Liquibase vs ProxySQL

Overview

Liquibase

Stacks638

Followers648

Votes70

GitHub Stars5.3K

Forks1.9K

ProxySQL

Stacks43

Followers85

Votes0

Liquibase vs ProxySQL: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Liquibase and ProxySQL

Functionality: Liquibase is a database schema change management tool that allows developers to track, version, and deploy database changes. It focuses on managing database changes in a structured and reproducible way. On the other hand, ProxySQL is a high-performance SQL proxy that sits between the application and database servers, providing functionalities such as load balancing, query routing, caching, and monitoring.
Primary Use Case: Liquibase is primarily used for managing database schema changes and version control, ensuring that database changes are executed in a consistent and organized manner. In contrast, ProxySQL is used for optimizing and scaling database operations, such as distributing queries across multiple database servers, improving performance, and enhancing security.
Implementation: Liquibase is typically integrated into the development process to automate and manage database changes alongside application code. It uses XML, YAML, or SQL formats to describe database changes in a declarative way. On the other hand, ProxySQL is implemented as a separate infrastructure component that acts as a reverse proxy for database connections, intercepting and optimizing SQL queries before forwarding them to the database servers.
Granularity of Control: Liquibase provides developers with detailed control over individual database changes, allowing them to specify migrations, rollbacks, and conditional logic for executing changes. In contrast, ProxySQL focuses more on holistic optimization at the query level, offering features like query caching, query routing, and connection pooling to improve database performance and reliability.
Supported Databases: Liquibase supports a wide range of database management systems, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server, and more, making it a versatile tool for managing database changes across different platforms. ProxySQL, on the other hand, is specifically designed for MySQL-based databases, providing advanced features tailored to optimize MySQL query execution and scalability.
User Base: Liquibase is commonly used by developers, database administrators, and DevOps professionals to streamline database development and deployment processes. In comparison, ProxySQL is more often utilized by system administrators, database architects, and infrastructure teams to enhance database performance, scalability, and reliability in production environments.

In Summary, Liquibase focuses on database schema change management and version control, while ProxySQL specializes in optimizing database performance through SQL query routing and load balancing.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

Liquibase	ProxySQL
Liquibase is th leading open-source tool for database schema change management. Liquibase helps teams track, version, and deploy database schema and logic changes so they can automate their database code process with their app code process.	It has an advanced multi-core architecture. It's built from the ground up to support hundreds of thousands of concurrent connections, multiplexed to potentially hundreds of backend servers. It helps you squeeze the last drop of performance out of your MySQL cluster, without controlling the applications that generate the queries.
Supports code branching and merging;Supports multiple developers;Supports multiple database types;Supports XML, YAML, JSON and SQL formats;Supports context-dependent logic;Cluster-safe database upgrades;Generate Database change documentation;Rollbacks;Generate Database "diff's";Run through your build process, embedded in your application or on demand;Automatically generate SQL scripts for DBA code review;Does not require a live database connection;Stored logic	Query caching; Query Routing; Supports failover
Statistics
GitHub Stars 5.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 1.9K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 638	Stacks 43
Followers 648	Followers 85
Votes 70	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 18 Many DBs supported 18 Great database tool 12 Easy setup 8 Database independent migration scripts 5 Database version controller Cons 5 Documentation is disorganized 5 No vendor specifics in XML format - needs workarounds	No community feedback yet
Integrations
Amazon RDS for MariaDB Travis CI SAP HANA Oracle PostgreSQL Sybase jFrog GitHub Actions Firebird IBM DB2	MySQL MariaDB Percona

What are some alternatives to Liquibase, ProxySQL?

dbForge Studio for MySQL

It is the universal MySQL and MariaDB client for database management, administration and development. With the help of this intelligent MySQL client the work with data and code has become easier and more convenient. This tool provides utilities to compare, synchronize, and backup MySQL databases with scheduling, and gives possibility to analyze and report MySQL tables data.

