Kendo UI vs React vs Vue.js

Overview

React

Stacks182.6K

Followers147.0K

Votes4.1K

GitHub Stars240.3K

Forks49.7K

Kendo UI

Stacks297

Followers359

Votes33

GitHub Stars2.6K

Forks1.9K

Vue.js

Stacks55.5K

Followers44.7K

Votes1.6K

GitHub Stars209.7K

Forks33.8K

Kendo UI vs React vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Development Approach: Kendo UI follows a traditional JavaScript approach, where developers need to write code manually to achieve functionalities. On the other hand, React and Vue.js follow a component-based approach, allowing developers to create reusable components and use them to build the user interface. This difference in development approach makes Kendo UI less flexible and harder to maintain compared to React and Vue.js.
Learning Curve: Kendo UI requires developers to learn its own set of APIs and concepts, which can take a significant amount of time. React and Vue.js, on the other hand, have a relatively smaller learning curve as they leverage popular JavaScript libraries (React uses JSX and Vue.js uses HTML-like templates) that developers are likely already familiar with. This makes it easier and faster for developers to get started with React and Vue.js compared to Kendo UI.
Performance: Kendo UI is built on top of jQuery, which can sometimes result in performance overhead due to its heavy DOM manipulation. React and Vue.js, on the other hand, have optimized virtual DOM implementations, allowing for efficient updates and rendering of components. This leads to better performance in terms of speed and responsiveness compared to Kendo UI.
Community and Ecosystem: React and Vue.js have a larger and more active community compared to Kendo UI. This means that developers using React and Vue.js can benefit from a wider range of resources, libraries, and community support. Kendo UI, being a commercial product, has a smaller and less active community, limiting the resources and support available to developers.
Integration with Other Libraries and Frameworks: React and Vue.js are more flexible when it comes to integration with other libraries and frameworks. They can easily be used alongside other JavaScript libraries or frameworks, such as Redux for state management or Vue Router for routing. Kendo UI, on the other hand, is a self-contained package and may not integrate as smoothly with other libraries or frameworks, requiring additional effort and workarounds for integration.
Data Binding and State Management: React and Vue.js provide more advanced and efficient mechanisms for data binding and state management. React uses a unidirectional data flow and provides tools like React Hooks and Context API for managing state. Vue.js offers a powerful reactivity system and features like computed properties and watchers. Kendo UI, although it provides data binding capabilities, may not offer the same level of flexibility and efficiency in managing application state.

In summary, Kendo UI is a traditional JavaScript library that requires manual coding, has a steeper learning curve, may suffer from performance issues, has a smaller community and ecosystem, may not integrate as smoothly with other libraries or frameworks, and may not provide the same level of advanced data binding and state management compared to React and Vue.js.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on React, Kendo UI, Vue.js

John Clifford

Software Engineer at CircleYY

Jun 8, 2020

Decided

I used React not just because it is more popular than Angular. But the declarative and composition it gives out of the box is fascinating and React.js is just a very small UI library and you can build anything on top of it.

Composing components is the strongest asset of React for me as it can breakdown your application into smaller pieces which makes it easy to reuse and scale.

455k views455k

Comments

Máté

Senior developer at Self-employed

May 28, 2020

Decided

Svelte is everything a developer could ever want for flexible, scalable frontend development. I feel like React has reached a maturity level where there needs to be new syntactic sugar added (I'm looking at you, hooks!). I love how Svelte sets out to rebuild a new language to write interfaces in from the ground up.

