StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Cross Platform Mobile Development
  5. Materialize vs PhoneGap

Materialize vs PhoneGap

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

PhoneGap
PhoneGap
Stacks578
Followers685
Votes94
GitHub Stars4.0K
Forks889
Materialize
Materialize
Stacks698
Followers1.2K
Votes557
GitHub Stars39.1K
Forks4.7K

Materialize vs PhoneGap: What are the differences?

## Introduction
This markdown code provides key differences between Materialize and PhoneGap for website development.

1. **User Interface Components**: Materialize offers a wide range of pre-built UI components and design elements for creating visually appealing websites, whereas PhoneGap primarily focuses on providing tools for building mobile applications that can run on various platforms.
2. **Focus on Design**: Materialize places a significant emphasis on design aesthetics, offering sleek and modern designs out of the box, while PhoneGap's primary focus is on cross-platform compatibility and functionality rather than design.
3. **Documentation and Support**: Materialize provides comprehensive documentation with code examples and guidelines to help users easily implement its features, whereas PhoneGap offers extensive documentation and community support specifically for mobile app development.
4. **Community and Ecosystem**: Materialize has a diverse community contributing themes, extensions, and plugins to enhance its capabilities, while PhoneGap has a large community of developers actively creating plugins and tools to extend its functionality for mobile app development.
5. **Integration with Other Frameworks**: Materialize can be easily integrated with other front-end frameworks like Angular and React for enhanced functionality and flexibility, whereas PhoneGap is often used in conjunction with frameworks like Ionic for building robust and feature-rich mobile applications.
6. **Development Approach**: Materialize focuses on responsive web design and front-end development for websites, while PhoneGap enables developers to build mobile apps using web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript that can be deployed across different mobile platforms.

In Summary, Materialize is more suited for web development with a focus on design and UI components, while PhoneGap is tailored for cross-platform mobile app development with an emphasis on functionality and compatibility.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on PhoneGap, Materialize

Ru_Co
Ru_Co

Sep 9, 2020

Review

Hi Manish,

Well between those 2 options (Kotlin and Flutter), Flutter would be the only one that would allow you to make your app for both Apple and Android. Kotlin is for Android only. But there are other crossplatform development frameworks besides Flutter. Which one is the best for you would depend on the app you want to create and your current expertises and preferences. I've marked a few alternatives in my answer.

127 views127
Comments
Aleksandr
Aleksandr

Contract Software Engineer - Microsoft at Microsoft-365

Dec 23, 2019

Review

What is Proguard?

ProGuard is the most popular optimizer for Java bytecode. It makes your Java and Android applications up to 90% smaller and up to 20% faster. ProGuard also provides minimal protection against reverse engineering by obfuscating the names of classes, fields and methods.

How to use it in Cordova app?

I didn't find any plugins for it. So I've implemented it by myself and shared it on GitHub.

Feel free to use!

119k views119k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

PhoneGap
PhoneGap
Materialize
Materialize

PhoneGap is a web platform that exposes native mobile device apis and data to JavaScript. PhoneGap is a distribution of Apache Cordova. PhoneGap allows you to use standard web technologies such as HTML5, CSS3, and JavaScript for cross-platform development, avoiding each mobile platforms' native development language. Applications execute within wrappers targeted to each platform, and rely on standards-compliant API bindings to access each device's sensors, data, and network status.

A CSS Framework based on material design.

Android;Blackberry;iOS;Windows Phone;Windows8
Speeds up development;User Experience Focused;Easy to work with
Statistics
GitHub Stars
4.0K
GitHub Stars
39.1K
GitHub Forks
889
GitHub Forks
4.7K
Stacks
578
Stacks
698
Followers
685
Followers
1.2K
Votes
94
Votes
557
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 46
    Javascript
  • 13
    Backed by Adobe
  • 11
    Free
  • 9
    Easy and developer friendly
  • 6
    Support more platforms
Cons
  • 2
    Never as good as a native app
  • 1
    Not build for high performance
  • 1
    Poor user experience
  • 1
    Created for web pages, not for complex Apps
  • 1
    Hard to see
Pros
  • 102
    Google material design
  • 74
    Responsive
  • 74
    Easy to use
  • 54
    Modern looks
  • 48
    Open source
Cons
  • 7
    Mobile errors
  • 6
    Poor Grid System
  • 2
    Unmaintained

What are some alternatives to PhoneGap, Materialize?

Bootstrap

Bootstrap

Bootstrap is the most popular HTML, CSS, and JS framework for developing responsive, mobile first projects on the web.

Ionic

Ionic

Free and open source, Ionic offers a library of mobile and desktop-optimized HTML, CSS and JS components for building highly interactive apps. Use with Angular, React, Vue, or plain JavaScript.

Flutter

Flutter

Flutter is a mobile app SDK to help developers and designers build modern mobile apps for iOS and Android.

React Native

React Native

React Native enables you to build world-class application experiences on native platforms using a consistent developer experience based on JavaScript and React. The focus of React Native is on developer efficiency across all the platforms you care about - learn once, write anywhere. Facebook uses React Native in multiple production apps and will continue investing in React Native.

Xamarin

Xamarin

Xamarin’s Mono-based products enable .NET developers to use their existing code, libraries and tools (including Visual Studio*), as well as skills in .NET and the C# programming language, to create mobile applications for the industry’s most widely-used mobile devices, including Android-based smartphones and tablets, iPhone, iPad and iPod Touch.

Foundation

Foundation

Foundation is the most advanced responsive front-end framework in the world. You can quickly prototype and build sites or apps that work on any kind of device with Foundation, which includes layout constructs (like a fully responsive grid), elements and best practices.

Semantic UI

Semantic UI

Semantic empowers designers and developers by creating a shared vocabulary for UI.

Material Design for Angular

Material Design for Angular

Material Design is a specification for a unified system of visual, motion, and interaction design that adapts across different devices. Our goal is to deliver a lean, lightweight set of AngularJS-native UI elements that implement the material design system for use in Angular SPAs.

NativeScript

NativeScript

NativeScript enables developers to build native apps for iOS, Android and Windows Universal while sharing the application code across the platforms. When building the application UI, developers use our libraries, which abstract the differences between the native platforms.

Material-UI

Material-UI

Material UI is a library of React UI components that implements Google's Material Design.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase