StackShareStackShare
Follow on
StackShare

Discover and share technology stacks from companies around the world.

Follow on

© 2025 StackShare. All rights reserved.

Product

  • Stacks
  • Tools
  • Feed

Company

  • About
  • Contact

Legal

  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms of Service
  1. Stackups
  2. Application & Data
  3. Platform as a Service
  4. Web Servers
  5. Oracle Weblogic Server vs Passenger

Oracle Weblogic Server vs Passenger

OverviewComparisonAlternatives

Overview

Passenger
Passenger
Stacks1.4K
Followers298
Votes199
GitHub Stars5.1K
Forks557
Oracle Weblogic Server
Oracle Weblogic Server
Stacks146
Followers112
Votes0

Oracle Weblogic Server vs Passenger: What are the differences?

<Oracle Weblogic Server vs Passenger>
  1. Deployment: Oracle WebLogic Server is a Java EE application server that supports the deployment of enterprise applications. It provides a wide range of tools and features to manage, deploy, and monitor applications in a Java environment. On the other hand, Passenger is a web application server designed to serve Ruby, Python, and Node.js applications. It differs from Oracle WebLogic Server in terms of language support and focus on web applications.

  2. Scalability: Oracle WebLogic Server is known for its scalability and high availability features, making it suitable for large-scale enterprise deployments. It can be clustered to handle a high number of requests and ensure system resilience. In contrast, Passenger is more lightweight and may not offer the same level of scalability as Oracle WebLogic Server, especially in demanding enterprise environments.

  3. Integration: Oracle WebLogic Server is tightly integrated with the Oracle stack and is often used in conjunction with Oracle databases, middleware, and other products. This integration provides a seamless environment for developing, deploying, and managing enterprise applications within the Oracle ecosystem. In contrast, Passenger is more standalone and can be integrated with various databases, web servers, and frameworks that support Ruby, Python, and Node.js.

  4. License and Cost: Oracle WebLogic Server is a proprietary software that requires a commercial license for production use, which can involve significant costs for organizations. On the other hand, Passenger is open-source and free to use, making it a cost-effective option for developers and small businesses looking to deploy web applications without incurring licensing expenses.

  5. Community Support: Oracle WebLogic Server has a robust support system provided by Oracle, with access to documentation, forums, and expert assistance for troubleshooting and optimization. In comparison, Passenger relies on its open-source community for support, which may not offer the same level of comprehensive resources and expertise as Oracle's official support channels.

  6. Feature Set: Oracle WebLogic Server offers a comprehensive set of features for Java EE applications, including support for various protocols, security mechanisms, clustering, and management tools. In contrast, Passenger focuses more on web application deployment and may lack some of the advanced features and customization options available in Oracle WebLogic Server.

In Summary, Oracle WebLogic Server and Passenger differ in terms of deployment focus, scalability, integration capabilities, licensing, community support, and feature sets.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs
CLI (Node.js)
or
Manual

Detailed Comparison

Passenger
Passenger
Oracle Weblogic Server
Oracle Weblogic Server

Phusion Passenger is a web server and application server, designed to be fast, robust and lightweight. It takes a lot of complexity out of deploying web apps, adds powerful enterprise-grade features that are useful in production, and makes administration much easier and less complex.

An application server for building and deploying enterprise Java EE applications with support for new features for lowering cost of operations, improving performance, enhancing scalability and supporting the Oracle Applications portfolio.

-
Java EE full platform support;High performance clustering;
Statistics
GitHub Stars
5.1K
GitHub Stars
-
GitHub Forks
557
GitHub Forks
-
Stacks
1.4K
Stacks
146
Followers
298
Followers
112
Votes
199
Votes
0
Pros & Cons
Pros
  • 43
    Nginx integration
  • 36
    Great for rails
  • 21
    Fast web server
  • 19
    Free
  • 15
    Lightweight
Cons
  • 0
    Cost (some features require paid/pro)
No community feedback yet
Integrations
NGINX
NGINX
Python
Python
Ruby
Ruby
Apache HTTP Server
Apache HTTP Server
Node.js
Node.js
Meteor
Meteor
No integrations available

What are some alternatives to Passenger, Oracle Weblogic Server?

NGINX

NGINX

nginx [engine x] is an HTTP and reverse proxy server, as well as a mail proxy server, written by Igor Sysoev. According to Netcraft nginx served or proxied 30.46% of the top million busiest sites in Jan 2018.

Apache HTTP Server

Apache HTTP Server

The Apache HTTP Server is a powerful and flexible HTTP/1.1 compliant web server. Originally designed as a replacement for the NCSA HTTP Server, it has grown to be the most popular web server on the Internet.

Unicorn

Unicorn

Unicorn is an HTTP server for Rack applications designed to only serve fast clients on low-latency, high-bandwidth connections and take advantage of features in Unix/Unix-like kernels. Slow clients should only be served by placing a reverse proxy capable of fully buffering both the the request and response in between Unicorn and slow clients.

Microsoft IIS

Microsoft IIS

Internet Information Services (IIS) for Windows Server is a flexible, secure and manageable Web server for hosting anything on the Web. From media streaming to web applications, IIS's scalable and open architecture is ready to handle the most demanding tasks.

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat

Apache Tomcat powers numerous large-scale, mission-critical web applications across a diverse range of industries and organizations.

Gunicorn

Gunicorn

Gunicorn is a pre-fork worker model ported from Ruby's Unicorn project. The Gunicorn server is broadly compatible with various web frameworks, simply implemented, light on server resources, and fairly speedy.

Jetty

Jetty

Jetty is used in a wide variety of projects and products, both in development and production. Jetty can be easily embedded in devices, tools, frameworks, application servers, and clusters. See the Jetty Powered page for more uses of Jetty.

lighttpd

lighttpd

lighttpd has a very low memory footprint compared to other webservers and takes care of cpu-load. Its advanced feature-set (FastCGI, CGI, Auth, Output-Compression, URL-Rewriting and many more) make lighttpd the perfect webserver-software for every server that suffers load problems.

Swoole

Swoole

It is an open source high-performance network framework using an event-driven, asynchronous, non-blocking I/O model which makes it scalable and efficient.

Puma

Puma

Unlike other Ruby Webservers, Puma was built for speed and parallelism. Puma is a small library that provides a very fast and concurrent HTTP 1.1 server for Ruby web applications.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap
Materialize

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Laravel
Django

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap
Foundation

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js
Spring Boot

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Liquibase
Flyway

Flyway vs Liquibase