Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Liquibase vs Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio: What are the differences?
- 1. Liquibase: Liquibase is an open-source database change management tool that allows developers to track, version, and manage database changes easily. It provides a platform-independent solution for database schema changes, making it suitable for multi-database environments. Liquibase supports various databases such as Oracle, SQL Server, MySQL, etc.
2. Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio: Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) is a visual tool used for managing and administering SQL Server databases. It provides a comprehensive set of features for database development, administration, and querying. SSMS is a proprietary tool specifically designed for managing SQL Server databases.
3. Deployment Control: Liquibase offers a controlled and auditable deployment process by allowing versioning, tracking, and management of the database schema changes using XML or SQL-based changelogs. In contrast, SSMS does not provide a built-in version control mechanism for database schema changes.
4. Cross-Platform Compatibility: Liquibase is developed in Java and can be used on multiple operating systems, including Windows, macOS, and Linux. It provides support for different database management systems, enabling seamless migration between platforms. On the other hand, SSMS is primarily designed for Windows and focuses exclusively on managing SQL Server databases.
5. Automation and Continuous Integration: Liquibase integrates well with tools that facilitate automation and continuous integration (CI) processes. It enables the seamless integration of database changes with software development workflows, making it ideal for DevOps practices. Conversely, SSMS lacks built-in automation and CI capabilities specific to database schema changes.
6. Community and Support: Liquibase benefits from an active open-source community with regular updates, new features, and bug fixes. It also provides extensive documentation and community support. SSMS, being a proprietary tool, is backed by Microsoft's support but relies on official documentation and Microsoft's resources for assistance and updates.
In summary, Liquibase is an open-source database change management tool that offers controlled deployment control, cross-platform compatibility, automation capabilities, and a supportive community. In contrast, Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio is a proprietary visual tool specifically designed for managing SQL Server databases without built-in version control or extensive automation features.
I am looking to build an azure database that connects to my power bi application. Initially, I attempted to create an Azure SQL database, then realized I needed to have SQL Server Management Service in order to manage and connect between Azure SQL <=> Power BI, but since I am on a Mac, I had to use the complex installation as a workaround.
If MySQL Workbench can solve this (as the product is available on Mac), I am more than happy to proceed with this approach if it can achieve the same goal of connecting an azure database with my Power BI application
What I am trying to achieve is fairly simple: have an online cloud database that connects to my Power BI application
I am open to any other solutions as well
Thank you
As others have noted, MySQL Workbench cannot be used instead of Microsoft SQL Manager to manage Azure SQL (MS-SQL Server, I hate that Microsoft uses generic category names for their products).
If you're considering switching to MySQL (Possibly using Azure MySQL managed database), then please not that unlike MS-SQL Server, you do not need the MySQL Workbench to connect your application to MysQL: just use the correct driver for your stack, and you're all set (if your stack is using the .Net platform, use MySQL Connector/NET from: https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/net/ ).
If you do want to use a graphical interface to maintain your MySQL database, then MySQL Workbench is a great choice, but you are not limited to it - as others have mentioned, there is a plethora of competing graphical database management tools that would work just as well with MySQL - one of the advantages of choosing MySQL for your stack is the huge eco-system that is built around it.
Hello Could you give us a better idea of what Data Base Management System (DBMS) you are using at Azure? MySQL Workbench and Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) are tools developed to exclusively manage MySQL and SQL Server, respectively. If you need to manage multiple DBMS's from a single tool, I sugget you try DBeaver. There are also another alternatives: HeidiSQL, phpMyAdmin, etc. Regarding the DBMS itself, I suggest you stick with SQL Server. In my opinion it's more stable and has more features than MySQL - especially in the Standard and Enterprise editions. Regards, Lawrence
Microsoft provides an application known as Azure Data Studio that runs on Windows, Mac and Linux machines. It provides the ability to manage an Azure SQL database, as well as connecting to standard SQL Server databases. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/azure-data-studio/what-is?view=sql-server-ver15
As far as I know, MySQL Workbench doesn't handle Microsoft connections, including Azure, you should try Microsoft solutions such as MS VS Code.
Hi Aashwiin, Looking at your stack (https://stackshare.io/aashwiin82347/my-stack), it seems you are using Azure SQL Databases. I'll infer this is Microsoft SQL Server. Therefore, it certainly makes sense you stick with some of the official Microsoft Tooling to connect to it, query and administer it. You'd only be looking at MySQL Query Workbench, if you were running and connecting to a MySQL Database. - That said, could Azure MySQL (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/mysql/overview) be an option for you a this point? MySQL offers great performance. I have been running it at various companies (under AWS/RDS and AWS/Aurora) and have no reason to switch over to anything else. - Decision making-wise, how much do your want your local sql/mysql client to influence/weigh in your architecture/technology decisions, though? This can be a slippery slope. - Alternatively, other clients exist, such as "Table Plus" and allow you to connect, on Mac, to a variety of database servers, including SQL Server. It might be worth giving it a try.
Pros of Liquibase
- Great database tool18
- Many DBs supported18
- Easy setup12
- Database independent migration scripts8
- Unique open source tool5
- Database version controller5
- Precondition checking2
- Supports NoSQL and Graph DBs2
Pros of Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of Liquibase
- Documentation is disorganized5
- No vendor specifics in XML format - needs workarounds5