StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Databases
  4. Odm
  5. Mongoose vs TypeORM

Mongoose vs TypeORM

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Mongoose
Mongoose
Stacks2.4K
Followers1.4K
Votes56
TypeORM
TypeORM
Stacks757
Followers813
Votes81
GitHub Stars36.0K
Forks6.5K

Mongoose vs TypeORM: What are the differences?

Both Mongoose and TypeORM are popular Node.js Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) libraries used for working with databases. Let's explore the key differences between the two.

  1. MongoDB vs. SQL Support: Mongoose is specifically designed for working with MongoDB, a NoSQL database, while TypeORM supports multiple SQL databases such as MySQL, PostgreSQL, SQLite, etc. Therefore, Mongoose is more suitable for projects using MongoDB, whereas TypeORM provides flexibility for projects using different SQL databases.

  2. Schema Definition and Data Models: Mongoose requires the explicit creation of schemas for defining the structure, properties, and validation rules of the data models. On the other hand, TypeORM utilizes decorators to define entities, properties, relationships, and validation rules. The schema definition approach of Mongoose is more explicit, whereas TypeORM provides a more declarative and decorator-based approach.

  3. Query Language and API: Mongoose provides a flexible and feature-rich query API that allows developers to perform complex queries on MongoDB, with support for filtering, sorting, paging, and aggregation. TypeORM, being an SQL-based ORM, leverages the SQL query language to perform database operations. The query language and API usage differ significantly between the two libraries depending on the underlying database technology.

  4. Data Validation and Type Checking: Mongoose offers built-in schema-based validation, allowing developers to define validation rules for documents in MongoDB. TypeORM, on the other hand, relies on the type system of TypeScript for type checking and validation during the development process. Mongoose provides more extensive validation capabilities, while TypeORM relies on the type system to ensure type safety and validity.

  5. Relationships and Associations: Mongoose has built-in support for defining relationships and associations between data models, including one-to-one, one-to-many, and many-to-many relationships. TypeORM also supports these relationships but requires manual configuration through decorators. Mongoose provides a more intuitive and straightforward way to define and work with relationships.

  6. Populating Related Data: Mongoose supports the concept of population, allowing developers to automatically retrieve and populate related data when querying documents. Populated data can be fetched from other collections based on defined relationships. TypeORM also provides similar functionality using the "eager loading" mechanism, but the implementation differs due to the underlying database technology and ORM architecture.

In summary, Mongoose and TypeORM are both popular Object-Relational Mapping (ORM) libraries, each catering to different JavaScript environments. Mongoose is a MongoDB ORM for Node.js, known for its flexibility and ease of use with MongoDB, while TypeORM is a TypeScript-based ORM that supports various databases, offering a robust and type-safe approach particularly suited for TypeScript applications using Node.js or the browser.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Mongoose
Mongoose
TypeORM
TypeORM

Let's face it, writing MongoDB validation, casting and business logic boilerplate is a drag. That's why we wrote Mongoose. Mongoose provides a straight-forward, schema-based solution to modeling your application data and includes built-in type casting, validation, query building, business logic hooks and more, out of the box.

It supports both Active Record and Data Mapper patterns, unlike all other JavaScript ORMs currently in existence, which means you can write high quality, loosely coupled, scalable, maintainable applications the most productive way.

-
automatically create the database table schemes based on your models; transparently insert / update / delete to the database your objects; map your selections from tables to JavaScript objects and map table columns to object properties; easily create one-to-one, many-to-one, one-to-many and many-to-many relations between tables; and much more.
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
36.0K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
6.5K
Stacks
2.4K
Stacks
757
Followers
1.4K
Followers
813
Votes
56
Votes
81
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 17
    Several bad ideas mixed together
  • 17
    Well documented
  • 10
    JSON
  • 8
    Actually terrible documentation
  • 2
    Recommended and used by Valve. See steamworks docs
Cons
  • 3
    Model middleware/hooks are not user friendly
Pros
  • 30
    Typescript
  • 12
    Supports MySQL, PostgreSQL, MariaDB, SQLite, MS SQL Ser
  • 9
    Cons of TypeORM
  • 9
    Easy setup
  • 7
    Promise Based
Cons
  • 5
    Completely abandoned by its creator
  • 3
    Too complex for what it does
  • 2
    Doesn't really support native javascript
  • 1
    Cannot use query on any relation
  • 1
    Not proper/real type safety
Integrations
Node.js
Node.js
MongoDB
MongoDB
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Mongoose, TypeORM?

ExpressJS

ExpressJS

Express is a minimal and flexible node.js web application framework, providing a robust set of features for building single and multi-page, and hybrid web applications.

Django REST framework

Django REST framework

It is a powerful and flexible toolkit that makes it easy to build Web APIs.

Sails.js

Sails.js

Sails is designed to mimic the MVC pattern of frameworks like Ruby on Rails, but with support for the requirements of modern apps: data-driven APIs with scalable, service-oriented architecture.

Sinatra

Sinatra

Sinatra is a DSL for quickly creating web applications in Ruby with minimal effort.

Lumen

Lumen

Laravel Lumen is a stunningly fast PHP micro-framework for building web applications with expressive, elegant syntax. We believe development must be an enjoyable, creative experience to be truly fulfilling. Lumen attempts to take the pain out of development by easing common tasks used in the majority of web projects, such as routing, database abstraction, queueing, and caching.

Slim

Slim

Slim is easy to use for both beginners and professionals. Slim favors cleanliness over terseness and common cases over edge cases. Its interface is simple, intuitive, and extensively documented — both online and in the code itself.

Fastify

Fastify

Fastify is a web framework highly focused on speed and low overhead. It is inspired from Hapi and Express and as far as we know, it is one of the fastest web frameworks in town. Use Fastify can increase your throughput up to 100%.

Falcon

Falcon

Falcon is a minimalist WSGI library for building speedy web APIs and app backends. We like to think of Falcon as the Dieter Rams of web frameworks.

hapi

hapi

hapi is a simple to use configuration-centric framework with built-in support for input validation, caching, authentication, and other essential facilities for building web applications and services.

FeathersJS

FeathersJS

Feathers is a real-time, micro-service web framework for NodeJS that gives you control over your data via RESTful resources, sockets and flexible plug-ins.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase