StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Payara vs nginx

Payara vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Payara
Payara
Stacks41
Followers73
Votes0
GitHub Stars903
Forks312

Payara vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

This Markdown code provides a comparison between Payara and nginx, highlighting their key differences. Payara and nginx are both web servers commonly used in the IT industry, but they have distinct features and functionalities that set them apart.

  1. Scalability and Load Balancing: Payara is a fully Java Enterprise Edition (Java EE) application server that offers strong scalability and built-in load balancing capabilities. It can distribute the workload across multiple nodes to handle high traffic efficiently. On the other hand, nginx is a lightweight and high-performance web server that excels at handling concurrent connections and balancing the load among backend servers. It is highly suitable for serving static content and acting as a reverse proxy.

  2. Supported Technologies: Payara is built on top of GlassFish, an open-source Java EE application server, and provides support for a wide range of Java EE technologies such as Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB), JavaServer Faces (JSF), and Java Persistence API (JPA). Meanwhile, nginx focuses on serving static and dynamic content efficiently using non-blocking event-driven architecture and supports various web technologies like HTTP/1.1, HTTP/2, SSL/TLS, and proxying requests to different backend servers.

  3. Configuration and Administration: Payara offers a comprehensive web-based administration console for configuring and managing various aspects of the server, including deployments, clustering, connection pools, and resource management. It also provides command-line interface (CLI) tools for scripting and automation. In contrast, nginx uses a plain text configuration file to define server settings and behaves as a standalone server, making it lightweight and easy to configure. However, it lacks a user-friendly graphical interface for administration.

  4. Flexibility and Extensibility: Payara, being a Java EE application server, provides a wide range of features and services out-of-the-box, including support for clustering, session replication, and dynamic scaling. It can be extended using Java EE libraries and custom components. On the other hand, nginx is highly extensible through modules that can be added to enhance its capabilities, such as adding caching, gzip compression, or integrating with other technologies like Lua scripting or JavaScript.

  5. Cache and Content Delivery: Payara has built-in support for caching using techniques like in-memory session replication, second-level caching, and distributed caching. It allows efficient content delivery by reducing the response time for frequently accessed data. Nginx also offers caching capabilities, allowing the server to store frequently accessed content in memory or disk and serve them directly without reprocessing. This improves performance and reduces the load on backend applications.

  6. High Availability and Failover: Payara supports high availability and failover mechanisms through its clustering capabilities and automatic session replication. It ensures that if one server node fails, the sessions and requests can seamlessly be transferred to another available node, providing uninterrupted service to users. Nginx also provides some high availability features like health checks, upstream server monitoring, and load balancing methods to distribute traffic. However, it primarily acts as a reverse proxy and relies on backend configuration for achieving full failover.

In summary, Payara is a robust Java EE application server that excels in scalability, supports various Java EE technologies, and offers a rich administration interface. On the other hand, nginx is a lightweight web server with excellent performance and extensibility, ideal for serving static content and acting as a reverse proxy.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Payara

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Payara
Payara

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

It Server is a drop in replacement for GlassFish Server Open Source Edition with quarterly releases containing enhancements, bug fixes and patches.

-
Full Web Based Administration Console; Fully Scriptable Command Line Interface; Full REST-based Management Console; Fully Instrumented via JMX; Supports Rolling Upgrades of Java EE Applications
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
903
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
312
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
41
Followers
61.9K
Followers
73
Votes
5.5K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
CentOS
CentOS
Oracle
Oracle
Windows
Windows
Ubuntu
Ubuntu

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Payara?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase