StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Infrastructure as a Service
  4. Virtualization Platform
  5. Nomad vs VMware vSphere

Nomad vs VMware vSphere

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Stacks608
Followers550
Votes30
Nomad
Nomad
Stacks256
Followers344
Votes32
GitHub Stars15.9K
Forks2.0K

Nomad vs VMware vSphere: What are the differences?

Introduction

In this article, we will discuss the key differences between Nomad and VMware vSphere, two popular platforms used for managing and orchestrating virtualized infrastructure. These platforms have distinct features and capabilities, making them suitable for different use cases.

  1. Deployment Model: Nomad is an open-source workload orchestrator developed by HashiCorp, whereas VMware vSphere is a proprietary virtualization platform. Nomad follows a lightweight and distributed deployment model, allowing users to run applications across a cluster of machines without requiring a centralized infrastructure. On the other hand, vSphere is a comprehensive virtualization solution that provides a centralized management platform for virtual machines, storage, and networking.

  2. Supported Workloads: Nomad is designed to run a wide range of workloads, including containerized, batch, and long-running applications. It supports multiple schedulers, allowing users to choose between different workload placement algorithms. In contrast, vSphere primarily focuses on virtual machine (VM) workloads and provides advanced features for VM management, such as resource allocation, live migration, and high availability.

  3. Scalability and Elasticity: Nomad is built to scale horizontally and can handle large clusters with thousands of nodes. It supports automatic scaling of applications based on resource utilization, enabling dynamic allocation of resources to meet workload demands. On the other hand, vSphere offers vertical scalability by allowing users to add more resources to a single VM, such as CPU and memory. It also provides features like vMotion for live migration of VMs between hosts.

  4. Networking and Storage Integration: Nomad integrates well with various networking and storage plugins, allowing users to leverage the capabilities of different providers. It supports network overlays, SDN integration, and integration with cloud storage solutions. In contrast, vSphere provides its own software-defined networking (SDN) solution called VMware NSX, which offers advanced network virtualization features. It also offers integration with enterprise storage systems through features like VMware vSAN.

  5. Ecosystem and Integrations: Nomad has a vibrant ecosystem and integrates well with various tools and technologies, including Kubernetes, Prometheus, and Grafana. It has a rich set of APIs and supports various deployment methodologies, making it compatible with existing infrastructure. VMware vSphere, on the other hand, has a well-established ecosystem and integrates tightly with other VMware products like vCenter, vRealize Suite, and vCloud Director.

  6. Licensing and Cost: Nomad is an open-source project and is available under the Apache 2 License. It can be used freely without any licensing costs. VMware vSphere, on the other hand, is a commercial product and is available under different licensing models, such as per-processor or per-VM licensing. The pricing varies based on the edition and features chosen, making it a significant factor for organizations considering these platforms.

Summary

In summary, Nomad and VMware vSphere differ in their deployment models, supported workloads, scalability, networking, integrations, and licensing. Nomad follows a lightweight and distributed approach, supporting various workloads and scaling horizontally, while vSphere focuses on virtual machine workloads, offering vertical scalability and advanced VM management features. Nomad has a vibrant ecosystem and is open source, while vSphere provides a comprehensive virtualization solution with tight integration with other VMware products. Pricing is another key differentiator, with Nomad being free and vSphere having commercial licensing options.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

VMware vSphere
VMware vSphere
Nomad
Nomad

vSphere is the world’s leading server virtualization platform. Run fewer servers and reduce capital and operating costs using VMware vSphere to build a cloud computing infrastructure.

Nomad is a cluster manager, designed for both long lived services and short lived batch processing workloads. Developers use a declarative job specification to submit work, and Nomad ensures constraints are satisfied and resource utilization is optimized by efficient task packing. Nomad supports all major operating systems and virtualized, containerized, or standalone applications.

