LGTM vs PullApprove

Overview

LGTM

Stacks11

Followers26

Votes0

GitHub Stars989

Forks125

PullApprove

Stacks2

Followers10

Votes0

LGTM vs PullApprove: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown code presents the key differences between LGTM and PullApprove, two code review tools used in software development. LGTM (Looks Good to Me) and PullApprove are both used to streamline and improve the code review process. However, there are several specific differences that set them apart.

Integration with Version Control Systems: LGTM directly integrates with various version control systems such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. It leverages the existing pull request workflow and integrates seamlessly with these platforms. On the other hand, PullApprove requires a separate configuration file and does not provide direct integration with version control systems.
Approval and Review Rules: LGTM allows for flexible configuration of approval rules based on customizable metrics, such as the number of reviewers, code ownership, and expertise. It also provides built-in static code analysis capabilities. In contrast, PullApprove has a simpler rule-based system where reviewers are assigned based on specific conditions such as file path, label, or the presence of a reviewer list.
Pricing Model: LGTM offers a free tier for open source projects and a paid tier for enterprises. The pricing is based on the number of repositories and users. PullApprove, on the other hand, uses a different pricing model based on the number of concurrent pull requests to be reviewed.
Community and Ecosystem: LGTM has a larger community and active support from users. It also provides an open API, enabling users to extend its functionality. PullApprove, while widely used, has a smaller community compared to LGTM.
Customizability and Configuration: LGTM allows highly customizable configurations, including the ability to define approval workflows and policies specific to each project or organization. These configurations can be managed through a user-friendly interface. PullApprove, while offering some customization options, does not provide the same extent of flexibility as LGTM.
User Experience and Interface: LGTM provides a user-friendly interface with an intuitive layout that makes it easier for reviewers to perform their tasks. It highlights code changes and provides context for easy navigation. PullApprove, though functional, may not offer the same level of visual cues and user experience as LGTM.

In Summary, LGTM and PullApprove differ in terms of integration with version control systems, approval and review rules, pricing model, community support, customizability and configuration options, as well as user experience and interface.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

LGTM	PullApprove
LGTM is a simple pull request approval system using GitHub protected branches and maintainers files. Pull requests are locked and cannot be merged until the minimum number of approvals are received. Project maintainers can indicate their approval by commenting on the pull request and including LGTM (looks good to me) in their approval text.	Use powerful controls to design a code review workflow that meets your internal requirements and makes it easier on your developers. Reviews are requested automatically based on the process and workflows that you design.
Unparalleled security analysis; Automated code review; Free for open source; Deep semantic code search	-
Statistics
GitHub Stars 989	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 125	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 11	Stacks 2
Followers 26	Followers 10
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
GitHub	GitHub

What are some alternatives to LGTM, PullApprove?

Remergr.io

Keep your pull requests automatically up-to-date and resolve your pull requests' conflicts directly from GitHub's UI. Save hundreds of hours you spend resolving conflicts by keeping always your pull requests automatically up-to-date to reduce the chance of conflicts. If conflicts are found, you can straightforwardly resolve them on GitHub's UI with a click of a button.

Astral

Astral pulls down all of your starred repositories on GitHub and allows you to organize them using one or more tags.

TravisBuddy

TravisBuddy is a cloud service that creates comments in failed pull requests and tell the author what went wrong and what they can do to fix it.

Insight.io for Github

Improve GitHub code browsing experience by decorating file page with x-ref. Insight.io understands the semantics of a lot of Java, Scala, C++/C, Ruby, Python, PHP repositories at github.

Octokit

It is a client library targeting .NET 4.5 and above that provides an easy way to interact with the GitHub API.

Release

When run, this command line interface automatically generates a new GitHub Release and populates it with the changes (commits) made since the last release.

GitHub Desktop

It is an open-source multi-platform GUI Git client designed for working with GitHub repositories. Focus on what matters instead of fighting with Git. Whether you're new to Git or a seasoned user, it simplifies your development workflow.

GitHub CLI

It is a free and open-source command-line for GitHub. It provides GitHub's graphical features like pull requests, issues, releases, etc. into a terminal. So, anyone can perform the whole GitHub operation from a terminal or with a script.

Datree

Prevent Kubernetes misconfigurations from reaching production with Datree’s automated policy checks for your pipeline. The open-source CLI tool empowers engineers to write more stable configurations, so they can actually sleep at night.

GitHub Polls

These polls work by pasting individual markdown SVG images into your issue, each wrapped with a link that tracks a vote. A single vote per IP is allowed for a given poll, which are stored in DynamoDB.

Related Comparisons

LGTM vs PullApprove: What are the differences?

Introduction

Integration with Version Control Systems: LGTM directly integrates with various version control systems such as GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket. It leverages the existing pull request workflow and integrates seamlessly with these platforms. On the other hand, PullApprove requires a separate configuration file and does not provide direct integration with version control systems.
Approval and Review Rules: LGTM allows for flexible configuration of approval rules based on customizable metrics, such as the number of reviewers, code ownership, and expertise. It also provides built-in static code analysis capabilities. In contrast, PullApprove has a simpler rule-based system where reviewers are assigned based on specific conditions such as file path, label, or the presence of a reviewer list.
Pricing Model: LGTM offers a free tier for open source projects and a paid tier for enterprises. The pricing is based on the number of repositories and users. PullApprove, on the other hand, uses a different pricing model based on the number of concurrent pull requests to be reviewed.
Community and Ecosystem: LGTM has a larger community and active support from users. It also provides an open API, enabling users to extend its functionality. PullApprove, while widely used, has a smaller community compared to LGTM.
Customizability and Configuration: LGTM allows highly customizable configurations, including the ability to define approval workflows and policies specific to each project or organization. These configurations can be managed through a user-friendly interface. PullApprove, while offering some customization options, does not provide the same extent of flexibility as LGTM.
User Experience and Interface: LGTM provides a user-friendly interface with an intuitive layout that makes it easier for reviewers to perform their tasks. It highlights code changes and provides context for easy navigation. PullApprove, though functional, may not offer the same level of visual cues and user experience as LGTM.

LGTM vs PullApprove

Overview