Lagom Framework vs Spring

Overview

Spring

Stacks3.9K

Followers4.8K

Votes1.1K

GitHub Stars59.1K

Forks38.8K

Lagom Framework

Stacks36

Followers69

Votes0

GitHub Stars2.6K

Forks627

Lagom Framework vs Spring: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between the Lagom Framework and Spring, highlighting key differences between the two technologies.

Architecture: Lagom is built on the reactive principles and follows the CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) pattern, while Spring is a comprehensive application development framework. This difference in architecture determines the scalability, performance, and fault tolerance of the applications built on each framework.
Ease of Use: Lagom offers a more opinionated approach with consistent project structure and predefined conventions, making it easier to get started and follow best practices. Spring, on the other hand, provides more flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to choose and configure different modules as per their requirements.
Concurrency Model: Lagom incorporates the Reactive Streams API, which supports asynchronous and non-blocking communication between services. Spring, on the other hand, utilizes its own concurrency model and provides various threading models and abstractions for concurrent programming.
Service Discovery: Lagom has built-in support for service discovery using Lightbend's ConductR or Kubernetes, simplifying the management and discovery of microservices. In contrast, Spring requires the use of additional libraries or tools like Eureka or Consul to achieve similar functionality.
Testing Capabilities: Lagom provides a set of testing utilities specifically designed for testing microservices, including service mocks and integration testing support. Spring, being a comprehensive framework, offers a wide range of testing options, including unit testing, integration testing, and performance testing.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring has a large and mature community with extensive documentation, resources, and support. It has a wide ecosystem of libraries and tools that integrate well with the framework, providing developers with a rich set of options. Lagom, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community and ecosystem, although it is growing rapidly.

In Summary, Lagom and Spring differ in their architecture, ease of use, concurrency model, service discovery, testing capabilities, and community/ecosystem support.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Spring, Lagom Framework

Kamrul

Aug 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

Django

Spring Boot

I am a graduate student working as a software engineer in a company. For my personal development, I want to learn web development. I have some experience in Springboot while I was in university. So I want to continue with spring-boot, but I heard about Django. I'm reaching out to the experts here to help me choose a future proof framework. Django or Spring Boot?

Thanks in Advance

502k views502k

Comments

Asheesh

Dec 29, 2019

Needs advice

Hi, I am new to backend development and trying to make a decision about whether I should choose Nodejs or Spring Boot for a backend developer role. I have done 5 years of Android development and find using Java much better than javascript. Please advise why one is better over others and which one is good for the long term, also please highlight the job opportunities for both.

39.1k views39.1k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Spring	Lagom Framework
A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.	an open source framework for building reactive microservice systems in Java or Scala. Lagom builds on Akka and Play, proven technologies that are in production in some of the most demanding applications today. Its integrated development environment allows you to focus on solving business problems instead of wiring services together.
-	better defined development responsibilities—to increase agility; more frequent releases with less risk—to improve time to market
Statistics
GitHub Stars 59.1K	GitHub Stars 2.6K
GitHub Forks 38.8K	GitHub Forks 627
Stacks 3.9K	Stacks 36
Followers 4.8K	Followers 69
Votes 1.1K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 230 Java 157 Open source 136 Great community 123 Very powerful 114 Enterprise Cons 15 Draws you into its own ecosystem and bloat 4 Poor documentation 3 Verbose configuration 3 Java 2 Java is more verbose language in compare to python	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Java	Java Scala

What are some alternatives to Spring, Lagom Framework?

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Phoenix Framework

Phoenix is a framework for building HTML5 apps, API backends and distributed systems. Written in Elixir, you get beautiful syntax, productive tooling and a fast runtime.

Related Comparisons

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Lagom Framework vs Spring: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between the Lagom Framework and Spring, highlighting key differences between the two technologies.

Architecture: Lagom is built on the reactive principles and follows the CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) pattern, while Spring is a comprehensive application development framework. This difference in architecture determines the scalability, performance, and fault tolerance of the applications built on each framework.
Ease of Use: Lagom offers a more opinionated approach with consistent project structure and predefined conventions, making it easier to get started and follow best practices. Spring, on the other hand, provides more flexibility and customization options, allowing developers to choose and configure different modules as per their requirements.
Concurrency Model: Lagom incorporates the Reactive Streams API, which supports asynchronous and non-blocking communication between services. Spring, on the other hand, utilizes its own concurrency model and provides various threading models and abstractions for concurrent programming.
Service Discovery: Lagom has built-in support for service discovery using Lightbend's ConductR or Kubernetes, simplifying the management and discovery of microservices. In contrast, Spring requires the use of additional libraries or tools like Eureka or Consul to achieve similar functionality.
Testing Capabilities: Lagom provides a set of testing utilities specifically designed for testing microservices, including service mocks and integration testing support. Spring, being a comprehensive framework, offers a wide range of testing options, including unit testing, integration testing, and performance testing.
Community and Ecosystem: Spring has a large and mature community with extensive documentation, resources, and support. It has a wide ecosystem of libraries and tools that integrate well with the framework, providing developers with a rich set of options. Lagom, being a relatively newer framework, has a smaller community and ecosystem, although it is growing rapidly.

In Summary, Lagom and Spring differ in their architecture, ease of use, concurrency model, service discovery, testing capabilities, and community/ecosystem support.