Micronaut Framework vs OSGi: What are the differences?

# Introduction
This Markdown code compares the key differences between Micronaut Framework and OSGi.

1. **Architecture**: Micronaut is a modern framework designed for building modular, easily testable microservice and serverless applications, whereas OSGi is a dynamic module system for Java that allows components to be installed, started, stopped, updated, and uninstalled in a running system.
2. **Programming Model**: Micronaut uses Ahead of Time (AoT) compilation to pre-compute metadata for runtime use and remove the need for reflection, while OSGi uses a dynamic service model and provides a more dynamic runtime environment for modular applications.
3. **Configuration Management**: Micronaut leverages compile-time configuration loading for performance and type safety, while OSGi relies on runtime configuration loading with the use of declarative services.
4. **Dependency Injection**: Micronaut uses a compile-time, reflection-free dependency injection model, which helps with faster startup times and lower memory consumption, whereas OSGi uses a dynamic dependency injection model.
5. **Size and Footprint**: Micronaut applications have a smaller memory footprint and faster startup times due to its optimized design, while OSGi applications may have a larger memory footprint and slower startup times due to the overhead of managing modules and dynamic components.
6. **Tooling and Ecosystem**: Micronaut provides a comprehensive set of tools and integrations for building modern applications, while OSGi has a mature ecosystem with tools and frameworks tailored for OSGi-based development but may not be as extensive or modern as those available for Micronaut.

In Summary, Micronaut Framework and OSGi differ in their architecture, programming model, configuration management, dependency injection, size and footprint, as well as tooling and ecosystem support for developers.