311k views311k

Comments

Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

React	Kendo UI	Vue.js
Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.	Fast, light, complete: 70+ jQuery-based UI widgets in one powerful toolset. AngularJS integration, Bootstrap support, mobile controls, offline data solution.	It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.
Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere	Ultimate Performance with Minimum Resources;Mobile-Friendly and Responsive;Built-In, Customizable Themes ;Open Source Core	Reactivity; Components; Modularity; Animations; Routing; Stability; Extendable Data bindings; Plain JS object models; Build UI by composing components; Mix & matching small libraries
Statistics
GitHub Stars 240.3K	GitHub Stars 2.6K	GitHub Stars 209.7K
GitHub Forks 49.7K	GitHub Forks 1.9K	GitHub Forks 33.8K
Stacks 182.6K	Stacks 297	Stacks 55.5K
Followers 147.0K	Followers 359	Followers 44.7K
Votes 4.1K	Votes 33	Votes 1.6K
Pros & Cons
Pros 837 Components 674 Virtual dom 579 Performance 509 Simplicity 442 Composable Cons 41 Requires discipline to keep architecture organized 30 No predefined way to structure your app 29 Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages 13 JSX 10 Not enterprise friendly	Pros 15 Collection of controls 5 Speed 4 Multi-framework support 4 Mobile 2 AngularJS Cons 4 Massive footprint 3 Slow 1 Awdawd 1 Spotty Documentation 1 Expensive	Pros 294 Simple and easy to start with 230 Good documentation 196 Components 131 Simple the best 100 Simplified AngularJS Cons 9 Less Common Place 5 YXMLvsHTML Markup 3 Don't support fragments 3 Only support programatically multiple root nodes
Integrations
No integrations available	Bootstrap AngularJS	No integrations available

What are some alternatives to React, Kendo UI, Vue.js?

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Ember.js

A JavaScript framework that does all of the heavy lifting that you'd normally have to do by hand. There are tasks that are common to every web app; It does those things for you, so you can focus on building killer features and UI.

Backbone.js

Backbone supplies structure to JavaScript-heavy applications by providing models key-value binding and custom events, collections with a rich API of enumerable functions, views with declarative event handling, and connects it all to your existing application over a RESTful JSON interface.

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Angular

It is a TypeScript-based open-source web application framework. It is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications.

Aurelia

Aurelia is a next generation JavaScript client framework that leverages simple conventions to empower your creativity.

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Related Comparisons

Kendo UI vs React vs Vue.js: What are the differences?

Development Approach: Kendo UI follows a traditional JavaScript approach, where developers need to write code manually to achieve functionalities. On the other hand, React and Vue.js follow a component-based approach, allowing developers to create reusable components and use them to build the user interface. This difference in development approach makes Kendo UI less flexible and harder to maintain compared to React and Vue.js.
Learning Curve: Kendo UI requires developers to learn its own set of APIs and concepts, which can take a significant amount of time. React and Vue.js, on the other hand, have a relatively smaller learning curve as they leverage popular JavaScript libraries (React uses JSX and Vue.js uses HTML-like templates) that developers are likely already familiar with. This makes it easier and faster for developers to get started with React and Vue.js compared to Kendo UI.
Performance: Kendo UI is built on top of jQuery, which can sometimes result in performance overhead due to its heavy DOM manipulation. React and Vue.js, on the other hand, have optimized virtual DOM implementations, allowing for efficient updates and rendering of components. This leads to better performance in terms of speed and responsiveness compared to Kendo UI.
Community and Ecosystem: React and Vue.js have a larger and more active community compared to Kendo UI. This means that developers using React and Vue.js can benefit from a wider range of resources, libraries, and community support. Kendo UI, being a commercial product, has a smaller and less active community, limiting the resources and support available to developers.
Integration with Other Libraries and Frameworks: React and Vue.js are more flexible when it comes to integration with other libraries and frameworks. They can easily be used alongside other JavaScript libraries or frameworks, such as Redux for state management or Vue Router for routing. Kendo UI, on the other hand, is a self-contained package and may not integrate as smoothly with other libraries or frameworks, requiring additional effort and workarounds for integration.
Data Binding and State Management: React and Vue.js provide more advanced and efficient mechanisms for data binding and state management. React uses a unidirectional data flow and provides tools like React Hooks and Context API for managing state. Vue.js offers a powerful reactivity system and features like computed properties and watchers. Kendo UI, although it provides data binding capabilities, may not offer the same level of flexibility and efficiency in managing application state.

Kendo UI vs React vs Vue.js

Overview