dbForge Studio for Oracle

It is a powerful integrated development environment (IDE) which helps Oracle SQL developers to increase PL/SQL coding speed, provides versatile data editing tools for managing in-database and external data.

dbForge Studio for PostgreSQL

It is a GUI tool for database development and management. The IDE for PostgreSQL allows users to create, develop, and execute queries, edit and adjust the code to their requirements in a convenient and user-friendly interface.

dbForge Studio for SQL Server

It is a powerful IDE for SQL Server management, administration, development, data reporting and analysis. The tool will help SQL developers to manage databases, version-control database changes in popular source control systems, speed up routine tasks, as well, as to make complex database changes.

Sequel Pro

Sequel Pro is a fast, easy-to-use Mac database management application for working with MySQL databases.

DBeaver

It is a free multi-platform database tool for developers, SQL programmers, database administrators and analysts. Supports all popular databases: MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, Oracle, DB2, SQL Server, Sybase, Teradata, MongoDB, Cassandra, Redis, etc.

dbForge SQL Complete

It is an IntelliSense add-in for SQL Server Management Studio, designed to provide the fastest T-SQL query typing ever possible.

Knex.js

Knex.js is a "batteries included" SQL query builder for Postgres, MySQL, MariaDB, SQLite3, and Oracle designed to be flexible, portable, and fun to use. It features both traditional node style callbacks as well as a promise interface for cleaner async flow control, a stream interface, full featured query and schema builders, transaction support (with savepoints), connection pooling and standardized responses between different query clients and dialects.

Flyway

It lets you regain control of your database migrations with pleasure and plain sql. Solves only one problem and solves it well. It migrates your database, so you don't have to worry about it anymore.

PostGIS

PostGIS is a spatial database extender for PostgreSQL object-relational database. It adds support for geographic objects allowing location queries to be run in SQL.

Related Comparisons

Liquibase vs ProxySQL: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Liquibase and ProxySQL

Functionality: Liquibase is a database schema change management tool that allows developers to track, version, and deploy database changes. It focuses on managing database changes in a structured and reproducible way. On the other hand, ProxySQL is a high-performance SQL proxy that sits between the application and database servers, providing functionalities such as load balancing, query routing, caching, and monitoring.
Primary Use Case: Liquibase is primarily used for managing database schema changes and version control, ensuring that database changes are executed in a consistent and organized manner. In contrast, ProxySQL is used for optimizing and scaling database operations, such as distributing queries across multiple database servers, improving performance, and enhancing security.
Implementation: Liquibase is typically integrated into the development process to automate and manage database changes alongside application code. It uses XML, YAML, or SQL formats to describe database changes in a declarative way. On the other hand, ProxySQL is implemented as a separate infrastructure component that acts as a reverse proxy for database connections, intercepting and optimizing SQL queries before forwarding them to the database servers.
Granularity of Control: Liquibase provides developers with detailed control over individual database changes, allowing them to specify migrations, rollbacks, and conditional logic for executing changes. In contrast, ProxySQL focuses more on holistic optimization at the query level, offering features like query caching, query routing, and connection pooling to improve database performance and reliability.
Supported Databases: Liquibase supports a wide range of database management systems, including MySQL, PostgreSQL, Oracle, SQL Server, and more, making it a versatile tool for managing database changes across different platforms. ProxySQL, on the other hand, is specifically designed for MySQL-based databases, providing advanced features tailored to optimize MySQL query execution and scalability.
User Base: Liquibase is commonly used by developers, database administrators, and DevOps professionals to streamline database development and deployment processes. In comparison, ProxySQL is more often utilized by system administrators, database architects, and infrastructure teams to enhance database performance, scalability, and reliability in production environments.

In Summary, Liquibase focuses on database schema change management and version control, while ProxySQL specializes in optimizing database performance through SQL query routing and load balancing.

Liquibase vs ProxySQL

Overview