StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Micronaut Framework vs Spring Batch

Micronaut Framework vs Spring Batch

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring Batch
Spring Batch
Stacks184
Followers250
Votes0
GitHub Stars2.9K
Forks2.5K
Micronaut Framework
Micronaut Framework
Stacks186
Followers330
Votes52

Micronaut Framework vs Spring Batch: What are the differences?

Introduction: Micronaut Framework and Spring Batch are two popular frameworks used for developing enterprise applications. While both frameworks have their own strengths and features, there are key differences between the two. In this article, we will explore these differences and understand when to choose one over the other.

  1. Architecture and Design Philosophy: Micronaut is built with a focus on low memory footprint and fast startup times, using compile-time dependency injection. On the other hand, Spring Batch follows the traditional Spring approach, emphasizing abstraction and configuration-driven development.

  2. Language Support: Micronaut is primarily built with support for the Java programming language. It extensively uses annotation processors to generate the code necessary for dependency injection and other features. Spring Batch, on the other hand, provides support for multiple programming languages, including Java, Kotlin, and Groovy.

  3. Runtime Reflection: Micronaut heavily relies on compile-time processing to minimize runtime reflection. This approach leads to better performance and startup times. In contrast, Spring Batch uses extensive runtime reflection, making it more flexible and suitable for dynamic environments.

  4. Microservices and Cloud-Native Development: Micronaut is designed for building microservices and cloud-native applications. It natively integrates with popular cloud platforms like AWS, Azure, and Google Cloud. Spring Batch, while it can also be used in microservices architecture, has a broader focus on enterprise application development.

  5. Modularity and Size: Micronaut follows a modular architecture, allowing developers to include only the necessary parts of the framework, resulting in smaller and more lightweight applications. Spring Batch, being part of the larger Spring ecosystem, is more feature-rich but also comes with a larger footprint.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Spring Batch has a larger and more established community with extensive documentation, tutorials, and third-party integrations. Micronaut, being a relatively newer framework, is rapidly growing but still has a smaller ecosystem and community support.

In summary, Micronaut Framework is a lightweight, cloud-native, and highly performant framework built with a focus on low memory footprint and fast startup times. Spring Batch, on the other hand, is a comprehensive enterprise framework with a larger ecosystem and more flexibility, especially suitable for dynamic environments and existing Spring users. Ultimately, the choice between the two depends on the specific requirements and goals of the project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spring Batch
Spring Batch
Micronaut Framework
Micronaut Framework

It is designed to enable the development of robust batch applications vital for the daily operations of enterprise systems. It also provides reusable functions that are essential in processing large volumes of records, including logging/tracing, transaction management, job processing statistics, job restart, skip, and resource management.

It is a modern, JVM-based, full-stack framework for building modular, easily testable microservice and serverless applications. It features a Dependency Injection and Aspect-Oriented Programming runtime that uses no reflection.

Transaction management; Chunk based processing; Declarative I/O
build testable microservice ; build serverless applications; JVM based framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
2.9K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
2.5K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
184
Stacks
186
Followers
250
Followers
330
Votes
0
Votes
52
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 12
    Compilable to machine code
  • 8
    Tiny memory footprint
  • 7
    Open source
  • 7
    Almost instantaneous startup
  • 6
    Tiny compiled code size
Cons
  • 3
    No hot reload
Integrations
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
MongoDB
MongoDB
GraalVM
GraalVM
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java
Groovy
Groovy

What are some alternatives to Spring Batch, Micronaut Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase