StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. Lodash vs Recompose

Lodash vs Recompose

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Lodash
Lodash
Stacks10.7K
Followers886
Votes3
GitHub Stars61.3K
Forks7.1K
Recompose
Recompose
Stacks73
Followers19
Votes0
GitHub Stars15.0K
Forks1.2K

Lodash vs Recompose: What are the differences?

1. **Performance**: Lodash focuses on providing a wide range of utility functions for data manipulation, whereas Recompose is specifically designed for optimizing React components. Lodash offers optimized functions for common tasks like iteration, manipulation, and querying, making it an efficient choice for general-purpose use. On the other hand, Recompose provides a set of higher-order component utilities aimed at enhancing the performance of React components by reducing unnecessary re-renders and improving component composition.
  1. Functional Programming: Lodash emphasizes functional programming paradigms by providing functions that heavily utilize concepts like immutability and currying. This makes it a powerful tool for manipulating data in a functional manner. In contrast, Recompose focuses on enhancing the functional aspect of React components by offering utilities for composing higher-order components, handling state management, and improving component lifecycle methods. It enables developers to apply functional programming principles specifically within React components.

  2. Dependencies: Lodash has a larger footprint due to its extensive collection of utility functions, which can increase the overall bundle size of an application. Recompose, on the other hand, is a lightweight library that aims to minimize dependencies and provide focused functionalities for enhancing React components. By using Recompose, developers can keep the application size smaller and optimize the performance of React components without introducing unnecessary bloat.

  3. Community Support: Lodash has been a widely adopted library with a large community of users and contributors, ensuring ongoing updates, bug fixes, and support. Recompose, although actively maintained, has a smaller community compared to Lodash due to its specialized focus on React component optimization. However, both libraries have dedicated user bases that provide valuable insights, documentation, and community-driven enhancements to the libraries.

  4. Versatility: Lodash offers a broad range of utility functions that can be used in various JavaScript environments, making it versatile for different types of projects. Recompose, being more specific to React components, excels in optimizing component performance within the React ecosystem. While Lodash can be utilized in a wide array of projects beyond React applications, Recompose is specifically tailored to address the needs of React developers seeking to enhance component functionality and efficiency.

In Summary, Lodash is a versatile library for general data manipulation tasks with a broader scope, while Recompose focuses on optimizing React components through functional programming utilities and component enhancements.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Lodash, Recompose

Abigail
Abigail

Dec 6, 2019

Decided

Fast Healthcare Interoperability Resources (FHIR) provides standard data objects in JSON format for the healthcare industry. Since JSON objects are hierarchical and tree-like, we had a need to defensively 'pluck' fields from our JSON objects and do lots of mapping. We tried jQuery and Underscore and a few other technologies like FHIRPath; but Lodash has been the most well supported, works in the most contexts, has the cleanest syntax, etc. We particularly like the ES6 version of Lodash, where we can import the method names directly, without resorting to * or _ syntax. We got hooked on the 'get' function to defensively pluck fields from objects without crashing our user interface, and have found countless uses for the other lodash functions throughout our apps. Lodash is great for developing and optimizing algorithms.

38.3k views38.3k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Lodash
Lodash
Recompose
Recompose

A JavaScript utility library delivering consistency, modularity, performance, & extras. It provides utility functions for common programming tasks using the functional programming paradigm.

It is a React utility belt for function components and higher-order components. A higher-order component (HOC) refers to a function that accepts a single React component and returns a new React component. Think of it like lodash for React.

-
Higher-order components made easy; Optimizing bundle size
Statistics
GitHub Stars
61.3K
GitHub Stars
15.0K
GitHub Forks
7.1K
GitHub Forks
1.2K
Stacks
10.7K
Stacks
73
Followers
886
Followers
19
Votes
3
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 2
    Better than Underscore
  • 1
    Simple
  • 0
    Better that Underscore
Cons
  • 1
    It reduce the performance
No community feedback yet
Integrations
JavaScript
JavaScript
React
React
rollup
rollup

What are some alternatives to Lodash, Recompose?

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Chart.js

Chart.js

Visualize your data in 6 different ways. Each of them animated, with a load of customisation options and interactivity extensions.

Immutable.js

Immutable.js

Immutable provides Persistent Immutable List, Stack, Map, OrderedMap, Set, OrderedSet and Record. They are highly efficient on modern JavaScript VMs by using structural sharing via hash maps tries and vector tries as popularized by Clojure and Scala, minimizing the need to copy or cache data.

Ramda

Ramda

It emphasizes a purer functional style. Immutability and side-effect free functions are at the heart of its design philosophy. This can help you get the job done with simple, elegant code.

Vue CLI

Vue CLI

Vue CLI aims to be the standard tooling baseline for the Vue ecosystem. It ensures the various build tools work smoothly together with sensible defaults so you can focus on writing your app instead of spending days wrangling with config.

Luxon

Luxon

It is a library that makes it easier to work with dates and times in Javascript. If you want, add and subtract them, format and parse them, ask them hard questions, and so on, it provides a much easier and comprehensive interface than the native types it wraps.

Prepack

Prepack

Prepack is a partial evaluator for JavaScript. Prepack rewrites a JavaScript bundle, resulting in JavaScript code that executes more efficiently. For initialization-heavy code, Prepack works best in an environment where JavaScript parsing is effectively cached.

Blockly

Blockly

It is a client-side library for the programming language JavaScript for creating block-based visual programming languages and editors. It is a project of Google and is free and open-source software.

Cesium

Cesium

it is used to create the leading web-based globe and map for visualizing dynamic data. We strive for the best possible performance, precision, visual quality, ease of use, platform support, and content.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase