Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Microsoft IIS vs lighttpd vs nginx: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this Markdown code, we will discuss the key differences between Microsoft IIS and lighttpd and nginx. We will highlight specific differences between these three web servers.
Performance and Scalability: Microsoft IIS is known for its high performance and scalability, making it a popular choice for enterprise applications. It supports both Windows and Linux operating systems. On the other hand, lighttpd and nginx are lightweight web servers that excel in handling high concurrency and static content efficiently. They are often preferred for serving static files or as reverse proxies.
Configuration and Flexibility: Microsoft IIS relies on a graphical user interface (GUI) for configuration and management, which makes it user-friendly for administrators who are accustomed to Windows environments. Lighttpd and Nginx, on the other hand, use a declarative configuration file approach, which provides more control over the server behavior and allows for fine-grained customization. This makes them suitable for advanced users or those who prefer working with configuration files directly.
Modules and Extensions: Microsoft IIS has a rich set of built-in modules and extensions that provide additional functionality, such as ASP.NET support, FTP server, and integrated security features. Lighttpd and Nginx also offer various modules and extensions, but they have a more modular architecture, allowing users to choose and enable only the required modules. This modular approach keeps the server footprint small and reduces unnecessary resource consumption.
Operating System Support: Microsoft IIS is primarily designed for Windows operating systems and tightly integrated with other Microsoft products. In contrast, lighttpd and nginx are cross-platform web servers that can run on both Windows and Linux operating systems. This flexibility makes them a preferred choice for developers and system administrators who require cross-platform compatibility.
Caching and Proxying Capabilities: Microsoft IIS provides caching and proxying capabilities but may require additional configuration for advanced caching features. Lighttpd and Nginx have built-in support for caching and proxying, which can be easily configured and optimized. Their lightweight nature and efficient caching mechanisms make them particularly suitable for serving static content or acting as a reverse proxy.
Community and Support: Microsoft IIS benefits from the strong Microsoft community and support resources, making it easier to find troubleshooting guides, tutorials, and community-driven solutions. Lighttpd and Nginx also have active communities and extensive documentation, but their user bases might be relatively smaller compared to Microsoft IIS. However, their simplicity and user-friendly configuration often compensate for the community size.
In summary, the key differences between Microsoft IIS, lighttpd, and nginx lie in their performance, configuration approach, built-in modules, operating system support, caching capabilities, and community presence.
I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!
I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.
From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."
I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.
I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure
I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works
For us, NGINX is a lite HTTP server easy to configure. On our research, we found a well-documented software we a lot of support from the community.
We have been using it alongside tools like certbot and it has been a total success.
We can easily configure our sites and have a folder for available vs enabled sites, and with the nginx -t command we can easily check everything is running fine.
- Server rendered HTML output from PHP is being migrated to the client as Vue.js components, future plans to provide additional content, and other new miscellaneous features all result in a substantial increase of static files needing to be served from the server. NGINX has better performance than Apache for serving static content.
- The change to NGINX will require switching from PHP to PHP-FPM resulting in a distributed architecture with a higher complexity configuration, but this is outweighed by PHP-FPM being faster than PHP for processing requests.
- The NGINX + PHP-FPM setup now allows for horizontally scaling of resources rather vertically scaling the previously combined Apache + PHP resources.
- PHP shell tasks can now efficiently be decoupled from the application reducing main application footprint and allow for scaling of tasks on an individual basis.
Pros of lighttpd
- Lightweight7
- Easy setup6
- Virtal hosting2
- Simplicity2
- Full featured2
- Proxy2
- Open source2
- Available modules1
- Fast1
- Security1
- Ssl support1
Pros of Microsoft IIS
- Great with .net83
- I'm forced to use iis55
- Use nginx27
- Azure integration18
- Best for ms technologyes ms bullshit15
- Fast10
- Reliable6
- Performance6
- Powerful4
- Simple to configure3
- Webserver3
- Easy setup2
- Shipped with Windows Server1
- Ssl integration1
- Security1
- Охуенный1
Pros of NGINX
- High-performance http server1.4K
- Performance894
- Easy to configure730
- Open source607
- Load balancer530
- Free289
- Scalability288
- Web server226
- Simplicity175
- Easy setup136
- Content caching30
- Web Accelerator21
- Capability15
- Fast14
- High-latency12
- Predictability12
- Reverse Proxy8
- The best of them7
- Supports http/27
- Great Community5
- Lots of Modules5
- Enterprise version5
- High perfomance proxy server4
- Embedded Lua scripting3
- Streaming media delivery3
- Streaming media3
- Reversy Proxy3
- Blash2
- GRPC-Web2
- Lightweight2
- Fast and easy to set up2
- Slim2
- saltstack2
- Virtual hosting1
- Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast1
- Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior1
- Ingress controller1
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of lighttpd
Cons of Microsoft IIS
- Hard to set up1
Cons of NGINX
- Advanced features require subscription10