Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
MySQL WorkBench vs pgAdmin: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will be discussing the key differences between MySQL Workbench and pgAdmin, which are two popular database management tools. These tools offer functionalities to developers, administrators, and other users for managing databases. Understanding the differences between them can help users choose the most suitable tool for their specific requirements.
User Interface and Layout: MySQL Workbench has a more modern and visually appealing user interface compared to pgAdmin. It provides a graphical representation of the database schema and offers a user-friendly layout for managing tables, queries, and other database objects. On the other hand, pgAdmin has a more simplistic and less visually appealing interface, with a focus on providing a comprehensive set of features and functionalities.
Supported Databases: MySQL Workbench is specifically designed for managing MySQL databases, making it the ideal choice for users working with MySQL-based applications. On the other hand, pgAdmin is intended for managing PostgreSQL databases, allowing users to interact with PostgreSQL-specific features like JSON data types and full-text search capabilities.
Platform Compatibility: MySQL Workbench is available for multiple platforms, including Windows, macOS, and Linux, making it accessible to a wide range of users. In contrast, pgAdmin can be installed on Windows, macOS, and Linux as well, but it can also be accessed through a web interface, providing more flexibility for users who prefer browser-based tools.
Database Modeling Tools: MySQL Workbench offers comprehensive database modeling tools, allowing users to design and visualize their database schema using entity-relationship diagrams (ERDs). These modeling features make it easier to understand the structure of the database and can be helpful for database design and documentation. While pgAdmin does not have built-in database modeling capabilities, it does offer support for import and export of SQL scripts generated from other modeling tools.
Performance Monitoring and Tuning: MySQL Workbench includes performance monitoring and tuning features that allow users to analyze the performance of their MySQL database and optimize it for better efficiency. It provides detailed insights into query execution plans, indexes, and server status variables. On the other hand, pgAdmin does not have built-in performance monitoring and tuning capabilities, requiring users to rely on other tools or command-line utilities for such tasks.
Backup and Restore: MySQL Workbench offers a straightforward backup and restore functionality, allowing users to create backups of their MySQL databases and restore them when needed. It provides options to customize the backup process, including backup method, compression, and encryption. In comparison, pgAdmin also provides backup and restore features for PostgreSQL databases, with options to perform full or incremental backups and specify backup formats.
In summary, the key differences between MySQL Workbench and pgAdmin include the user interface and layout, supported databases, platform compatibility, database modeling tools, performance monitoring and tuning capabilities, as well as backup and restore functionalities. Each tool offers unique features and advantages, and the choice between them depends on the specific requirements and preferences of the user.
I am looking to build an azure database that connects to my power bi application. Initially, I attempted to create an Azure SQL database, then realized I needed to have SQL Server Management Service in order to manage and connect between Azure SQL <=> Power BI, but since I am on a Mac, I had to use the complex installation as a workaround.
If MySQL Workbench can solve this (as the product is available on Mac), I am more than happy to proceed with this approach if it can achieve the same goal of connecting an azure database with my Power BI application
What I am trying to achieve is fairly simple: have an online cloud database that connects to my Power BI application
I am open to any other solutions as well
Thank you
As others have noted, MySQL Workbench cannot be used instead of Microsoft SQL Manager to manage Azure SQL (MS-SQL Server, I hate that Microsoft uses generic category names for their products).
If you're considering switching to MySQL (Possibly using Azure MySQL managed database), then please not that unlike MS-SQL Server, you do not need the MySQL Workbench to connect your application to MysQL: just use the correct driver for your stack, and you're all set (if your stack is using the .Net platform, use MySQL Connector/NET from: https://dev.mysql.com/downloads/connector/net/ ).
If you do want to use a graphical interface to maintain your MySQL database, then MySQL Workbench is a great choice, but you are not limited to it - as others have mentioned, there is a plethora of competing graphical database management tools that would work just as well with MySQL - one of the advantages of choosing MySQL for your stack is the huge eco-system that is built around it.
Hello Could you give us a better idea of what Data Base Management System (DBMS) you are using at Azure? MySQL Workbench and Microsoft SQL Server Management Studio (SSMS) are tools developed to exclusively manage MySQL and SQL Server, respectively. If you need to manage multiple DBMS's from a single tool, I sugget you try DBeaver. There are also another alternatives: HeidiSQL, phpMyAdmin, etc. Regarding the DBMS itself, I suggest you stick with SQL Server. In my opinion it's more stable and has more features than MySQL - especially in the Standard and Enterprise editions. Regards, Lawrence
Microsoft provides an application known as Azure Data Studio that runs on Windows, Mac and Linux machines. It provides the ability to manage an Azure SQL database, as well as connecting to standard SQL Server databases. https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/sql/azure-data-studio/what-is?view=sql-server-ver15
As far as I know, MySQL Workbench doesn't handle Microsoft connections, including Azure, you should try Microsoft solutions such as MS VS Code.
Hi Aashwiin, Looking at your stack (https://stackshare.io/aashwiin82347/my-stack), it seems you are using Azure SQL Databases. I'll infer this is Microsoft SQL Server. Therefore, it certainly makes sense you stick with some of the official Microsoft Tooling to connect to it, query and administer it. You'd only be looking at MySQL Query Workbench, if you were running and connecting to a MySQL Database. - That said, could Azure MySQL (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/azure/mysql/overview) be an option for you a this point? MySQL offers great performance. I have been running it at various companies (under AWS/RDS and AWS/Aurora) and have no reason to switch over to anything else. - Decision making-wise, how much do your want your local sql/mysql client to influence/weigh in your architecture/technology decisions, though? This can be a slippery slope. - Alternatively, other clients exist, such as "Table Plus" and allow you to connect, on Mac, to a variety of database servers, including SQL Server. It might be worth giving it a try.
We were looking a tool that would allow us to do MySQL and PostgreSQL development/administration from a single tool. We decided on Navicat Premium because it can connect to MySQL, MariaDB, MongoDB, SQL Server, Oracle, PostgreSQL, and SQLite databases - and simultaneously. It's also compatible with Amazon RDS and Microsoft Azure, which we also use.
Moreover, we previously experienced the occasional freezing and crashing in MySQL Workbench. It also suffered from a poor design, with certain features being a bit difficult to find. Meanwhile, phpMyAdmin lacked schema visualization tools and seemed better suited to lightweight day to day transactions than some of the big jobs that we needed to do.
Pros of MySQL WorkBench
- Free7
- Simple7
- Easy to use6
- Clean UI5
- Administration and monitoring module3