StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. ReactPHP vs nginx

ReactPHP vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
ReactPHP
ReactPHP
Stacks22
Followers78
Votes0

ReactPHP vs nginx: What are the differences?

Introduction

ReactPHP and nginx are both popular tools used in web development. While they serve different purposes, there are several key differences between the two.

  1. Architecture: ReactPHP is a library that allows for event-driven, non-blocking I/O operations in PHP. It provides a way to write scalable network servers and clients using event loops. On the other hand, nginx is a high-performance, open-source web server that can also function as a reverse proxy and load balancer. It is designed to handle a large number of concurrent connections and deliver static content efficiently.

  2. Language Support: ReactPHP is specifically designed for PHP applications, allowing developers to write asynchronous code in PHP. Nginx, on the other hand, is written in C and is language-agnostic, meaning it can be used with applications written in various programming languages.

  3. Deployment Options: ReactPHP is typically used as a library within a PHP application, meaning it is embedded within the application code. This allows for more flexibility in deployment options, as the entire application, including ReactPHP, can be deployed on any PHP-supported server. In contrast, nginx is a standalone web server that can be deployed and configured separately from the application code.

  4. Scalability: ReactPHP's event-driven architecture allows for high scalability, as it can handle a large number of concurrent connections efficiently. This makes it suitable for applications that require real-time, low-latency communication, such as chat applications or streaming services. Nginx also has excellent scalability, thanks to its asynchronous, non-blocking nature and efficient resource utilization.

  5. Configuration: ReactPHP requires developers to write code to handle events and define the desired behavior. This gives developers more control and flexibility but can also require more manual configuration. Nginx, on the other hand, uses a declarative configuration language that allows for easy configuration of various server settings and behavior. This makes it easier to configure and manage, especially for less experienced developers.

  6. Performance: ReactPHP's non-blocking, event-driven architecture can offer excellent performance, especially when handling a large number of simultaneous connections. It can be suitable for scenarios where high-performance and low-latency communication is required. Nginx is also known for its high performance, thanks to its efficient process/thread management and optimized event handling.

In summary, ReactPHP is a PHP library that enables event-driven, non-blocking I/O operations, allowing for scalable and high-performance applications. Nginx, on the other hand, is a standalone web server that excels in handling concurrent connections and delivering static content efficiently. Both tools have their strengths and are suited for different use cases.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, ReactPHP

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
ReactPHP
ReactPHP

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Aa low-level library for event-driven programming in PHP. At its core is an event loop, on top of which it provides low-level utilities

-
Production-ready; Rock-solid with stable long-term support (LTS) releases; Requires no extensions; Cross-platform; Supports legacy PHP 5.3+ and HHVM
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
22
Followers
61.9K
Followers
78
Votes
5.5K
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
No community feedback yet
Integrations
No integrations available
PHP
PHP
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)
HHVM (HipHop Virtual Machine)

What are some alternatives to NGINX, ReactPHP?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase