Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!
NCache vs Redis: What are the differences?
Introduction
In this article, we will discuss the key differences between NCache and Redis. NCache and Redis are both popular in-memory distributed caching solutions, but they have some fundamental differences in terms of architecture and features.
Scalability: NCache offers horizontal scalability by distributing the cache across multiple servers, making it highly scalable for high-volume applications. On the other hand, Redis provides scalability through replication, where data is replicated across multiple instances, but it does not support direct horizontal scalability.
Data Persistence: NCache provides built-in support for data persistence, allowing cached data to be stored permanently on disk. This ensures data durability even in case of server failures. Redis, on the other hand, relies on asynchronous disk writes for persistence, which may result in data loss in case of unexpected failures.
Data Structure Support: Redis is known for its extensive support of various data structures, such as strings, lists, sets, hashes, and sorted sets. It also provides a rich set of operations to manipulate these data structures. NCache, on the other hand, primarily focuses on key-value caching and does not offer the same level of support for complex data structures.
High Availability: NCache offers high availability through features like synchronous replication, failover, and automatic data backup to ensure uninterrupted access to the cache. Redis, on the other hand, relies on asynchronous replication and lacks built-in failover mechanisms, which can result in some downtime during failover scenarios.
Cache Management: NCache provides a user-friendly GUI-based management tool, which allows administrators to monitor and manage the cache cluster easily. It also provides features like cache monitoring, cache statistics, and real-time alerts. Redis, on the other hand, does not offer a built-in GUI for cache management and relies on command-line tools or third-party management tools.
Integration with Microsoft Ecosystem: NCache is specifically designed for the .NET ecosystem and provides tight integration with Microsoft technologies, such as ASP.NET, ADO.NET, and Entity Framework. It also supports distributed caching of session data for ASP.NET applications. Redis, on the other hand, is a more platform-agnostic solution and provides client libraries for various programming languages.
In Summary, NCache and Redis have key differences in terms of scalability, data persistence, data structure support, high availability, cache management, and integration with the Microsoft ecosystem.
Pros of NCache
Pros of Redis
- Performance886
- Super fast542
- Ease of use513
- In-memory cache444
- Advanced key-value cache324
- Open source194
- Easy to deploy182
- Stable164
- Free155
- Fast121
- High-Performance42
- High Availability40
- Data Structures35
- Very Scalable32
- Replication24
- Great community22
- Pub/Sub22
- "NoSQL" key-value data store19
- Hashes16
- Sets13
- Sorted Sets11
- NoSQL10
- Lists10
- Async replication9
- BSD licensed9
- Bitmaps8
- Integrates super easy with Sidekiq for Rails background8
- Keys with a limited time-to-live7
- Open Source7
- Lua scripting6
- Strings6
- Awesomeness for Free5
- Hyperloglogs5
- Transactions4
- Outstanding performance4
- Runs server side LUA4
- LRU eviction of keys4
- Feature Rich4
- Written in ANSI C4
- Networked4
- Data structure server3
- Performance & ease of use3
- Dont save data if no subscribers are found2
- Automatic failover2
- Easy to use2
- Temporarily kept on disk2
- Scalable2
- Existing Laravel Integration2
- Channels concept2
- Object [key/value] size each 500 MB2
- Simple2
Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions
Cons of NCache
Cons of Redis
- Cannot query objects directly15
- No secondary indexes for non-numeric data types3
- No WAL1