StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Microframeworks
  4. Microframeworks
  5. Moleculer vs Simplify.Web

Moleculer vs Simplify.Web

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Moleculer
Moleculer
Stacks59
Followers88
Votes14
GitHub Stars6.3K
Forks597
Simplify.Web
Simplify.Web
Stacks1
Followers3
Votes8
GitHub Stars24
Forks10

Moleculer vs Simplify.Web: What are the differences?

  1. Architecture: Moleculer is built on the microservices architecture, allowing developers to create scalable and robust applications by breaking down the functionality into smaller independent services, while Simplify.Web follows a more monolithic approach, providing a simpler structure for smaller projects.

  2. Communication: Moleculer uses a built-in transportation layer and supports various communication protocols such as TCP, Redis, NATS, MQTT, Kafka, etc., while Simplify.Web primarily relies on HTTP for communication between components.

  3. Features: Moleculer offers a wide range of built-in features like service discovery, load balancing, circuit breakers, caching, metrics, and tracing, making it suitable for complex distributed systems, whereas Simplify.Web focuses more on providing a lightweight framework with essential features for rapid application development.

  4. Language Support: Moleculer supports various languages like JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, and Java, allowing developers to choose their preferred language for building services, while Simplify.Web is primarily focused on JavaScript and TypeScript development.

  5. Community Support: Moleculer has a larger and more active community, providing extensive documentation, tutorials, and plugins to facilitate development, whereas Simplify.Web has a smaller community but offers a more concise and focused approach to web development.

  6. Scalability: Moleculer is designed for high scalability, supporting clusters of nodes to handle heavy loads and ensuring fault tolerance, while Simplify.Web may require additional configurations and external tools to achieve the same level of scalability in larger applications.

In Summary, Moleculer and Simplify.Web differ in architecture, communication methods, features, language support, community size, and scalability capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Moleculer
Moleculer
Simplify.Web
Simplify.Web

It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.

It is a lightweight and fast server-side .NET web-framework based on MVC and OWIN for building HTTP based web-applications, RESTful APIs etc.

Blazing fast; Extensible; Open source; Fault tolerance
Comes as Microsoft.AspNetCore OWIN middleware; Can be used as an API backend only with front-end frameworks; Based on MVC and MVVM patterns; Lightweight & Fast; Uses switchable IOC container for itself and controllers, views constructor injection (Simplify.DI); Support async controllers; Supports controllers which can be run on any request; Localization-friendly (supports templates, strings and data files localization by default); Uses fast templates engine (Simplify.Templates); Mocking-friendly; Mono-friendly
Statistics
GitHub Stars
6.3K
GitHub Stars
24
GitHub Forks
597
GitHub Forks
10
Stacks
59
Stacks
1
Followers
88
Followers
3
Votes
14
Votes
8
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 3
    Many integrations out of the box (db,messaging,tracing)
  • 3
    Typescript
  • 3
    Complete microservices ecosystem without lerning curve
  • 2
    Node.js
  • 2
    High performance
Pros
  • 1
    Super fast
  • 1
    Lightweight
  • 1
    Supports localization out of the box
  • 1
    Easy to use
  • 1
    .NET
Integrations
MongoDB
MongoDB
PostgreSQL
PostgreSQL
Node.js
Node.js
MSSQL
MSSQL
MySQL
MySQL
SQLite
SQLite
.NET
.NET
Microsoft IIS
Microsoft IIS

What are some alternatives to Moleculer, Simplify.Web?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

TypeORM

TypeORM

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot