StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Material Design for Angular vs Revel

Material Design for Angular vs Revel

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Revel
Revel
Stacks36
Followers100
Votes38
GitHub Stars13.2K
Forks1.4K
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular
Stacks11.8K
Followers9.6K
Votes522
GitHub Stars16.5K
Forks3.4K

Material Design for Angular vs Revel: What are the differences?

Material Design for Angular: Material Design for AngularJS Apps. Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs; Revel: A high productivity, full-stack web framework for the Go language. Revel makes it easy to build web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern by relying on conventions that require a certain structure in your application. In return, it is very light on configuration and enables an extremely fast development cycle.

Material Design for Angular and Revel are primarily classified as "Front-End Frameworks" and "Frameworks (Full Stack)" tools respectively.

"Ui components" is the primary reason why developers consider Material Design for Angular over the competitors, whereas "Go" was stated as the key factor in picking Revel.

Material Design for Angular and Revel are both open source tools. It seems that Material Design for Angular with 16.5K GitHub stars and 3.57K forks on GitHub has more adoption than Revel with 11.2K GitHub stars and 1.33K GitHub forks.

Accenture, Movielala, and Vungle are some of the popular companies that use Material Design for Angular, whereas Revel is used by RetargetApp, Alibre, and Jackpot Rising. Material Design for Angular has a broader approval, being mentioned in 286 company stacks & 383 developers stacks; compared to Revel, which is listed in 3 company stacks and 4 developer stacks.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Revel
Revel
Material Design for Angular
Material Design for Angular

Revel makes it easy to build web applications using the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern by relying on conventions that require a certain structure in your application. In return, it is very light on configuration and enables an extremely fast development cycle.

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
13.2K
GitHub Stars
16.5K
GitHub Forks
1.4K
GitHub Forks
3.4K
Stacks
36
Stacks
11.8K
Followers
100
Followers
9.6K
Votes
38
Votes
522
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 16
    Go
  • 6
    High-Productivity
  • 5
    Full-Stack
  • 4
    High performance
  • 4
    MVC
Pros
  • 122
    Ui components
  • 63
    Backed by google
  • 51
    Backed by angular
  • 51
    Free
  • 47
    Javascript
Cons
  • 4
    No practical examples
Integrations
Golang
Golang
AngularJS
AngularJS

What are some alternatives to Revel, Material Design for Angular?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase