StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtual Machine Management
  5. KVM vs XenServer

KVM vs XenServer

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

XenServer
XenServer
Stacks52
Followers57
Votes0
KVM
KVM
Stacks189
Followers234
Votes8

KVM vs XenServer: What are the differences?

Introduction

Here, we will explore the key differences between KVM and XenServer, two popular virtualization technologies.

  1. Hypervisor Type: KVM (Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution, whereas XenServer is a hybrid hypervisor that supports both paravirtualization and full virtualization. KVM virtualizes the hardware resources directly using the host's kernel, while XenServer uses a hypervisor layer between the host operating system and the virtual machines.

  2. Platform Support: KVM is primarily a Linux-based virtualization solution and works best on Linux platforms. On the other hand, XenServer is a hypervisor that can run on multiple operating systems, including Linux, Windows, and FreeBSD. It provides broader platform support compared to KVM.

  3. Management Tools: KVM relies on open-source management tools like libvirt and virt-manager for managing virtual machines. XenServer, on the other hand, offers a proprietary management tool called XenCenter. XenCenter provides a user-friendly GUI and advanced management features like live migration and high availability, making it more suitable for enterprise environments.

  4. Performance: KVM leverages hardware virtualization extensions (Intel VT and AMD-V) to provide near-native performance. This allows KVM to achieve better performance compared to XenServer, especially for workloads that require high CPU utilization. However, XenServer's paravirtualization approach can offer better overall performance in certain scenarios, especially when running multiple virtual machines on a single host.

  5. Virtualization Overhead: KVM has a relatively low virtualization overhead since it runs virtual machines directly on the host operating system. On the other hand, XenServer introduces an additional layer (the hypervisor) between the host and the virtual machines, which can potentially impact performance to some extent. However, the actual overhead may vary depending on factors like workload type and system configuration.

  6. Licensing: KVM is an open-source virtualization solution and is included in the Linux kernel. It is available for free and has no licensing costs. XenServer, on the other hand, has a commercial license model. While it offers a free version called XenServer Free, certain advanced features and support require a paid license.

In summary, KVM is a full virtualization solution primarily focused on Linux platforms, while XenServer is a hybrid hypervisor with broader platform support. KVM provides better performance and has lower virtualization overhead, while XenServer offers advanced management tools, paravirtualization capability, and a commercial licensing model.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

XenServer
XenServer
KVM
KVM

It is a leading virtualization management platform optimized for application, desktop and server virtualization infrastructures. It is used in the world's largest clouds and enterprises.

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Statistics
Stacks
52
Stacks
189
Followers
57
Followers
234
Votes
0
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 4
    No license issues
  • 2
    Flexible network options
  • 2
    Very fast

What are some alternatives to XenServer, KVM?

Vagrant

Vagrant

Vagrant provides the framework and configuration format to create and manage complete portable development environments. These development environments can live on your computer or in the cloud, and are portable between Windows, Mac OS X, and Linux.

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

boot2docker

boot2docker

boot2docker is a lightweight Linux distribution based on Tiny Core Linux made specifically to run Docker containers. It runs completely from RAM, weighs ~27MB and boots in ~5s (YMMV).

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

VMware vSphere

VMware vSphere

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

Otto

Otto

Otto automatically builds development environments without any configuration; it can detect your project type and has built-in knowledge of industry-standard tools to setup a development environment that is ready to go. When you're ready to deploy, otto builds and manages an infrastructure, sets up servers, builds, and deploys the application.

libvirt

libvirt

It is an open-source API, daemon and management tool for managing platform virtualization. It can be used to manage KVM, Xen, VMware ESXi, QEMU and other virtualization technologies.

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Azk

Azk

azk lets developers easily and quickly install and configure development environments on their computers.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana