StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Squid vs Varnish vs nginx

Squid vs Varnish vs nginx

OverviewDecisionsComparisonAlternatives

Overview

NGINX
NGINX
Stacks115.0K
Followers61.9K
Votes5.5K
GitHub Stars28.4K
Forks7.6K
Varnish
Varnish
Stacks12.6K
Followers2.7K
Votes370
GitHub Stars887
Forks195
Squid
Squid
Stacks101
Followers205
Votes17
GitHub Stars2.7K
Forks594

Squid vs Varnish vs Nginx: What are the differences?

Squid, Varnish, and Nginx are popular web proxy and caching solutions that optimize the delivery of web content, enhance performance, and provide various features. Here are the key differences between Squid, Varnish, and Nginx:

  1. Purpose and Focus: Squid is a full-featured proxy caching server that primarily focuses on accelerating web traffic by caching frequently accessed content. Varnish is designed specifically for HTTP acceleration and caching, emphasizing performance and scalability. Nginx is a versatile web server that can also act as a reverse proxy and load balancer, making it suitable for handling both static and dynamic content delivery.

  2. Caching Mechanism: Squid and Varnish are specialized caching solutions with advanced caching mechanisms optimized for serving cached content quickly. Varnish's VCL (Varnish Configuration Language) allows fine-grained control over caching rules. Nginx also offers caching capabilities, but it's more commonly used as a general-purpose web server and proxy.

  3. Configuration Flexibility: Squid and Varnish offer robust configuration options that enable administrators to customize caching policies and behaviors. Varnish's VCL is especially powerful for creating complex caching strategies. Nginx provides a simpler configuration system suitable for both basic and advanced use cases.

  4. Performance and Scalability: Varnish is renowned for its exceptional performance and efficiency in caching and delivering content. It's designed to handle high-traffic loads and is often used in front of web applications. Squid also provides good performance but may not be as specialized for caching dynamic content as Varnish. Nginx is performant as a web server and reverse proxy, and it can handle caching to some extent.

  5. Content Delivery Use Cases: Varnish is well-suited for content-heavy websites, media streaming, and scenarios where caching plays a significant role in reducing server load. Squid is suitable for general web proxying and caching, including transparent proxying. Nginx can handle both static and dynamic content, making it versatile for various content delivery scenarios.

  6. Ecosystem and Community: Nginx boasts a large and active community, making it easy to find resources and support. Varnish also has a strong community and is known for its documentation. Squid has been around for a long time and has an established user base, but its community might be relatively smaller compared to Nginx and Varnish.

In summary, Squid, Varnish, and Nginx are each tailored to specific use cases within the realm of web caching and proxying. Varnish excels in high-performance content delivery, Squid is versatile for general proxying and caching, and Nginx serves as a flexible web server and reverse proxy with caching capabilities.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Advice on NGINX, Varnish, Squid

greg00m
greg00m

Mar 9, 2020

Needs advice

I am diving into web development, both front and back end. I feel comfortable with administration, scripting and moderate coding in bash, Python and C++, but I am also a Windows fan (i love inner conflict). What are the votes on web servers? IIS is expensive and restrictive (has Windows adoption of open source changed this?) Apache has the history but seems to be at the root of most of my Infosec issues, and I know nothing about nginx (is it too new to rely on?). And no, I don't know what I want to do on the web explicitly, but hosting and data storage (both cloud and tape) are possibilities.
Ready, aim fire!

766k views766k
Comments
jlp78
jlp78

May 31, 2019

ReviewonNGINXNGINX

I use nginx because it is very light weight. Where Apache tries to include everything in the web server, nginx opts to have external programs/facilities take care of that so the web server can focus on efficiently serving web pages. While this can seem inefficient, it limits the number of new bugs found in the web server, which is the element that faces the client most directly.

727k views727k
Comments
StackShare
StackShare

May 29, 2019

Needs advice

From a StackShare Community member: "We are a LAMP shop currently focused on improving web performance for our customers. We have made many front-end optimizations and now we are considering replacing Apache with nginx. I was wondering if others saw a noticeable performance gain or any other benefits by switching."

725k views725k
Comments

Detailed Comparison

NGINX
NGINX
Varnish
Varnish
Squid
Squid

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Varnish Cache is a web application accelerator also known as a caching HTTP reverse proxy. You install it in front of any server that speaks HTTP and configure it to cache the contents. Varnish Cache is really, really fast. It typically speeds up delivery with a factor of 300 - 1000x, depending on your architecture.

Squid reduces bandwidth and improves response times by caching and reusing frequently-requested web pages. Squid has extensive access controls and makes a great server accelerator. It runs on most available operating systems, including Windows and is licensed under the GNU GPL.

-
Powerful, feature-rich web cache;HTTP accelerator; Speed up the performance of your website and streaming services
-
Statistics
GitHub Stars
28.4K
GitHub Stars
887
GitHub Stars
2.7K
GitHub Forks
7.6K
GitHub Forks
195
GitHub Forks
594
Stacks
115.0K
Stacks
12.6K
Stacks
101
Followers
61.9K
Followers
2.7K
Followers
205
Votes
5.5K
Votes
370
Votes
17
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 1453
    High-performance http server
  • 895
    Performance
  • 730
    Easy to configure
  • 607
    Open source
  • 530
    Load balancer
Cons
  • 10
    Advanced features require subscription
Pros
  • 104
    High-performance
  • 67
    Very Fast
  • 57
    Very Stable
  • 44
    Very Robust
  • 37
    HTTP reverse proxy
Pros
  • 4
    Easy to config
  • 2
    Very Fast
  • 2
    Web application accelerator
  • 2
    Cluster
  • 1
    ESI

What are some alternatives to NGINX, Varnish, Squid?

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Passenger

Passenger

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Section

Section

Edge Compute Platform gives Dev and Ops engineers the access and control they need to run compute workloads on a distributed edge.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot