Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

NGINX

114.5K
61.8K
+ 1
5.5K
Squid

104
205
+ 1
17
Varnish

12.6K
2.7K
+ 1
370

Squid vs Varnish vs Nginx: What are the differences?

Squid, Varnish, and Nginx are popular web proxy and caching solutions that optimize the delivery of web content, enhance performance, and provide various features. Here are the key differences between Squid, Varnish, and Nginx:

  1. Purpose and Focus: Squid is a full-featured proxy caching server that primarily focuses on accelerating web traffic by caching frequently accessed content. Varnish is designed specifically for HTTP acceleration and caching, emphasizing performance and scalability. Nginx is a versatile web server that can also act as a reverse proxy and load balancer, making it suitable for handling both static and dynamic content delivery.

  2. Caching Mechanism: Squid and Varnish are specialized caching solutions with advanced caching mechanisms optimized for serving cached content quickly. Varnish's VCL (Varnish Configuration Language) allows fine-grained control over caching rules. Nginx also offers caching capabilities, but it's more commonly used as a general-purpose web server and proxy.

  3. Configuration Flexibility: Squid and Varnish offer robust configuration options that enable administrators to customize caching policies and behaviors. Varnish's VCL is especially powerful for creating complex caching strategies. Nginx provides a simpler configuration system suitable for both basic and advanced use cases.

  4. Performance and Scalability: Varnish is renowned for its exceptional performance and efficiency in caching and delivering content. It's designed to handle high-traffic loads and is often used in front of web applications. Squid also provides good performance but may not be as specialized for caching dynamic content as Varnish. Nginx is performant as a web server and reverse proxy, and it can handle caching to some extent.

  5. Content Delivery Use Cases: Varnish is well-suited for content-heavy websites, media streaming, and scenarios where caching plays a significant role in reducing server load. Squid is suitable for general web proxying and caching, including transparent proxying. Nginx can handle both static and dynamic content, making it versatile for various content delivery scenarios.

  6. Ecosystem and Community: Nginx boasts a large and active community, making it easy to find resources and support. Varnish also has a strong community and is known for its documentation. Squid has been around for a long time and has an established user base, but its community might be relatively smaller compared to Nginx and Varnish.

In summary, Squid, Varnish, and Nginx are each tailored to specific use cases within the realm of web caching and proxying. Varnish excels in high-performance content delivery, Squid is versatile for general proxying and caching, and Nginx serves as a flexible web server and reverse proxy with caching capabilities.

Advice on NGINX, Squid, and Varnish

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities. Ready, aim fire!

See more
Replies (1)
Simon Aronsson
Developer Advocate at k6 / Load Impact · | 4 upvotes · 757.3K views
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I would pick nginx over both IIS and Apace HTTP Server any day. Combine it with docker, and as you grow maybe even traefik, and you'll have a really flexible solution for serving http content where you can take sites and projects up and down without effort, easily move it between systems and dont have to handle any dependencies on your actual local machine.

See more
Needs advice
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server
and
NGINXNGINX

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

See more
Replies (3)
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

See more
Leandro Barral
Recommends
on
NGINXNGINX

I use nginx because its more flexible and easy to configure

See more
Christian Cwienk
Software Developer at SAP · | 1 upvotes · 720.9K views
Recommends
on
Apache HTTP ServerApache HTTP Server

I use Apache HTTP Server because it's intuitive, comprehensive, well-documented, and just works

See more
Manage your open source components, licenses, and vulnerabilities
Learn More
Pros of NGINX
Pros of Squid
Pros of Varnish
  • 1.5K
    High-performance http server
  • 894
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
  • 289
    Free
  • 288
    Scalability
  • 226
    Web server
  • 175
    Simplicity
  • 136
    Easy setup
  • 30
    Content caching
  • 21
    Web Accelerator
  • 15
    Capability
  • 14
    Fast
  • 12
    High-latency
  • 12
    Predictability
  • 8
    Reverse Proxy
  • 7
    Supports http/2
  • 7
    The best of them
  • 5
    Great Community
  • 5
    Lots of Modules
  • 5
    Enterprise version
  • 4
    High perfomance proxy server
  • 3
    Embedded Lua scripting
  • 3
    Streaming media delivery
  • 3
    Streaming media
  • 3
    Reversy Proxy
  • 2
    Blash
  • 2
    GRPC-Web
  • 2
    Lightweight
  • 2
    Fast and easy to set up
  • 2
    Slim
  • 2
    saltstack
  • 1
    Virtual hosting
  • 1
    Narrow focus. Easy to configure. Fast
  • 1
    Along with Redis Cache its the Most superior
  • 1
    Ingress controller
  • 4
    Easy to config
  • 2
    Web application accelerator
  • 2
    Cluster
  • 2
    Very Fast
  • 1
    ICP
  • 1
    High-performance
  • 1
    Very Stable
  • 1
    Open Source
  • 1
    Widely Used
  • 1
    Great community
  • 1
    ESI
  • 0
    Qq
  • 104
    High-performance
  • 67
    Very Fast
  • 57
    Very Stable
  • 44
    Very Robust
  • 37
    HTTP reverse proxy
  • 21
    Open Source
  • 18
    Web application accelerator
  • 11
    Easy to config
  • 5
    Widely Used
  • 4
    Great community
  • 2
    Essential software for HTTP

Sign up to add or upvote prosMake informed product decisions

Cons of NGINX
Cons of Squid
Cons of Varnish
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
    Be the first to leave a con
      Be the first to leave a con

      Sign up to add or upvote consMake informed product decisions

      What is NGINX?

      nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

      What is Squid?

      Squid reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. It runs on most available operating systems, including Windows and is licensed under the GNU GPL.

      What is Varnish?

      Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture.

      Need advice about which tool to choose?Ask the StackShare community!

      Jobs that mention NGINX, Squid, and Varnish as a desired skillset
      What companies use NGINX?
      What companies use Squid?
      What companies use Varnish?

      Sign up to get full access to all the companiesMake informed product decisions

      What tools integrate with NGINX?
      What tools integrate with Squid?
      What tools integrate with Varnish?

      Sign up to get full access to all the tool integrationsMake informed product decisions

      Blog Posts

      May 6 2020 at 6:34AM

      Pinterest

      JavaScriptC++Varnish+6
      5
      3608
      GitHubDockerReact+17
      42
      38308
      GitHubSlackNGINX+15
      28
      21300
      What are some alternatives to NGINX, Squid, and Varnish?
      HAProxy
      HAProxy (High Availability Proxy) is a free, very fast and reliable solution offering high availability, load balancing, and proxying for TCP and HTTP-based applications.
      lighttpd
      lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.
      Traefik
      A modern HTTP reverse proxy and load balancer that makes deploying microservices easy. Traefik integrates with your existing infrastructure components and configures itself automatically and dynamically.
      Caddy
      Caddy 2 is a powerful, enterprise-ready, open source web server with automatic HTTPS written in Go.
      Envoy
      Originally built at Lyft, Envoy is a high performance C++ distributed proxy designed for single services and applications, as well as a communication bus and “universal data plane” designed for large microservice “service mesh” architectures.
      See all alternatives