for their web applications.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

ZK	JSF
It is renowned for "Ajax without JavaScript", enabling developers to build rich Web applications without any knowledge of Ajax and JavaScript. It is used for building enterprise web and mobile apps.	It is used for building component-based user interfaces for web applications and was formalized as a standard through the Java Community
jQuery, Spring, JPA, Hibernate, JavaEE, Grails, Scala	-
Statistics
Stacks 35	Stacks 138
Followers 48	Followers 223
Votes 6	Votes 4
Pros & Cons
Pros 1 Example packages 1 Open Source 1 Compatibility 1 Components 1 Performance	Pros 2 Rich and comprehensive Request Life-cycle 1 Server Side component 1 Very Mature UI framework
Integrations
Scala Spring Boot Spring Security jQuery Grails Java EE	Java Java EE

What are some alternatives to ZK, JSF?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Related Comparisons

JSF vs ZK: What are the differences?

JavaServer Faces (JSF) vs. ZK Comparison

Component Model: One of the main differences between JSF and ZK is their component model. JSF uses a component-based architecture, where UI components are first-class citizens and are defined in the application's Facelets files. In contrast, ZK follows a more event-driven approach, where components are instantiated in a hierarchical structure and events are used to trigger actions.
Server-side Processing: JSF relies heavily on server-side processing, as each interaction with a JSF application requires a round trip to the server. This can lead to slower response times, especially for applications with complex interactions. On the other hand, ZK provides client-side processing capabilities, enabling more dynamic and responsive user interfaces.
Ease of Use: JSF follows the convention over configuration principle, making it easy to get started with minimal configuration. ZK, on the other hand, requires explicit configuration for components and their behaviors, which can be more time-consuming for developers. This difference in ease of use can impact the learning curve for new developers.
Integration with JavaScript: While both frameworks support integrating JavaScript code into web applications, ZK provides better support for seamlessly integrating client-side JavaScript with server-side Java code. This can be beneficial for developers who need to leverage JavaScript for complex client-side interactions in their applications.
Component Flexibility: ZK offers a wider range of out-of-the-box components and themes compared to JSF, making it easier for developers to customize the look and feel of their applications. Additionally, ZK provides a rich set of built-in AJAX capabilities, allowing developers to create more interactive and responsive user interfaces without writing extensive JavaScript code.
Performance: When it comes to performance, ZK is known for its efficient handling of client-server communication and rendering, resulting in faster response times and better overall performance compared to JSF. This can be a crucial factor for applications requiring high levels of interactivity and real-time updates.

JSF vs ZK

Overview

JSF vs ZK: What are the differences?