Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
LGTM vs PullApprove: What are the differences?
Introduction
This markdown code presents the key differences between LGTM and PullApprove, two code review tools used in software development. LGTM (Looks Good to Me) and PullApprove are both used to streamline and improve the code review process. However, there are several specific differences that set them apart.
Integration with Version Control Systems: LGTM directly integrates with various version control systems such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. It leverages the existing pull request workflow and integrates seamlessly with these platforms. On the other hand, PullApprove requires a separate configuration file and does not provide direct integration with version control systems.
Approval and Review Rules: LGTM allows for flexible configuration of approval rules based on customizable metrics, such as the number of reviewers, code ownership, and expertise. It also provides built-in static code analysis capabilities. In contrast, PullApprove has a simpler rule-based system where reviewers are assigned based on specific conditions such as file path, label, or the presence of a reviewer list.
Pricing Model: LGTM offers a free tier for open source projects and a paid tier for enterprises. The pricing is based on the number of repositories and users. PullApprove, on the other hand, uses a different pricing model based on the number of concurrent pull requests to be reviewed.
Community and Ecosystem: LGTM has a larger community and active support from users. It also provides an open API, enabling users to extend its functionality. PullApprove, while widely used, has a smaller community compared to LGTM.
Customizability and Configuration: LGTM allows highly customizable configurations, including the ability to define approval workflows and policies specific to each project or organization. These configurations can be managed through a user-friendly interface. PullApprove, while offering some customization options, does not provide the same extent of flexibility as LGTM.
User Experience and Interface: LGTM provides a user-friendly interface with an intuitive layout that makes it easier for reviewers to perform their tasks. It highlights code changes and provides context for easy navigation. PullApprove, though functional, may not offer the same level of visual cues and user experience as LGTM.
In Summary, LGTM and PullApprove differ in terms of integration with version control systems, approval and review rules, pricing model, community support, customizability and configuration options, as well as user experience and interface.
