MySQL vs OrbitDB

Overview

MySQL

Stacks129.6K

Followers108.6K

Votes3.8K

GitHub Stars11.8K

Forks4.1K

OrbitDB

Stacks10

Followers60

Votes0

MySQL vs OrbitDB: What are the differences?

MySQL and OrbitDB are two popular databases that have their own strengths and weaknesses. Below are key differences between MySQL and OrbitDB.

Data Structure: MySQL is a traditional relational database that stores data in tables with rows and columns, following a structured schema design. On the other hand, OrbitDB is a decentralized database that uses a distributed hash table (DHT) to store data in a peer-to-peer network without a central server.
Consistency: In MySQL, transactions are ACID-compliant, ensuring data consistency and integrity. OrbitDB, being decentralized, may have eventual consistency due to the nature of the peer-to-peer network, requiring mechanisms to handle conflicts and ensure eventual consistency.
Scalability: MySQL can scale vertically by adding more resources to a single server or horizontally by sharding across multiple servers. OrbitDB is designed for horizontal scalability, as it can store data across multiple nodes in a decentralized network, allowing for high availability and fault-tolerance.
Access Control: MySQL has robust access control mechanisms for managing user permissions at the database, table, and row levels. OrbitDB, being decentralized, may have challenges in implementing traditional access control mechanisms due to the distributed nature of the network.
Query Language: MySQL uses SQL (Structured Query Language) for querying and managing data, providing a rich set of features for data manipulation. OrbitDB does not use SQL but instead relies on custom query interfaces or APIs specific to the decentralized nature of the database.
Deployment: MySQL is typically deployed on a centralized server or cluster of servers managed by a database administrator. OrbitDB can be deployed in a decentralized environment without the need for a central server, making it suitable for applications requiring peer-to-peer data storage.

In Summary, MySQL and OrbitDB differ in data structure, consistency, scalability, access control, query language, and deployment options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Advice on MySQL, OrbitDB

Kyle

Web Application Developer at Redacted DevWorks

Dec 3, 2019

Decidedon

PostGIS

While there's been some very clever techniques that has allowed non-natively supported geo querying to be performed, it is incredibly slow in the long game and error prone at best.

MySQL finally introduced it's own GEO functions and special indexing operations for GIS type data. I prototyped with this, as MySQL is the most familiar database to me. But no matter what I did with it, how much tuning i'd give it, how much I played with it, the results would come back inconsistent.

It was very disappointing.

I figured, at this point, that SQL Server, being an enterprise solution authored by one of the biggest worldwide software developers in the world, Microsoft, might contain some decent GIS in it.

I was very disappointed.

Postgres is a Database solution i'm still getting familiar with, but I noticed it had no built in support for GIS. So I hilariously didn't pay it too much attention. That was until I stumbled upon PostGIS and my world changed forever.

449k views449k

Comments

Ido

Mar 6, 2020

Decided

My data was inherently hierarchical, but there was not enough content in each level of the hierarchy to justify a relational DB (SQL) with a one-to-many approach. It was also far easier to share data between the frontend (Angular), backend (Node.js) and DB (MongoDB) as they all pass around JSON natively. This allowed me to skip the translation layer from relational to hierarchical. You do need to think about correct indexes in MongoDB, and make sure the objects have finite size. For instance, an object in your DB shouldn't have a property which is an array that grows over time, without limit. In addition, I did use MySQL for other types of data, such as a catalog of products which (a) has a lot of data, (b) flat and not hierarchical, (c) needed very fast queries.

575k views575k

Comments

Navraj

CEO at SuPragma

Apr 16, 2020

Needs adviceon

MySQL

PostgreSQL

I asked my last question incorrectly. Rephrasing it here.

I am looking for the most secure open source database for my project I'm starting: https://github.com/SuPragma/SuPragma/wiki

Which database is more secure? MySQL or PostgreSQL? Are there others I should be considering? Is it possible to change the encryption keys dynamically?

Thanks,

Raj

401k views401k

Comments

Detailed Comparison

MySQL	OrbitDB
The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.	It is a serverless, distributed, peer-to-peer database. It uses IPFS as its data storage and IPFS Pubsub to automatically sync databases with peers. It’s an eventually consistent database that uses CRDTs for conflict-free database merges making it an excellent choice for decentralized apps (dApps), blockchain applications and offline-first web applications.
-	Peer-to-Peer Database; Serverless; Automatically sync databases with peers
Statistics
GitHub Stars 11.8K	GitHub Stars -
GitHub Forks 4.1K	GitHub Forks -
Stacks 129.6K	Stacks 10
Followers 108.6K	Followers 60
Votes 3.8K	Votes 0
Pros & Cons
Pros 800 Sql 679 Free 562 Easy 528 Widely used 490 Open source Cons 16 Owned by a company with their own agenda 3 Can't roll back schema changes	No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available	Node.js

What are some alternatives to MySQL, OrbitDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

ArangoDB

A distributed free and open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values. Build high performance applications using a convenient SQL-like query language or JavaScript extensions.

InfluxDB

InfluxDB is a scalable datastore for metrics, events, and real-time analytics. It has a built-in HTTP API so you don't have to write any server side code to get up and running. InfluxDB is designed to be scalable, simple to install and manage, and fast to get data in and out.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

MySQL vs OrbitDB: What are the differences?

MySQL and OrbitDB are two popular databases that have their own strengths and weaknesses. Below are key differences between MySQL and OrbitDB.

Data Structure: MySQL is a traditional relational database that stores data in tables with rows and columns, following a structured schema design. On the other hand, OrbitDB is a decentralized database that uses a distributed hash table (DHT) to store data in a peer-to-peer network without a central server.
Consistency: In MySQL, transactions are ACID-compliant, ensuring data consistency and integrity. OrbitDB, being decentralized, may have eventual consistency due to the nature of the peer-to-peer network, requiring mechanisms to handle conflicts and ensure eventual consistency.
Scalability: MySQL can scale vertically by adding more resources to a single server or horizontally by sharding across multiple servers. OrbitDB is designed for horizontal scalability, as it can store data across multiple nodes in a decentralized network, allowing for high availability and fault-tolerance.
Access Control: MySQL has robust access control mechanisms for managing user permissions at the database, table, and row levels. OrbitDB, being decentralized, may have challenges in implementing traditional access control mechanisms due to the distributed nature of the network.
Query Language: MySQL uses SQL (Structured Query Language) for querying and managing data, providing a rich set of features for data manipulation. OrbitDB does not use SQL but instead relies on custom query interfaces or APIs specific to the decentralized nature of the database.
Deployment: MySQL is typically deployed on a centralized server or cluster of servers managed by a database administrator. OrbitDB can be deployed in a decentralized environment without the need for a central server, making it suitable for applications requiring peer-to-peer data storage.

In Summary, MySQL and OrbitDB differ in data structure, consistency, scalability, access control, query language, and deployment options.