Metalsmith vs Middleman: What are the differences?
Developers describe Metalsmith as "An extremely simple, pluggable static site generator". In Metalsmith, all of the logic is handled by plugins. You simply chain them together. Since everything is a plugin, the core library is actually just an abstraction for manipulating a directory of files. On the other hand, Middleman is detailed as "A static site generator using all the shortcuts and tools in modern web development". Middleman is a command-line tool for creating static websites using all the shortcuts and tools of the modern web development environment.
Metalsmith and Middleman can be categorized as "Static Site Generators" tools.
Some of the features offered by Metalsmith are:
- Read template files from a directory
- Parse files for template placeholders
- Prompt user to fill in each placeholder
On the other hand, Middleman provides the following key features:
- Sass for DRY stylesheets
- Multiple asset management solutions, including Sprockets
"Plugability" is the primary reason why developers consider Metalsmith over the competitors, whereas "Rails for static sites" was stated as the key factor in picking Middleman.
Metalsmith and Middleman are both open source tools. It seems that Metalsmith with 7.27K GitHub stars and 640 forks on GitHub has more adoption than Middleman with 6.49K GitHub stars and 696 GitHub forks.
What is Metalsmith?
What is Middleman?
Want advice about which of these to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
Sign up to add, upvote and see more prosMake informed product decisions
What are the cons of using Metalsmith?
What are the cons of using Middleman?
Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions
Liked the approach the best of all SSR's out there, integrated it with Gulp for one single build pipeline
[FREE] We use middleman for its ease and speed to develop and deploy micro/marketing sites.
Flexible static site generator, doesn't need to be more complex than this.