lighttpd vs Microsoft IIS vs NGINX

Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

lighttpd

148
134
+ 1
27
Microsoft IIS

15.4K
7.6K
+ 1
236
NGINX

113.3K
60.9K
+ 1
5.5K

Microsoft IIS vs lighttpd vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Microsoft IIS and lighttpd and nginx. We will highlight specific differences between these three web servers.

  1. Performance and Scalability: Microsoft IIS is known for its high performance and scalability, making it a popular choice for enterprise applications. It supports both Windows and Linux operating systems. On the other hand, lighttpd and nginx are lightweight web servers that excel in handling high concurrency and static content efficiently. They are often preferred for serving static files or as reverse proxies.

  2. Configuration and Flexibility: Microsoft IIS relies on a graphical user interface (GUI) for configuration and management, which makes it user-friendly for administrators who are accustomed to Windows environments. Lighttpd and Nginx, on the other hand, use a declarative configuration file approach, which provides more control over the server behavior and allows for fine-grained customization. This makes them suitable for advanced users or those who prefer working with configuration files directly.

  3. Modules and Extensions: Microsoft IIS has a rich set of built-in modules and extensions that provide additional functionality, such as ASP.NET support, FTP server, and integrated security features. Lighttpd and Nginx also offer various modules and extensions, but they have a more modular architecture, allowing users to choose and enable only the required modules. This modular approach keeps the server footprint small and reduces unnecessary resource consumption.

  4. Operating System Support: Microsoft IIS is primarily designed for Windows operating systems and tightly integrated with other Microsoft products. In contrast, lighttpd and nginx are cross-platform web servers that can run on both Windows and Linux operating systems. This flexibility makes them a preferred choice for developers and system administrators who require cross-platform compatibility.

  5. Caching and Proxying Capabilities: Microsoft IIS provides caching and proxying capabilities but may require additional configuration for advanced caching features. Lighttpd and Nginx have built-in support for caching and proxying, which can be easily configured and optimized. Their lightweight nature and efficient caching mechanisms make them particularly suitable for serving static content or acting as a reverse proxy.

  6. Community and Support: Microsoft IIS benefits from the strong Microsoft community and support resources, making it easier to find troubleshooting guides, tutorials, and community-driven solutions. Lighttpd and Nginx also have active communities and extensive documentation, but their user bases might be relatively smaller compared to Microsoft IIS. However, their simplicity and user-friendly configuration often compensate for the community size.

In summary, the key differences between Microsoft IIS, lighttpd, and nginx lie in their performance, configuration approach, built-in modules, operating system support, caching capabilities, and community presence.

Advice on lighttpd, Microsoft IIS, and NGINX

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!

See more
Replies (1)
Simon Aronsson
Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact · | 4 upvotes · 715.9K views
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.

See more
Needs advice
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server
and
NGINXNGINX

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

See more
Leandro Barral
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure

See more
Christian Cwienk
Software Developer at SAP · | 1 upvotes · 682.1K views
Recommends
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server

I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works

See more
Decisions about lighttpd, Microsoft IIS, and NGINX
Daniel Calvo
Co-Founder at Polpo Data Analytics & Software Development · | 8 upvotes · 268.3K views

For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.

We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.

We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.

See more
Grant Steuart
  • Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
  • The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
  • The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
  • PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of lighttpd
Pros of Microsoft IIS
Pros of NGINX
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Virtal hosting
  • 2
    Simplicity
  • 2
    Full featured
  • 2
    Proxy
  • 2
    Open source
  • 1
    Available modules
  • 1
    Fast
  • 1
    Security
  • 1
    Ssl support
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
  • 10
    Fast
  • 6
    Reliable
  • 6
    Performance
  • 4
    Powerful
  • 3
    Simple to configure
  • 3
    Webserver
  • 2
    Easy setup
  • 1
    Shipped with Windows Server
  • 1
    Ssl integration
  • 1
    Security
  • 1
    Охуенный
  • 1.4K
    High-performance http server
  • 894
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
  • 289
    Free
  • 288
    Scalability
  • 226
    Web server
  • 175
    Simplicity
  • 136
    Easy setup
  • 30
    Content caching
  • 21
    Web Accelerator
  • 15
    Capability
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    High-latency
  • 12
    Predictability
  • 8
    Reverse Proxy
  • 7
    The best of them
  • 7
    Supports http/2
  • 5
    Great Community
  • 5
    Lots of Modules
  • 5
    Enterprise version
  • 4
    High perfomance proxy server
  • 3
    Embedded Lua scripting
  • 3
    Streaming media delivery
  • 3
    Streaming media
  • 3
    Reversy Proxy
  • 2
    Blash
  • 2
    GRPC-Web
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Fast and easy to set up
  • 2
    Slim
  • 2
    saltstack
  • 1
    Virtual hosting
  • 1
    Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
  • 1
    Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
  • 1
    Ingress controller

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of lighttpd
Cons of Microsoft IIS
Cons of NGINX
    Be the first to leave a con
    • 1
      Hard to set up
    • 10
      Advanced features require subscription

    Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

    - No public GitHub repository available -
    - No public GitHub repository available -

    What is lighttpd?

    lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

    What is Microsoft IIS?

    Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

    What is NGINX?

    nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

    Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

    Jobs that mention lighttpd, Microsoft IIS, and NGINX as a desired skillset
    What companies use lighttpd?
    What companies use Microsoft IIS?
    What companies use NGINX?

    Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

    What tools integrate with lighttpd?
    What tools integrate with Microsoft IIS?
    What tools integrate with NGINX?

    Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

    Blog Posts

    What are some alternatives to lighttpd, Microsoft IIS, and NGINX?
    LiteSpeed
    It is a drop-in Apache replacement and the leading high-performance, high-scalability server. You can replace your existing Apache server with it without changing your configuration or operating system details. As a drop-in replacement, it allows you to quickly eliminate Apache bottlenecks in 15 minutes with zero downtime.
    Caddy
    Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.
    Apache HTTP Server
    The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.
    Amazon EC2
    It is a web service that provides resizable compute capacity in the cloud. It is designed to make web-scale computing easier for developers.
    Firebase
    Firebase is a cloud service designed to power real-time, collaborative applications. Simply add the Firebase library to your application to gain access to a shared data structure; any changes you make to that data are automatically synchronized with the Firebase cloud and with other clients within milliseconds.
    See all alternatives