Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

Apache Storm

201
281
+ 1
25
Kafka Streams

392
472
+ 1
0
Add tool

Apache Storm vs Kafka Streams: What are the differences?

Introduction

Apache Storm and Kafka Streams are both widely used open-source frameworks for processing real-time data in big data applications. While they have some similarities in terms of their ability to handle streaming data, there are several key differences between them.

  1. Architecture: Apache Storm follows a distributed and fault-tolerant architecture known as the master/worker model, where a cluster manager (master) assigns tasks to a set of worker nodes. On the other hand, Kafka Streams provides a simple library that runs on top of the Kafka broker, enabling applications to process data directly within the Kafka cluster. This difference in architecture impacts various aspects of their use cases, scalability, and fault tolerance.

  2. Data Processing Paradigm: Apache Storm focuses on stream processing and provides a low-level API for handling complex event processing, allowing users to build custom processing logic. In contrast, Kafka Streams is designed as a lightweight stream processing library that leverages Kafka's messaging model and provides high-level abstractions such as streams and tables. This makes Kafka Streams more user-friendly for developers who prefer a declarative programming approach.

  3. Fault Tolerance: Both Apache Storm and Kafka Streams offer fault tolerance capabilities, but the mechanisms differ. Apache Storm ensures fault tolerance through parallelism and replication of processing tasks across worker nodes. In case of failures, the failed tasks are automatically reassigned to other available workers. On the other hand, Kafka Streams leverages the fault tolerance provided by Kafka itself, which includes replication and data durability through distributed commit logs. If a Kafka Streams application fails, it can restart and resume processing from where it left off, ensuring fault tolerance.

  4. Scalability: Apache Storm allows users to scale their processing capabilities by adding more worker nodes to the cluster dynamically. This horizontal scalability is a crucial feature in scenarios where the rate of incoming data increases. Kafka Streams, being tightly integrated with Kafka, leverages Kafka's scalability by automatically parallelizing the processing tasks based on the number of Kafka partitions. This makes it easy to scale the Kafka Streams application simply by increasing the number of Kafka partitions.

  5. State Management: Apache Storm does not provide built-in support for state management. Instead, users have to rely on external systems like Apache HBase or Apache Cassandra to handle the state storage. In comparison, Kafka Streams offers built-in state management, allowing the applications to maintain and query the internal state. This simplifies the overall system architecture as users do not need to manage an external state store separately.

  6. Integration with Ecosystem: Apache Storm is designed to work with various data sources and sinks, including Kafka, Hadoop, and databases, making it a versatile solution for data ingestion and processing. Kafka Streams, as a part of the Kafka ecosystem, integrates seamlessly with Kafka, enabling users to read from Kafka topics and write back to Kafka topics. This tight integration makes Kafka Streams an ideal choice for applications where Kafka is already being used as a messaging platform.

In summary, Apache Storm and Kafka Streams differ in their architecture, data processing paradigm, fault tolerance mechanisms, scalability options, state management, and integration with the broader ecosystem. While Apache Storm provides a low-level framework for complex event processing, Kafka Streams offers a lightweight stream processing library with high-level abstractions, making it easier to use. Both frameworks have their strengths and can be chosen based on specific application requirements and the existing technology stack.

Get Advice from developers at your company using StackShare Enterprise. Sign up for StackShare Enterprise.
Learn More
Pros of Apache Storm
Pros of Kafka Streams
  • 10
    Flexible
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Event Processing
  • 3
    Clojure
  • 2
    Real Time
    Be the first to leave a pro

    Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

    No Stats
    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is Apache Storm?

    Apache Storm is a free and open source distributed realtime computation system. Storm makes it easy to reliably process unbounded streams of data, doing for realtime processing what Hadoop did for batch processing. Storm has many use cases: realtime analytics, online machine learning, continuous computation, distributed RPC, ETL, and more. Storm is fast: a benchmark clocked it at over a million tuples processed per second per node. It is scalable, fault-tolerant, guarantees your data will be processed, and is easy to set up and operate.

    What is Kafka Streams?

    It is a client library for building applications and microservices, where the input and output data are stored in Kafka clusters. It combines the simplicity of writing and deploying standard Java and Scala applications on the client side with the benefits of Kafka's server-side cluster technology.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    What companies use Apache Storm?
    What companies use Kafka Streams?
    See which teams inside your own company are using Apache Storm or Kafka Streams.
    Sign up for StackShare EnterpriseLearn More

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with Apache Storm?
    What tools integrate with Kafka Streams?

    Blog Posts

    Jun 24 2020 at 4:42PM

    Pinterest

    Amazon S3KafkaHBase+4
    4
    1204
    What are some alternatives to Apache Storm and Kafka Streams?
    Apache Spark
    Spark is a fast and general processing engine compatible with Hadoop data. It can run in Hadoop clusters through YARN or Spark's standalone mode, and it can process data in HDFS, HBase, Cassandra, Hive, and any Hadoop InputFormat. It is designed to perform both batch processing (similar to MapReduce) and new workloads like streaming, interactive queries, and machine learning.
    Kafka
    Kafka is a distributed, partitioned, replicated commit log service. It provides the functionality of a messaging system, but with a unique design.
    Amazon Kinesis
    Amazon Kinesis can collect and process hundreds of gigabytes of data per second from hundreds of thousands of sources, allowing you to easily write applications that process information in real-time, from sources such as web site click-streams, marketing and financial information, manufacturing instrumentation and social media, and operational logs and metering data.
    Apache Flume
    It is a distributed, reliable, and available service for efficiently collecting, aggregating, and moving large amounts of log data. It has a simple and flexible architecture based on streaming data flows. It is robust and fault tolerant with tunable reliability mechanisms and many failover and recovery mechanisms. It uses a simple extensible data model that allows for online analytic application.
    Apache Flink
    Apache Flink is an open source system for fast and versatile data analytics in clusters. Flink supports batch and streaming analytics, in one system. Analytical programs can be written in concise and elegant APIs in Java and Scala.
    See all alternatives