Powerful Server Virtualization;Network Services;Efficient Storage;Consistent Automation;High Availability;Robust Security
Handles the scheduling and upgrading of the applications over time; With built-in dry-run execution, Nomad shows what scheduling decisions it will take before it takes them. Operators can approve or deny these changes to create a safe and reproducible workflow; Nomad runs applications and ensures they keep running in failure scenarios. In addition to long-running services, Nomad can schedule batch jobs, distributed cron jobs, and parameterized jobs; Stream logs, send signals, and interact with the file system of scheduled applications. These operator-friendly commands bring the familiar debugging tools to a scheduled world
Statistics
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Stars
15.9K
GitHub Forks
-
GitHub Forks
2.0K
Stacks
608
Stacks
256
Followers
550
Followers
344
Votes
30
Votes
32
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 8
    Strong host isolation
  • 6
    Industry leader
  • 5
    Great VM management (HA,FT,...)
  • 4
    Easy to use
  • 2
    Great Networking
Cons
  • 9
    Price
Pros
  • 7
    Built in Consul integration
  • 6
    Easy setup
  • 4
    Bult-in Vault integration
  • 3
    Built-in federation support
  • 2
    Autoscaling support
Cons
  • 3
    Easy to start with
  • 1
    Small comunity
  • 1
    HCL language for configuration, an unpopular DSL
Integrations
No integrations available
Consul
Consul
Docker
Docker
Vault
Vault

What are some alternatives to VMware vSphere, Nomad?

VirtualBox

VirtualBox

VirtualBox is a powerful x86 and AMD64/Intel64 virtualization product for enterprise as well as home use. Not only is VirtualBox an extremely feature rich, high performance product for enterprise customers, it is also the only professional solution that is freely available as Open Source Software under the terms of the GNU General Public License (GPL) version 2.

Proxmox VE

Proxmox VE

It is a complete open-source platform for all-inclusive enterprise virtualization that tightly integrates KVM hypervisor and LXC containers, software-defined storage and networking functionality on a single platform, and easily manages high availability clusters and disaster recovery tools with the built-in web management interface.

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos

Apache Mesos is a cluster manager that simplifies the complexity of running applications on a shared pool of servers.

DC/OS

DC/OS

Unlike traditional operating systems, DC/OS spans multiple machines within a network, aggregating their resources to maximize utilization by distributed applications.

KVM

KVM

KVM (for Kernel-based Virtual Machine) is a full virtualization solution for Linux on x86 hardware containing virtualization extensions (Intel VT or AMD-V).

Mesosphere

Mesosphere

Mesosphere offers a layer of software that organizes your machines, VMs, and cloud instances and lets applications draw from a single pool of intelligently- and dynamically-allocated resources, increasing efficiency and reducing operational complexity.

Qemu

Qemu

When used as a machine emulator, it can run OSes and programs made for one machine (e.g. an ARM board) on a different machine (e.g. your own PC). By using dynamic translation, it achieves very good performance. When used as a virtualizer, it achieves near native performance by executing the guest code directly on the host CPU. it supports virtualization when executing under the Xen hypervisor or using the KVM kernel module in Linux. When using KVM, it can virtualize x86, server and embedded PowerPC, 64-bit POWER, S390, 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, and MIPS guests.

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop

Parallels Desktop for Mac allows you to seamlessly run both Windows and MacOS applications side-by-side with speed, control and confidence.

Gardener

Gardener

Many Open Source tools exist which help in creating and updating single Kubernetes clusters. However, the more clusters you need the harder it becomes to operate, monitor, manage and keep all of them alive and up-to-date. And that is exactly what project Gardener focuses on.

YARN Hadoop

YARN Hadoop

Its fundamental idea is to split up the functionalities of resource management and job scheduling/monitoring into separate daemons. The idea is to have a global ResourceManager (RM) and per-application ApplicationMaster (AM).

Related Comparisons

GitHub
Bitbucket

Bitbucket vs GitHub vs GitLab

GitHub
Bitbucket

AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub

Kubernetes
Rancher

Docker Swarm vs Kubernetes vs Rancher

gulp
Grunt

Grunt vs Webpack vs gulp

Graphite
Kibana

Grafana vs Graphite vs Kibana