StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Databases
  5. Microsoft SQL Server vs Mongoose

Microsoft SQL Server vs Mongoose

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Stacks21.3K
Followers15.5K
Votes540
Mongoose
Mongoose
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.4K
Votes56

Microsoft SQL Server vs Mongoose: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this markdown code, I will provide the key differences between Microsoft SQL Server and Mongoose. Microsoft SQL Server is a relational database management system developed by Microsoft, while Mongoose is an object data modeling (ODM) library for MongoDB and Node.js.

  1. Data Structure: Microsoft SQL Server uses a structured data model, where data is organized in tables with predefined schema and relationships between tables. On the other hand, Mongoose is built for NoSQL databases like MongoDB, which use a flexible, document-based data model where data is stored in collections without a fixed schema.

  2. Query Language: Microsoft SQL Server uses SQL (Structured Query Language) for querying and manipulating data. It provides a rich set of SQL features for data retrieval, filtering, sorting, and aggregation. In contrast, Mongoose uses JavaScript-based queries to interact with MongoDB, allowing developers to use the flexibility and power of JavaScript to query and manipulate data.

  3. Transaction Support: Microsoft SQL Server provides full transaction support, allowing multiple operations to be grouped together in a transaction, ensuring that either all operations are successful or none are committed. Mongoose, on the other hand, does not natively support transactions in MongoDB. Although MongoDB supports transactions, Mongoose does not provide an abstraction layer for handling transactions.

  4. Scalability: Microsoft SQL Server is designed for scaling vertically, which means adding more resources (CPU, memory) to a single server to handle increased workload. It supports clustering to increase the performance and availability of the database. In contrast, MongoDB (and therefore Mongoose) is designed for horizontal scalability, which means adding more servers to distribute the workload. It provides sharding mechanisms to scale horizontally by partitioning data across multiple servers.

  5. Schema Flexibility: Microsoft SQL Server uses a rigid schema, where the structure of the database and tables are defined upfront. Any modifications to the schema require altering the database structure. In contrast, Mongoose allows flexible schema design and schema-less data storage in MongoDB. A document in a MongoDB collection can have varying fields and structures, making it easier to accommodate changing requirements.

  6. Compatibility: Microsoft SQL Server is primarily designed for Windows-based systems and has excellent integration with other Microsoft technologies. It supports Windows authentication and Active Directory integration. On the other hand, Mongoose is a library for Node.js, which is cross-platform and can be used on various operating systems. MongoDB, the database used by Mongoose, is also cross-platform and can run on Linux, macOS, and Windows platforms.

In summary, Microsoft SQL Server is a relational database management system with a structured data model, SQL query language, transaction support, vertical scalability, rigid schema, and compatibility with Windows systems. Mongoose, on the other hand, is an ODM library for MongoDB, which uses a flexible document-based data model, JavaScript-based queries, no transaction support in Mongoose itself, horizontal scalability, flexible schema, and compatibility with Node.js and multiple operating systems.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on Microsoft SQL Server, Mongoose

Erin
Erin

IT Specialist

Mar 10, 2020

Needs adviceonMicrosoft SQL ServerMicrosoft SQL ServerMySQLMySQLPostgreSQLPostgreSQL

I am a Microsoft SQL Server programmer who is a bit out of practice. I have been asked to assist on a new project. The overall purpose is to organize a large number of recordings so that they can be searched. I have an enormous music library but my songs are several hours long. I need to include things like time, date and location of the recording. I don't have a problem with the general database design. I have two primary questions:

  1. I need to use either @{MySQL}|tool:1025| or @{PostgreSQL}|tool:1028| on a @{Linux}|tool:10483| based OS. Which would be better for this application?
  2. I have not dealt with a sound based data type before. How do I store that and put it in a table? Thank you.
668k views668k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

Microsoft SQL Server
Microsoft SQL Server
Mongoose
Mongoose

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

Let's face it, writing MongoDB validation, casting and business logic boilerplate is a drag. That's why we wrote Mongoose. Mongoose provides a straight-forward, schema-based solution to modeling your application data and includes built-in type casting, validation, query building, business logic hooks and more, out of the box.

Statistics
Stacks
21.3K
Stacks
2.4K
Followers
15.5K
Followers
1.4K
Votes
540
Votes
56
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 139
    Reliable and easy to use
  • 101
    High performance
  • 95
    Great with .net
  • 65
    Works well with .net
  • 56
    Easy to maintain
Cons
  • 4
    Expensive Licensing
  • 2
    Microsoft
  • 1
    Replication can loose the data
  • 1
    Allwayon can loose data in asycronious mode
  • 1
    The maximum number of connections is only 14000 connect
Pros
  • 17
    Well documented
  • 17
    Several bad ideas mixed together
  • 10
    JSON
  • 8
    Actually terrible documentation
  • 2
    Recommended and used by Valve. See steamworks docs
Cons
  • 3
    Model middleware/hooks are not user friendly
Integrations
No integrations available
Node.js
Node.js
MongoDB
MongoDB

What are some alternatives to Microsoft SQL Server, Mongoose?

MongoDB

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

SQLite

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase