Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
MSSQL vs Sybase: What are the differences?
<Write Introduction here>
Storage: The basic difference between MSSQL and Sybase lies in the way they store data. MSSQL uses row-based storage, while Sybase uses page-based storage. In MSSQL, each row is stored individually, making it easy to retrieve specific pieces of data. On the other hand, Sybase stores data in fixed-size pages, which can impact the performance for certain types of queries.
Indexing: In terms of indexing, MSSQL and Sybase differ in their approach. MSSQL uses a B-tree index structure, which allows for efficient searching of data within a table. Sybase, on the other hand, utilizes a hash-based indexing technique, which can be faster for certain types of queries, but may not be as efficient for range queries.
Clustering: Another key difference between MSSQL and Sybase is in the way they handle clustering. MSSQL supports clustered indexes, which physically reorganize the data in the table to match the order of the index. In contrast, Sybase does not support clustered indexes but offers the concept of clustered tables, which organize the physical storage of tables in a specific order.
Transaction Management: MSSQL and Sybase differ in their transaction management capabilities. MSSQL supports multiple active result sets (MARS), which allows for executing multiple batches on the same connection. Sybase does not have native support for MARS, which can impact the performance of certain applications that require this feature.
Data Types: When it comes to data types, MSSQL and Sybase have some differences. MSSQL offers a wider range of data types compared to Sybase, which may be beneficial for applications that require specific data manipulation features. However, Sybase provides better support for large object types like text, image, and unitext.
Partitioning: In terms of partitioning capabilities, MSSQL and Sybase have distinct differences. MSSQL supports table and index partitioning, allowing for better management of large datasets. Sybase, on the other hand, has limited partitioning capabilities, which may impact performance and scalability for applications that require extensive data partitioning.
In Summary, the key differences between MSSQL and Sybase include storage mechanisms, indexing techniques, clustering options, transaction management capabilities, supported data types, and partitioning capabilities.
We are planning to migrate one of my applications from MSSQL to MySQL. Can someone help me with the version to select?. I have a strong inclination towards MySql 5.7. But, I see there are some standout features added in Mysql 8.0 like JSON_TABLE. Just wanted to know if the newer version has not compromised on its speed while giving out some add on features.
MySQL 8.0 is significantly better than MySQL 5.7. For all InnoDB row operations, you'll see a great performance improvement. Also, the time taken to process transactions is lower in MySQL 8.0. Moreover, there has been an improvement in managing read and read/write workloads.
MySQL AB doesn't implement anything in MySQL until they can find a way to do it efficiently and, often, more efficiently than other systems. So although I don't have experience with benchmarking JSON_TABLEs or similar new features, their development philosophy alone suggests that version 8 for the latest features would be a safe jump without sacrificing system performance.
While there's been some very clever techniques that has allowed non-natively supported geo querying to be performed, it is incredibly slow in the long game and error prone at best.
MySQL finally introduced it's own GEO functions and special indexing operations for GIS type data. I prototyped with this, as MySQL is the most familiar database to me. But no matter what I did with it, how much tuning i'd give it, how much I played with it, the results would come back inconsistent.
It was very disappointing.
I figured, at this point, that SQL Server, being an enterprise solution authored by one of the biggest worldwide software developers in the world, Microsoft, might contain some decent GIS in it.
I was very disappointed.
Postgres is a Database solution i'm still getting familiar with, but I noticed it had no built in support for GIS. So I hilariously didn't pay it too much attention. That was until I stumbled upon PostGIS and my world changed forever.
I happen to point my asp.net core web application from MSSQL to MySQL due to infrastructure costs associated with the former db. The application also had challenges creating a migration schema of asp.net membership on MySQL.
After a thorough research I figured out how to do it and also made a video and uploaded to youtube. You can check that here https://youtu.be/X4I0DUw6C84
The full source code for the demo template is available on github here http://bit.ly/2LWgacA
Pros of MSSQL
- Easy of use3
Pros of Sybase
- Sybase has at least 200000 from 15 years ago1
- Verry fast queries response1
- SAP Replication server este net superior replicarii din1
- Configurable with 2k,4k,8k,16k,32k data pages1
- Very good for application with high number of connectio1
- Replication server the best1
- HADR dont loose data1
- Max number of connection is 3500001
- HADR does not lose data is superior to Allwayson which1
- SAP Replication server is clearly superior to MS SQL Se1
- Multiple pools pools0
- Multiple buffer pools0
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of MSSQL
- License Cost1
- Vendor lock-in1