StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Frameworks
  5. Micronaut Framework vs Spring MVC

Micronaut Framework vs Spring MVC

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Spring MVC
Spring MVC
Stacks479
Followers519
Votes0
GitHub Stars59.1K
Forks38.8K
Micronaut Framework
Micronaut Framework
Stacks186
Followers330
Votes52

Micronaut Framework vs Spring MVC: What are the differences?

Introduction: This markdown will outline the key differences between the Micronaut Framework and Spring MVC.

  1. Scope of Frameworks: Micronaut is positioned as a lightweight, fast, and efficient framework that aims to reduce startup time and memory footprint, particularly suitable for microservices architecture. On the other hand, Spring MVC is a robust, mature framework with a wide range of features catering to various application types, including web applications, REST APIs, and more.

  2. Dependency Injection: In terms of dependency injection, both frameworks support dependency injection, with Micronaut utilizing compile-time processing for DI, whereas Spring MVC uses runtime reflection for IoC container management. This leads to quicker startup times in Micronaut and potential performance benefits.

  3. Annotation Processing: Micronaut relies heavily on compile-time annotation processing to achieve high speed and low memory consumption, while Spring MVC favors runtime reflection for handling annotations. This affects the efficiency and performance of the applications built on these frameworks.

  4. Start Time and Performance: Due to its focus on reduced startup times and minimal memory usage, Micronaut has a significant advantage in terms of faster start times compared to Spring MVC. This can be crucial in scenarios where rapid scaling and quick deployment are essential.

  5. Testing Capabilities: Micronaut provides built-in support for writing unit tests without requiring a running server, making it easier to write and execute tests. In contrast, Spring MVC may rely more on integration testing, involving the setup of a server environment to run tests, leading to potential complexities in testing scenarios.

  6. Community and Ecosystem: Spring MVC, being a well-established framework, has a larger community and a wide range of third-party libraries, extensions, and integrations available, providing developers with extensive resources and support. Micronaut, being newer, has a growing community and ecosystem but may have limitations in terms of mature community-driven resources.

In Summary, the Micronaut Framework and Spring MVC differ in their scope, dependency injection approach, annotation processing, startup performance, testing capabilities, and community support, making them suitable for distinct application scenarios.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Spring MVC
Spring MVC
Micronaut Framework
Micronaut Framework

A Java framework that follows the Model-View-Controller design pattern and provides an elegant solution to use MVC in spring framework by the help of DispatcherServlet.

It is a modern, JVM-based, full-stack framework for building modular, easily testable microservice and serverless applications. It features a Dependency Injection and Aspect-Oriented Programming runtime that uses no reflection.

Clear separation of roles; Customizable binding and validation; Adaptability; Flexibility
build testable microservice ; build serverless applications; JVM based framework
Statistics
GitHub Stars
59.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
38.8K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
479
Stacks
186
Followers
519
Followers
330
Votes
0
Votes
52
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 12
    Compilable to machine code
  • 8
    Tiny memory footprint
  • 7
    Open source
  • 7
    Almost instantaneous startup
  • 6
    Tiny compiled code size
Cons
  • 3
    No hot reload
Integrations
AngularJS
AngularJS
Bootstrap
Bootstrap
Spring Boot
Spring Boot
Hibernate
Hibernate
GraalVM
GraalVM
Kotlin
Kotlin
Java
Java
Groovy
Groovy

What are some alternatives to Spring MVC, Micronaut Framework?

Node.js

Node.js

Node.js uses an event-driven, non-blocking I/O model that makes it lightweight and efficient, perfect for data-intensive real-time applications that run across distributed devices.

Rails

Rails

Rails is a web-application framework that includes everything needed to create database-backed web applications according to the Model-View-Controller (MVC) pattern.

Django

Django

Django is a high-level Python Web framework that encourages rapid development and clean, pragmatic design.

Laravel

Laravel

It is a web application framework with expressive, elegant syntax. It attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as authentication, routing, sessions, and caching.

.NET

.NET

.NET is a general purpose development platform. With .NET, you can use multiple languages, editors, and libraries to build native applications for web, mobile, desktop, gaming, and IoT for Windows, macOS, Linux, Android, and more.

ASP.NET Core

ASP.NET Core

A free and open-source web framework, and higher performance than ASP.NET, developed by Microsoft and the community. It is a modular framework that runs on both the full .NET Framework, on Windows, and the cross-platform .NET Core.

Symfony

Symfony

It is written with speed and flexibility in mind. It allows developers to build better and easy to maintain websites with PHP..

Spring

Spring

A key element of Spring is infrastructural support at the application level: Spring focuses on the "plumbing" of enterprise applications so that teams can focus on application-level business logic, without unnecessary ties to specific deployment environments.

Spring Boot

Spring Boot

Spring Boot makes it easy to create stand-alone, production-grade Spring based Applications that you can "just run". We take an opinionated view of the Spring platform and third-party libraries so you can get started with minimum fuss. Most Spring Boot applications need very little Spring configuration.

Android SDK

Android SDK

Android provides a rich application framework that allows you to build innovative apps and games for mobile devices in a Java language environment.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase