Owin vs uWSGI
Overview
Detailed Comparison
The uWSGI project aims at developing a full stack for building hosting services. | It is a standard for an interface between .NET Web applications and Web servers. It is a community-owned open-source project. |
Statistics | |
GitHub Stars 3.5K | GitHub Stars 156 |
GitHub Forks 699 | GitHub Forks 47 |
Stacks 256 | Stacks 204 |
Followers 311 | Followers 20 |
Votes 12 | Votes 0 |
Pros & Cons | |
Pros
| No community feedback yet |
Integrations | |
What are some alternatives to uWSGI, Owin?
Waitress
It is meant to be a production-quality pure-Python WSGI server with very acceptable performance. It has no dependencies except ones which live in the Python standard library. It runs on CPython on Unix and Windows under Python 2.7+ and Python 3.4+. It is also known to run on PyPy 1.6.0 on UNIX.
Xen Orchestra
It provides a web based UI for the management of XenServer installations without requiring any agent or extra software on your hosts nor VMs.
Werbot
It is basically a platform for storing, sharing, and managing server access. But the most valuable part of it concerns the possibility to do an audit and to control the work performed on the server. Our platform can be integrated as an independent service in company infrastructure. It doesn’t change the way developers are used to working on the server, it changes the way they connect on it. All connections to servers are made through a single sign-on and private user access. All the actions performed on servers and in Werbot web interface are logged and recorded (screencasts). The server administrator can not only see what was done on the server by each user and when it was done but also can replay the whole working session in our player. The server audit is made much easier with Werbot.
