React Redux vs lodash

Overview

Lodash

Stacks10.7K

Followers886

Votes3

GitHub Stars61.3K

Forks7.1K

React Redux

Stacks1.0K

Followers890

Votes0

React Redux vs lodash: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown provides a comparison between React Redux and lodash, highlighting the key differences between the two libraries.

Mounting: React Redux is a library specifically designed for managing state in a React application. It provides a set of components and functions to connect React components with a Redux store. On the other hand, lodash is a utility library that offers a wide range of generic functions for working with arrays, objects, and other data types. It does not directly deal with React components or state management.
State Management: React Redux focuses on state management in a React application. It provides a single source of truth by establishing a centralized Redux store, which holds the state of the application. Developers can dispatch actions to modify the state, and React Redux takes care of updating the connected components when the state changes. In contrast, lodash does not provide any state management capabilities. It mainly focuses on providing utility functions to work with data and perform various operations without affecting the application state directly.
Functional Programming: Lodash heavily emphasizes functional programming and provides numerous higher-order functions to manipulate data. It offers functions such as map, reduce, filter, and sort that enable developers to perform complex operations on arrays and objects. React Redux, on the other hand, is more focused on managing the state and rendering React components efficiently. While functional programming concepts can be applied within React Redux development, it is not the primary focus of the library.
UI Component State: React Redux primarily deals with the application-level state managed through the Redux store. It is not responsible for managing the state of individual UI components. React components can have their own local state, also known as component-level state, which can be managed using React's built-in useState or useReducer hooks. In contrast, lodash does not provide any specific features for managing component-level state or rendering UI components.
Dependency Size: React Redux is a library that represents the bridge between React and Redux, providing the necessary components and functions for connecting React components with the Redux store. Although it adds some additional code to the application, its size is relatively small compared to the overall size of a typical React application. On the other hand, lodash is a comprehensive utility library with a broader scope, including functions for collections, functions, and objects. Hence, lodash tends to have a larger size compared to React Redux.
Community Ecosystem: React Redux is tightly integrated with the React ecosystem and is widely used within the React community. It has a well-established ecosystem with additional libraries and tools specifically designed for React and Redux development, such as react-router-redux, reselect, and redux-thunk. Lodash, on the other hand, is a more general-purpose utility library used across various JavaScript projects, not limited to React or Redux. It has a large and active community with extensive documentation and support.

In Summary, React Redux is a library focused on state management and rendering React components efficiently, while lodash provides a wide range of generic utility functions for working with data.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on Lodash, React Redux

Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash	React Redux
A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.	It is the official React binding for Redux. It lets your React components read data from a Redux store, and dispatch actions to the store to update data. It is designed to work with React's component model. You define how to extract the values your component needs from Redux, and your component receives them as props.
-	Designed to work with React's component model; manage the store interaction logic for you; complex performance optimizations
Statistics
GitHub Stars 61.3K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 7.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 10.7K	Stacks 1.0K
Followers 886	Followers 890
Votes 3	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 2 Better than Underscore 1 Simple 0 Better that Underscore Cons 1 It reduce the performance	No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript	Redux React

What are some alternatives to Lodash, React Redux?

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

React Redux vs lodash: What are the differences?

Introduction

This markdown provides a comparison between React Redux and lodash, highlighting the key differences between the two libraries.

Mounting: React Redux is a library specifically designed for managing state in a React application. It provides a set of components and functions to connect React components with a Redux store. On the other hand, lodash is a utility library that offers a wide range of generic functions for working with arrays, objects, and other data types. It does not directly deal with React components or state management.
State Management: React Redux focuses on state management in a React application. It provides a single source of truth by establishing a centralized Redux store, which holds the state of the application. Developers can dispatch actions to modify the state, and React Redux takes care of updating the connected components when the state changes. In contrast, lodash does not provide any state management capabilities. It mainly focuses on providing utility functions to work with data and perform various operations without affecting the application state directly.
Functional Programming: Lodash heavily emphasizes functional programming and provides numerous higher-order functions to manipulate data. It offers functions such as map, reduce, filter, and sort that enable developers to perform complex operations on arrays and objects. React Redux, on the other hand, is more focused on managing the state and rendering React components efficiently. While functional programming concepts can be applied within React Redux development, it is not the primary focus of the library.
UI Component State: React Redux primarily deals with the application-level state managed through the Redux store. It is not responsible for managing the state of individual UI components. React components can have their own local state, also known as component-level state, which can be managed using React's built-in useState or useReducer hooks. In contrast, lodash does not provide any specific features for managing component-level state or rendering UI components.
Dependency Size: React Redux is a library that represents the bridge between React and Redux, providing the necessary components and functions for connecting React components with the Redux store. Although it adds some additional code to the application, its size is relatively small compared to the overall size of a typical React application. On the other hand, lodash is a comprehensive utility library with a broader scope, including functions for collections, functions, and objects. Hence, lodash tends to have a larger size compared to React Redux.
Community Ecosystem: React Redux is tightly integrated with the React ecosystem and is widely used within the React community. It has a well-established ecosystem with additional libraries and tools specifically designed for React and Redux development, such as react-router-redux, reselect, and redux-thunk. Lodash, on the other hand, is a more general-purpose utility library used across various JavaScript projects, not limited to React or Redux. It has a large and active community with extensive documentation and support.

In Summary, React Redux is a library focused on state management and rendering React components efficiently, while lodash provides a wide range of generic utility functions for working with data.