StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Microsoft IIS vs lighttpd vs nginx

Microsoft IIS vs lighttpd vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
Stacks15.5K
Followers7.7K
Votes236
lighttpd
lighttpd
Stacks156
Followers133
Votes27

Microsoft IIS vs lighttpd vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Microsoft IIS and lighttpd and nginx. We will highlight specific differences between these three web servers.

  1. Performance and Scalability: Microsoft IIS is known for its high performance and scalability, making it a popular choice for enterprise applications. It supports both Windows and Linux operating systems. On the other hand, lighttpd and nginx are lightweight web servers that excel in handling high concurrency and static content efficiently. They are often preferred for serving static files or as reverse proxies.

  2. Configuration and Flexibility: Microsoft IIS relies on a graphical user interface (GUI) for configuration and management, which makes it user-friendly for administrators who are accustomed to Windows environments. Lighttpd and Nginx, on the other hand, use a declarative configuration file approach, which provides more control over the server behavior and allows for fine-grained customization. This makes them suitable for advanced users or those who prefer working with configuration files directly.

  3. Modules and Extensions: Microsoft IIS has a rich set of built-in modules and extensions that provide additional functionality, such as ASP.NET support, FTP server, and integrated security features. Lighttpd and Nginx also offer various modules and extensions, but they have a more modular architecture, allowing users to choose and enable only the required modules. This modular approach keeps the server footprint small and reduces unnecessary resource consumption.

  4. Operating System Support: Microsoft IIS is primarily designed for Windows operating systems and tightly integrated with other Microsoft products. In contrast, lighttpd and nginx are cross-platform web servers that can run on both Windows and Linux operating systems. This flexibility makes them a preferred choice for developers and system administrators who require cross-platform compatibility.

  5. Caching and Proxying Capabilities: Microsoft IIS provides caching and proxying capabilities but may require additional configuration for advanced caching features. Lighttpd and Nginx have built-in support for caching and proxying, which can be easily configured and optimized. Their lightweight nature and efficient caching mechanisms make them particularly suitable for serving static content or acting as a reverse proxy.

  6. Community and Support: Microsoft IIS benefits from the strong Microsoft community and support resources, making it easier to find troubleshooting guides, tutorials, and community-driven solutions. Lighttpd and Nginx also have active communities and extensive documentation, but their user bases might be relatively smaller compared to Microsoft IIS. However, their simplicity and user-friendly configuration often compensate for the community size.

In summary, the key differences between Microsoft IIS, lighttpd, and nginx lie in their performance, configuration approach, built-in modules, operating system support, caching capabilities, and community presence.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Microsoft IIS, lighttpd

Daniel
Daniel

Co-Founder at Polpo Data Analytics & Software Development

May 25, 2021

Decided

For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.

We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.

We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.

289k views289k
Comments
greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
Grant
Grant

Developer at GMS LLC

Sep 5, 2020

Decided
  • Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
  • The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
  • The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
  • PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
429k views429k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS
lighttpd
lighttpd

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
15.5K
Stacks
156
Followers
61.9K
Followers
7.7K
Followers
133
Votes
5.5K
Votes
236
Votes
27
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 83
    Great with .net
  • 55
    I'm forced to use iis
  • 27
    Use nginx
  • 18
    Azure integration
  • 15
    Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit
Cons
  • 1
    Hard to set up
Pros
  • 7
    Lightweight
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 2
    Proxy
  • 2
    Virtal hosting
  • 2
    Simplicity

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Microsoft IIS, lighttpd?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Caddy

Caddy

Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.

Cowboy

Cowboy

Cowboy aims to provide a complete HTTP stack in a small code base. It is optimized for low latency and low memory usage, in part because it uses binary strings. Cowboy provides routing capabilities, selectively dispatching requests to handlers written in Erlang.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase