Moleculer vs TypeORM

Overview

TypeORM

Stacks756

Followers813

Votes81

GitHub Stars36.0K

Forks6.5K

Moleculer

Stacks59

Followers88

Votes14

GitHub Stars6.3K

Forks597

Moleculer vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

Service-oriented vs. Data-access focused: Moleculer is a service-oriented framework that focuses on building microservices with inter-communication capabilities, while TypeORM is a data-access focused library that aids in database interactions and entity modeling.
Transporter Layer: Moleculer utilizes a built-in transporter layer to facilitate communication between services, enabling both local and remote service calls. On the other hand, TypeORM does not provide a transporter layer as its primary focus is on managing database interactions.
Service Registry vs. Entity Repository: Moleculer includes a service registry that stores information about available services and their endpoints, facilitating service discovery and communication. In contrast, TypeORM provides an entity repository pattern for interacting with database entities, offering functionalities for CRUD operations.
Load Balancing: Moleculer offers built-in support for load balancing, enabling automatic distribution of requests among the available service instances to optimize performance and resource utilization. TypeORM, as a database library, does not provide load balancing features as its main purpose is data modeling and querying.
Scalability: Moleculer is designed with scalability in mind, allowing easy scaling of services across multiple instances or nodes, with built-in features for distributed computing and fault tolerance. While TypeORM can be used in a scalable architecture, it does not offer specific scalability features tailored for microservices architecture.
Integration with other tools: Moleculer provides seamless integration with various tools and libraries commonly used in the microservices ecosystem, such as API gateways, message brokers, and caching systems. TypeORM, being a database-focused library, integrates well with ORM-related tools and modules for data management and manipulation.

In Summary, Moleculer is a service-oriented framework designed for building microservices with a focus on communication and scalability, while TypeORM is a data-access library specializing in database interactions and entity modeling.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

TypeORM	Moleculer
It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.	It is a fault tolerant framework. It has built-in load balancer, circuit breaker, retries, timeout and bulkhead features. It is open source and free of charge project.
automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.	Blazing fast; Extensible; Open source; Fault tolerance
Statistics
GitHub Stars 36.0K	GitHub Stars 6.3K
GitHub Forks 6.5K	GitHub Forks 597
Stacks 756	Stacks 59
Followers 813	Followers 88
Votes 81	Votes 14
Pros & Cons
Pros 30 Typescript 12 Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser 9 Cons of TypeORM 9 Easy setup 7 Works in NodeJS, Browser, Ionic, Cordova and Electron p Cons 5 Completely abandoned by its creator 3 Too complex for what it does 2 Doesn't really support native javascript 1 Not proper/real type safety 1 Cannot use query on any relation	Pros 3 Many integrations out of the box (db,messaging,tracing) 3 Typescript 3 Complete microservices ecosystem without lerning curve 2 High performance 2 Node.js
Integrations
No integrations available	MongoDB PostgreSQL Node.js MSSQL MySQL SQLite

What are some alternatives to TypeORM, Moleculer?

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Moleculer vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

Service-oriented vs. Data-access focused: Moleculer is a service-oriented framework that focuses on building microservices with inter-communication capabilities, while TypeORM is a data-access focused library that aids in database interactions and entity modeling.
Transporter Layer: Moleculer utilizes a built-in transporter layer to facilitate communication between services, enabling both local and remote service calls. On the other hand, TypeORM does not provide a transporter layer as its primary focus is on managing database interactions.
Service Registry vs. Entity Repository: Moleculer includes a service registry that stores information about available services and their endpoints, facilitating service discovery and communication. In contrast, TypeORM provides an entity repository pattern for interacting with database entities, offering functionalities for CRUD operations.
Load Balancing: Moleculer offers built-in support for load balancing, enabling automatic distribution of requests among the available service instances to optimize performance and resource utilization. TypeORM, as a database library, does not provide load balancing features as its main purpose is data modeling and querying.
Scalability: Moleculer is designed with scalability in mind, allowing easy scaling of services across multiple instances or nodes, with built-in features for distributed computing and fault tolerance. While TypeORM can be used in a scalable architecture, it does not offer specific scalability features tailored for microservices architecture.
Integration with other tools: Moleculer provides seamless integration with various tools and libraries commonly used in the microservices ecosystem, such as API gateways, message brokers, and caching systems. TypeORM, being a database-focused library, integrates well with ORM-related tools and modules for data management and manipulation.

Moleculer vs TypeORM

Overview