StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Business Tools
  3. UI Components
  4. Javascript UI Libraries
  5. Lit vs React

Lit vs React

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

React
React
Stacks182.6K
Followers147.0K
Votes4.1K
GitHub Stars240.3K
Forks49.7K
Lit
Lit
Stacks126
Followers36
Votes4
GitHub Stars2.0K
Forks94

Lit vs React: What are the differences?

Key Differences between Lit and React

Lit and React are both popular frameworks for building user interfaces in web development. While they share certain similarities, there are key differences that set them apart. Here are six distinct differences:

  1. Render Method: In React, components define a render method that returns the UI structure as a tree of components. On the other hand, Lit uses a "template-first" approach, where components are defined using HTML templates directly. This allows for better separation of concerns and makes it easier to create reusable UI elements.

  2. Component Creation: React uses JavaScript to create components, relying heavily on JSX syntax to define the component structure. In contrast, Lit uses a lightweight class-based syntax that is similar to writing HTML directly, making it more intuitive and accessible for beginners.

  3. Reactivity Model: React uses a virtual DOM (VDOM) to efficiently update the UI when the underlying data changes. It tracks state changes and updates only the affected components. Lit, on the other hand, leverages a modern JavaScript feature called "template literals" to create reactive templates. This allows it to update only the parts of the template that change, resulting in more efficient rendering.

  4. Size and Performance: Lit has a smaller footprint compared to React, which means faster page load times and improved performance. It achieves this by relying on native browser features and optimizations, without the need for a separate runtime. React, on the other hand, provides additional features and a wider ecosystem, but this comes at the cost of larger bundle sizes and potentially slower initial loading times.

  5. Developer Experience: React has a mature and extensive ecosystem, with a large community, rich documentation, and numerous third-party libraries and tools available. This makes it easier for developers to find resources and solutions to common problems. While Lit is still a relatively new framework, it offers a simpler and more focused developer experience, with clear patterns and conventions that are easy to follow.

  6. Compatibility: React has broad support across different platforms and frameworks, including React Native for mobile app development. It also integrates well with existing JavaScript libraries and frameworks. On the other hand, Lit is more focused on the web platform, specifically modern web standards like custom elements and Shadow DOM. It aims to provide a lightweight and performant solution for web-centric applications.

In summary, Lit and React differ in their approach to component creation, reactivity, performance, developer experience, and compatibility. While React offers a mature ecosystem and broader platform support, Lit provides a simpler and more focused solution for web development, with a smaller footprint and improved performance.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on React, Lit

Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs adviceonVue.jsVue.jsReactReact

I find using Vue.js to be easier (more concise / less boilerplate) and more intuitive than writing React. However, there are a lot more readily available React components that I can just plug into my projects. I'm debating whether to use Vue.js or React for an upcoming project that I'm going to use to help teach a friend how to build an interactive frontend. Which would you recommend I use?

884k views884k
Comments
Cyrus
Cyrus

Aug 15, 2019

Needs advice

Simple datepickers are cumbersome. For such a simple data input, I feel like it takes far too much effort. Ideally, the native input[type="date"] would just work like it does on FF and Chrome, but Safari and Edge don't handle it properly. So I'm left either having a diverging experience based on the browser or I need to choose a library to implement a datepicker since users aren't good at inputing formatted strings.

For React alone there are tons of examples to use https://reactjsexample.com/tag/date/. And then of course there's the bootstrap datepicker (https://bootstrap-datepicker.readthedocs.io/en/latest/), jQueryUI calendar picker, https://github.com/flatpickr/flatpickr, and many more.

How do you recommend going about handling date and time inputs? And then there's always moment.js, but I've observed some users getting stuck when presented with a blank text field. I'm curious to hear what's worked well for people...

401k views401k
Comments
Malek
Malek

Web developer at Quicktext

Mar 28, 2020

Decided

The project is a web gadget previously made using vanilla script and JQuery, It is a part of the "Quicktext" platform and offers an in-app live & customizable messaging widget. We made that remake with React eco-system and Typescript and we're so far happy with results. We gained tons of TS features, React scaling & re-usabilities capabilities and much more!

What do you think?

244k views244k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

React
React
Lit
Lit

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

A tiny CSS framework that preserves everything Skeleton, Milligram, and other micro frameworks have to offer.

Declarative; Component-based; Learn once, write anywhere
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
240.3K
GitHub Stars
2.0K
GitHub Forks
49.7K
GitHub Forks
94
Stacks
182.6K
Stacks
126
Followers
147.0K
Followers
36
Votes
4.1K
Votes
4
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 837
    Components
  • 674
    Virtual dom
  • 579
    Performance
  • 509
    Simplicity
  • 442
    Composable
Cons
  • 41
    Requires discipline to keep architecture organized
  • 30
    No predefined way to structure your app
  • 29
    Need to be familiar with lots of third party packages
  • 13
    JSX
  • 10
    Not enterprise friendly
Pros
  • 2
    Lit-html
  • 2
    Performance

What are some alternatives to React, Lit?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Materialize

Materialize

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase