OrbitDB vs VelocityDB

Overview

VelocityDB

Stacks1

Followers19

Votes0

OrbitDB

Stacks10

Followers60

Votes0

OrbitDB vs VelocityDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing OrbitDB and VelocityDB, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two databases.

Data Model: OrbitDB is a decentralized database that uses IPFS for distribution, which allows for shared databases among peers in a network. On the other hand, VelocityDB is an object-oriented database management system that stores data as objects and supports complex data relationships through object references.
Consistency: OrbitDB uses CRDTs (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types) to achieve eventual consistency in a distributed environment, ensuring that all peers reach the same state despite network partitions. VelocityDB, on the other hand, ensures strong consistency through ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties, making it ideal for transactional databases.
Scalability: OrbitDB scales horizontally by adding more peers to the network, distributing the load across multiple nodes. In comparison, VelocityDB can scale vertically by increasing the hardware resources of a single server, making it suitable for handling large datasets on a single machine efficiently.
Query Language: OrbitDB uses IPFS for data distribution, which means it does not support traditional query languages like SQL. Instead, it offers JavaScript functions for querying data stored in the database. VelocityDB, being an object-oriented database, supports querying through LINQ (Language Integrated Query) that allows developers to query data using C# or .NET languages.
Use Case: OrbitDB is well-suited for decentralized applications (dApps) that require data sharing and collaboration among peers without relying on a central authority. On the other hand, VelocityDB is more suitable for applications that require strong consistency, complex data relationships, and ACID compliance, such as enterprise systems, finance applications, and scientific research projects.

In Summary, understanding the differences between OrbitDB and VelocityDB is crucial for selecting the right database solution based on the specific requirements of a project.

Share your Stack

Help developers discover the tools you use. Get visibility for your team's tech choices and contribute to the community's knowledge.

View Docs

CLI (Node.js)

Manual

Detailed Comparison

VelocityDB	OrbitDB
It is a C# .NET NoSQL Object Database that can be Embedded/Distributed, extended as Graph Database is VelocityGraph. It supports both embedded and distributed deployments.	It is a serverless, distributed, peer-to-peer database. It uses IPFS as its data storage and IPFS Pubsub to automatically sync databases with peers. It’s an eventually consistent database that uses CRDTs for conflict-free database merges making it an excellent choice for decentralized apps (dApps), blockchain applications and offline-first web applications.
Acid Transactional; Android; Any CPU (32bit/64bit); Array support; Auto Increment on a field; Backup & Restore; Choice of data structure to use; Compression of data; Data Fragmentation	Peer-to-Peer Database; Serverless; Automatically sync databases with peers
Statistics
Stacks 1	Stacks 10
Followers 19	Followers 60
Votes 0	Votes 0
Integrations
MySQL PostgreSQL Velocity.js .NET GraphQL C#	Node.js

What are some alternatives to VelocityDB, OrbitDB?

MongoDB

MongoDB stores data in JSON-like documents that can vary in structure, offering a dynamic, flexible schema. MongoDB was also designed for high availability and scalability, with built-in replication and auto-sharding.

MySQL

The MySQL software delivers a very fast, multi-threaded, multi-user, and robust SQL (Structured Query Language) database server. MySQL Server is intended for mission-critical, heavy-load production systems as well as for embedding into mass-deployed software.

PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL is an advanced object-relational database management system that supports an extended subset of the SQL standard, including transactions, foreign keys, subqueries, triggers, user-defined types and functions.

Microsoft SQL Server

Microsoft® SQL Server is a database management and analysis system for e-commerce, line-of-business, and data warehousing solutions.

SQLite

SQLite is an embedded SQL database engine. Unlike most other SQL databases, SQLite does not have a separate server process. SQLite reads and writes directly to ordinary disk files. A complete SQL database with multiple tables, indices, triggers, and views, is contained in a single disk file.

Cassandra

Partitioning means that Cassandra can distribute your data across multiple machines in an application-transparent matter. Cassandra will automatically repartition as machines are added and removed from the cluster. Row store means that like relational databases, Cassandra organizes data by rows and columns. The Cassandra Query Language (CQL) is a close relative of SQL.

Memcached

Memcached is an in-memory key-value store for small chunks of arbitrary data (strings, objects) from results of database calls, API calls, or page rendering.

MariaDB

Started by core members of the original MySQL team, MariaDB actively works with outside developers to deliver the most featureful, stable, and sanely licensed open SQL server in the industry. MariaDB is designed as a drop-in replacement of MySQL(R) with more features, new storage engines, fewer bugs, and better performance.

RethinkDB

RethinkDB is built to store JSON documents, and scale to multiple machines with very little effort. It has a pleasant query language that supports really useful queries like table joins and group by, and is easy to setup and learn.

Amazon DynamoDB

With it , you can offload the administrative burden of operating and scaling a highly available distributed database cluster, while paying a low price for only what you use.

Related Comparisons

Bootstrap vs Materialize

Django vs Laravel vs Node.js

Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material UI

Node.js vs Spring-Boot

Flyway vs Liquibase

OrbitDB vs VelocityDB: What are the differences?

Introduction

When comparing OrbitDB and VelocityDB, it is essential to understand the key differences between the two databases.

Data Model: OrbitDB is a decentralized database that uses IPFS for distribution, which allows for shared databases among peers in a network. On the other hand, VelocityDB is an object-oriented database management system that stores data as objects and supports complex data relationships through object references.
Consistency: OrbitDB uses CRDTs (Conflict-free Replicated Data Types) to achieve eventual consistency in a distributed environment, ensuring that all peers reach the same state despite network partitions. VelocityDB, on the other hand, ensures strong consistency through ACID (Atomicity, Consistency, Isolation, Durability) properties, making it ideal for transactional databases.
Scalability: OrbitDB scales horizontally by adding more peers to the network, distributing the load across multiple nodes. In comparison, VelocityDB can scale vertically by increasing the hardware resources of a single server, making it suitable for handling large datasets on a single machine efficiently.
Query Language: OrbitDB uses IPFS for data distribution, which means it does not support traditional query languages like SQL. Instead, it offers JavaScript functions for querying data stored in the database. VelocityDB, being an object-oriented database, supports querying through LINQ (Language Integrated Query) that allows developers to query data using C# or .NET languages.
Use Case: OrbitDB is well-suited for decentralized applications (dApps) that require data sharing and collaboration among peers without relying on a central authority. On the other hand, VelocityDB is more suitable for applications that require strong consistency, complex data relationships, and ACID compliance, such as enterprise systems, finance applications, and scientific research projects.

In Summary, understanding the differences between OrbitDB and VelocityDB is crucial for selecting the right database solution based on the specific requirements of a project.