StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Frameworks
  4. Javascript Utilities And Libraries
  5. Vanilla.JS vs momentjs

Vanilla.JS vs momentjs

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Moment.js
Moment.js
Stacks7.4K
Followers297
Votes0
GitHub Stars48.1K
Forks7.0K
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS
Stacks82
Followers85
Votes9

Vanilla.JS vs momentjs: What are the differences?

Introduction:

Markdown code is a lightweight markup language that is used to format text on websites. It provides a simple and easy way to add formatting to text, such as headings, lists, and links. In this task, I will be providing the key differences between Vanilla.js and Moment.js.

  1. Vanilla.js: Vanilla.js refers to writing JavaScript code without using any libraries or frameworks. It is the pure form of JavaScript.

    Moment.js: Moment.js is a JavaScript library that is used for manipulating, parsing, and formatting dates and times.

    The first key difference between Vanilla.js and Moment.js is their purpose. Vanilla.js is a general-purpose JavaScript language, while Moment.js is specifically designed for working with dates and times.

  2. Vanilla.js: When working with dates and times in Vanilla.js, developers have to write their own code to handle formatting, parsing, and other operations related to dates.

    Moment.js: Moment.js provides a wide range of built-in functions and methods for working with dates and times. It simplifies tasks such as parsing, formatting, adding or subtracting durations, comparing dates, and many others.

    The second key difference is the convenience and ease of use provided by Moment.js. It saves developers from writing complex code for common date and time operations.

  3. Vanilla.js: Vanilla.js does not have built-in support for internationalization, i.e., formatting dates and times according to different locales and languages.

    Moment.js: Moment.js has built-in support for internationalization. It allows developers to format dates and times according to different locales, including localized month names, weekday names, and other date components.

    The third key difference is the internationalization support provided by Moment.js. It simplifies the process of displaying dates and times in a localized format.

  4. Vanilla.js: In Vanilla.js, working with timezones requires manual handling and calculations. Developers have to consider factors such as daylight saving time and different time zones manually.

    Moment.js: Moment.js has built-in support for timezones. It allows developers to easily convert dates and times between different time zones and handle daylight saving time automatically.

    The fourth key difference is the timezone handling capabilities provided by Moment.js. It simplifies tasks related to converting and displaying dates and times in different time zones.

  5. Vanilla.js: Vanilla.js does not have built-in support for relative time formatting, i.e., displaying dates and times in a human-readable format such as "2 hours ago" or "in 3 days".

    Moment.js: Moment.js provides built-in support for relative time formatting. It allows developers to display dates and times in a human-readable format based on the current time.

    The fifth key difference is the relative time formatting feature provided by Moment.js. It simplifies the process of displaying dates and times in a user-friendly manner.

  6. Vanilla.js: Vanilla.js does not have built-in support for working with durations, i.e., calculating the difference between two dates or adding/subtracting a specific duration from a date.

    Moment.js: Moment.js provides built-in support for working with durations. It allows developers to easily calculate the difference between two dates, add or subtract a specific duration from a date, and perform other operations related to durations.

    The sixth key difference is the duration handling capabilities provided by Moment.js. It simplifies tasks related to calculating and manipulating durations.

In summary, the key differences between Vanilla.js and Moment.js are: Vanilla.js is a general-purpose JavaScript language, while Moment.js is specifically designed for working with dates and times; Moment.js provides convenience and ease of use for working with dates and times, whereas Vanilla.js requires developers to write their own code; Moment.js has built-in support for internationalization and timezones, while Vanilla.js does not; Moment.js also provides relative time formatting and duration handling capabilities, which are not available in Vanilla.js.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Moment.js
Moment.js
Vanilla.JS
Vanilla.JS

A javascript date library for parsing, validating, manipulating, and formatting dates.

It is a fast and cross-platform framework for building incredible, powerful JavaScript applications. it is the most lightweight framework available anywhere.

Statistics
GitHub Stars
48.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.0K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
7.4K
Stacks
82
Followers
297
Followers
85
Votes
0
Votes
9
Pros & Cons
No community feedback yet
Pros
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Web-components
  • 1
    NO CONVENTIONS
  • 1
    Unopinionated
  • 1
    Easy to learn
Cons
  • 2
    You need to build anything yourself

What are some alternatives to Moment.js, Vanilla.JS?

jQuery

jQuery

jQuery is a cross-platform JavaScript library designed to simplify the client-side scripting of HTML.

AngularJS

AngularJS

AngularJS lets you write client-side web applications as if you had a smarter browser. It lets you use good old HTML (or HAML, Jade and friends!) as your template language and lets you extend HTML’s syntax to express your application’s components clearly and succinctly. It automatically synchronizes data from your UI (view) with your JavaScript objects (model) through 2-way data binding.

React

React

Lots of people use React as the V in MVC. Since React makes no assumptions about the rest of your technology stack, it's easy to try it out on a small feature in an existing project.

Vue.js

Vue.js

It is a library for building interactive web interfaces. It provides data-reactive components with a simple and flexible API.

jQuery UI

jQuery UI

Whether you're building highly interactive web applications or you just need to add a date picker to a form control, jQuery UI is the perfect choice.

Svelte

Svelte

If you've ever built a JavaScript application, the chances are you've encountered – or at least heard of – frameworks like React, Angular, Vue and Ractive. Like Svelte, these tools all share a goal of making it easy to build slick interactive user interfaces. Rather than interpreting your application code at run time, your app is converted into ideal JavaScript at build time. That means you don't pay the performance cost of the framework's abstractions, or incur a penalty when your app first loads.

Underscore

Underscore

A JavaScript library that provides a whole mess of useful functional programming helpers without extending any built-in objects.

Flux

Flux

Flux is the application architecture that Facebook uses for building client-side web applications. It complements React's composable view components by utilizing a unidirectional data flow. It's more of a pattern rather than a formal framework, and you can start using Flux immediately without a lot of new code.

Famo.us

Famo.us

Famo.us is a free and open source JavaScript platform for building mobile apps and desktop experiences. What makes Famo.us unique is its JavaScript rendering engine and 3D physics engine that gives developers the power and tools to build native quality apps and animations using pure JavaScript.

Deno

Deno

It is a secure runtime for JavaScript and TypeScript built with V8, Rust, and Tokio.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase